From Jeff Rosen’s review of Daniel Domscheit-Berg’s book, “Inside Wikileaks.”
Domscheit-Berg attributes Wiki Leaks’s increasing brazenness to Assange, who was more interested in attracting publicity (and women) than in making careful determinations about newsworthiness. Although he praises Assange for being “imaginative” and “energetic,” he ultimately finds him “so paranoid, so power-hungry, so megalomaniac” that he adopted the cultish secrecy, financial opacity and self-promoting marketing strategies of the people he fought against. A nomad and eccentric who wore two pairs of dirty pants and worked off a laptop while sleeping on borrowed couches, Assange was constantly fleeing from real and imagined enemies, objecting to Domscheit-Berg’s basement apartment because he feared his critics could peer through the windows. At the same time, Assange was contemptuous of his American supporters, such as the feminist Naomi Wolf and the filmmaker Michael Moore, who donated the bail money that secured his release from prison on rape charges. He ran WikiLeaks as a cult of personality, one that reminded Domscheit-Berg of the Church of Scientology, whose rituals they exposed. Although an anarchist who believed that those in power should be brought low, Assange refused to tolerate any criticism from his subordinates. Once Domscheit-Berg began to challenge him, their friendship fell apart. “Do not challenge leadership in times of crisis” became Assange’s favorite slogan.
Assange has never been the issue to me. He's a dime a dozen. If it weren't him it would have been some other left wing trash. The real problem is Manning. Even Conservatives are reluctant to go there because of the big fat homosexual elephant in the room.
And I want to go on record that if I'm ever in a Federal prison, military brig or county lockup, I want to be alone in my cell TWENTY FOUR hours a day.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abusebecause if a disgruntled former employee hawking a book says it, it must be true. must not question the government. must. not. question. the. government.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseFrankly, in our coarsened, degraded modern society, the fact that somebody would engage in the attack on America in order to "get babes" doesn't shock me in the least. I do, however, think anyone who chooses that path should at least demand a health test on any such "babes" so-attracted.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseJonah, you yourself have wondered aloud why Assange has not yet been garroted in a dark hotel room. How is he supposed to react to that?
And besides, I think you ought to be able to understand the difference between authoritarianism in a private venture, and authoritarianism in government.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseCompare response to this book to the response to Scott Mclellans's
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseHuh. Another lefty turns totalitarian when a little power is acquired. Who 'da thunk it?
NotStrider: your hero has innocent blood on his hands.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse“Do not challenge leadership in times of crisis” became As*ange’s favorite slogan.
Do as I say, not as I do.
Another classical liberal.
Stupid filter won't let the name of the Guy who's the subject of the post, through. Sheesh guys, with all them money you're getting from the new gotcha, can't you afford a decent bad word filter?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThose unsuspecting people who loaned As*ange their couches should thank their luck stars that he didn't practice his psychotic, paranoid fantasies on *them*.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse