At a hearing of the Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development of the House Committee on Appropriations, of all places. His testimony contains some of what I’ve been wanting to hear from him, a sober assessment of what the Japan incident means for the U.S. (obviously I quibble with the administration’s arguments for the components of the “diverse set” of energy sources, but that is beside the point):
The American people should have full confidence that the United States has rigorous safety regulations in place to ensure that our nuclear power is generated safely and responsibly. Information is still coming in about the events unfolding in Japan, but the Administration is committed to learning from Japan’s experience as we work to continue to strengthen America’s nuclear industry.
Safety remains at the forefront of our effort to responsibly develop America’s energy resources, and we will continue to incorporate best practices and lessons learned into that process.
To meet our energy needs, the Administration believes we must rely on a diverse set of energy sources including renewables like wind and solar, natural gas, clean coal and nuclear power. We look forward to a continued dialogue with Congress on moving that agenda forward.
About time, too. He still needs to make a major speech on this, but for now I’m glad to see that responsibility appears to be prevailing. Well said, Steven Chu.
I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but the back-breaker for the Fukushima plant was the 30 foot wall of water.
If that's correct, then the lesson we can learn is nuclear plants shouldn't be built in Galveston, New Orleans, Gulfport, or Miami.
Otherwise, let's get building.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIain, the three paragraphs you've posted are predictable boilerplate that anybody could have written or said. I really don't understand what you expected from Chu, or what you find valuable in his present statement.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseLTHL - Guarding against the disaster that just happened is no wiser in the realm of energy than it is with security or regulating Wall Street or anything else. Can you really not think of any other situation where reactors would fail aside from a tsunami? I can - not that that should necessarily put an end to nuclear in America. I happened to think we need to skip the grandiose technological fixes and adjust to a radically lower-power existence in which we all do less and have less, but I know I'm in the minority.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseRight you are. None of the damage to any of the plants was due to seismic activity. It was soley due to loss of all AC power and loss of emergency diesels.HINT: they dont run well under water
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"Well said, Steven Chu"? Huh?
I find it mindboggling that any thinking person takes seriously at face value anything the Obama administration says. When will people learn to pay more attention to what this administration does, than what it says?
The Obama administration terminated Yucca Mountain, throwing away tens of billions of dollars spent on that project.
They appointed a "blue ribbon commission" to "study" the problem for two more years and then claim they can't actually do anything to move forward on nuclear power until after the two year study period elapses.
I'm sure Iain will next be telling us about how much the Obama administration loves oil & gas drilling. After all, just ask them!
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWisco, there are many situations under which a reactor can fail--and nuclear power plants tend to be built with most of them--if not all of them in mind. With failsafe after failsafe.
Right now we have not yet had a meltdown, no one has died from radiation poisoning--and the plant was hit with a 30 FOOT WALL OF WATER. That should tell you something about safety.
The luddite green future you aspire to would be much less able to cope with this or any disaster. But, since part of that luddite green future involves the lowering of population, I'm sure that for you, this is a feature, not a bug.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abusewisco: I can think of scenarios whereby anything can fail. By you logic, we should then never do anything.
Life is full of risks. Live with it.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abusewisco: If living with less is truely what you desire. Go for it. Nobody's stopping you.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseCurrent "nukelar" technology using light water reactors requires a not insignificant volume of cooling water for the heat exchangers so they are naturally situated near sizeable bodies of water.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseHowever, there are newer technologies which have significant advantages in all areas including efficiency and safety, if we ever get a chance to use them.
External Link
I keep hearing from nuclear power advocates how this isn't like Three Mile Island. Or it won't get as bad as Chernobyl, but I think overly optimistic pronouncements are just as unhelpful as breathless mutterings of doom by newly appointed pundit-scientists. I think the full scale of this incident and its potential horrors has yet to reveal itself.
Obviously we need substantial amounts of energy to maintain our way of life and recover from our economic troubles, but we can't ignore the potential costs of nuclear power that may out way the benefits of other sources of energy (ex: natural gas).
I think the current exploits of Japan's brave 50 workers at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Station will be an important part of the debate in this country on what we are willing to risk for plentiful energy. We should keep in mind many of these workers have already lost their homes and families.
"A small crew of technicians, braving radiation and fire, became the only people remaining at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station on Tuesday — and perhaps Japan's last chance of preventing a broader nuclear catastrophe."
"They crawl through labyrinths of equipment in utter darkness pierced only by their flashlights, listening for periodic explosions as hydrogen gas escaping from crippled reactors ignites on contact with air."
"They breathe through uncomfortable respirators or carry heavy oxygen tanks on their backs. They wear white, full-body jumpsuits with snug-fitting hoods that provide scant protection from the invisible radiation sleeting through their bodies..."
"They have volunteered, or been assigned, to pump seawater on dangerously exposed nuclear fuel to prevent full meltdowns that could throw thousands of tons of radioactive dust high into the air and imperil millions of their compatriots."
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseLatest news:
"Workers have abandoned Japan's quake-stricken nuclear plant on the verge of meltdown Tuesday when increasing radiation levels made it too dangerous to remain."
This is not good. Not good at all.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseCompare/Contrast
Fukushima Dai-ichi plant today (picture link)
External Link
Chernobyl 1986 (picture link)
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseExternal Link