My column this weekend was about the Obama administration’s infatuation with the Muslim Brotherhood — an infatuation that flies under the lunatic banner of “Islamic Outreach.” I’ve often wondered what would have happened if, when I was a young prosecutor, I had gone into Rudy Giuliani’s office and said, “Y’know boss, I really think we ought to bring Carlo Gambino in here for a meeting and see if we can’t work this thing out — maybe get his views on what our agents could be doing better, try to understand his grievances.” I don’t need to wonder long — I’d have been looking for a new job the next day. But that was then. Now, alas, the “outreach” crowd is running the asylum — and we’re reaching out not to mobsters and their apologists but to the agents of organizations that want to destroy the West.
In the column, I rehearse Patrick Poole’s revelations from last week that political appointees in the Obama Justice Department quashed plans to indict a top official of CAIR (the Council on American Islamic Relations) and other Islamist groups and activists who had been designated by the U.S. attorney’s office in Dallas as unindicted coconspirators in the Muslim Brotherhood’s Hamas financing scheme — an enterprise that sent tens of millions of dollars to Palestinian jihadists during the Intifada.
Pat’s reporting (at Pajamas) relies on a high-ranking DOJ official. He interviewed that official, on condition of anonymity, for six hours. Today, Pat reports additional revelations, focusing on how the Obama administration’s commitment to outreach — particularly by the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security — continues to jeopardize active terrorism investigations. The DOJ official points out that the delusion that our security jihadist violence is improved by reaching out to Islamists did not start with the Obama administration, but it has picked up steam:
[W]e’re having countless meetings from the Cabinet level on down with groups and individuals that we know are bad guys and who we’ve repeatedly said in court are actively working to support terrorist groups overseas. We even had [FBI General Counsel] Valerie Caproni meeting regularly with these Hamas guys to get their guidance. What advice do you think they were giving her? And she knew exactly who she was dealing with. It was the FBI who went into federal court and said that CAIR is Hamas. . . .
We say publicly that we don’t have an official relationship, but CAIR still has most of the staff in [Attorney General Eric] Holder and [FBI Director Robert] Mueller’s offices on speed dial. Don’t think for a minute that we stopped dealing with them. . . .
Now think for a minute about what we’re doing in any other context. Thirty years ago we didn’t have government liaisons to the IRA. The FBI doesn’t have an interfaith outreach to the Mafia. Janet Napolitano doesn’t sit down and have lunch meetings with the Mexican drug cartels. And we don’t appoint members of the Crips and Bloods to our advisory boards on gangs. Well, not yet, at least [laughs]. . . . [B]ut we have been allowing the bad guys to dictate our national policy on terrorism since the World Trade Center bombing [in 1993].
Let’s not forget that during the Clinton administration we had one of al-Qaeda’s top operatives in America — Abdurahman Alamoudi — organizing iftar dinners at the White House! The same guy who stood beside President Bush right after 9/11. Two years later he’s in prison, but his people are still popping up all over Washington. Then we had [CAIR Executive Director] Nihad Awad advising Al Gore’s aviation security commission back in the late 90s. We said absolutely nothing even though we had him on our wiretaps five years before at a major Hamas meeting in Philadelphia. Nobody from DOJ or the FBI said a goddamn word because CAIR was advising every single federal agency dealing with terrorism at the time. We wouldn’t have these problems if we had cut them off then and there.
As a concrete recent example of how outreach programs undermine investigations, the DOJ official pointed to the Minnesota probe involving young Somali men who went missing because . . . they were recruited by imams at various mosques to join al-Shabaab, the al-Qaeda-linked terror organization that seeks to establish a sharia state on the east coast of Africa. The DOJ official points out that the imams doing the recruiting included the government’s “outreach partners” — and, as Pat observes, testimony at Rep. Peter King’s hearing on radicalization confirmed that community Muslim leaders and CAIR were intimidating the families of missing Somali men to prevent them from cooperating with the FBI.
The DOJ official expressed great frustration that the ensuing investigations produced charges only against low-level players, leaving “the imams who recruited these kids and sent them to fight and die” untouched. But worse, the source says, the government is “still working with these guys” . . . and playing DHS for idiots:
About two months after all these kids disappear, the Al-Shabaab imams from all over the country get together at a meeting in Ohio, including the Minneapolis imams we’re looking at. Do we wiretap the meeting? Of course not. Instead, a representative for the imams convinces some dimwit attorney from Homeland Security Civil Rights division to come talk at their meeting about outreach. And so they let this guy talk for about ten minutes, then he’s quickly ushered out of the building so they can get down to business. This gives them perfect cover. “Well we can’t be having a terrorist meeting because we had Homeland Security here!”
And can you guess what happened to the imam’s lackey who arranged for Homeland Security to be at that meeting? He’s now one of [Homeland Security Secretary] Napolitano’s senior advisors and running all of their Somali outreach! They gave this guy a security clearance! I’m not f***ing kidding you! If anyone wants to understand how utterly insane our outreach policy is they should start right there.
Finally, on the depth and danger of Islamist penetration of our national-security apparatus:
Look, I have to admit that these guys are evil, but they’re absolutely brilliant. They are so inside our decision-making process they will always be twenty steps ahead of us. . . . [F]or or us to return to some semblance of sanity we have got to stop relying on the bad guys to make our counterterrorism policy. And we damn well have to stop hiring these people and putting them in charge of outreach.
We also need to get rid of all these supposed outside experts. Four years ago a bunch of these academic idiots were telling us that Al-Shabaab was a nationalist organization that was only concerned with liberating Somalia from U.S.-backed foreign occupation and there was nothing to worry about. Does anyone still believe that? I mean we just had that Somali kid from Portland [Mohamed Osman Mohamud] try to set off a bomb in the middle of a Christmas celebration that would have killed hundreds of people. The [FBI] ran a solid operation on that one, but they aren’t going to be able to catch them all.
And when the day comes that we have dead Americans lying in our streets, you know what we’re going to hear from these experts? We need more outreach! I guarantee it! And they’ll get huge grants from DOJ, FBI, and DHS to tell us that.
Yup.
I'm at a loss for words.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseYou said something in the speech 4/11 in Boston that is very important, the gist of which was that the one good thing about the civilian trial process for terrorists was that so much damning information was revealed in open court. External Link
The problem is that the court was filled with HLF5 supporters, not press. The damning evidence was put out in open court but those facts are only being used by the tiny pool of anti-terrorism journalists and activists.
What was it? Nine months in 1995 that Court TV invested in covering the O.J. Simpson trial?
Yet when the most important terrorism financing trial in U.S. history was held in 2007/2008 only one reporter covered the two trials on a daily basis?
The guts of the Muslim Brotherhood affiliated terror network in the United States was spilled in open court over two months in 2007 and two months in 2008. Instead of showing any interest in the evidence, the press has been able to continue to press their fantasy view of the Islamist network in the U.S.
The 2008 jury got it right covicting on all counts, and the idea that ONE juror from 2007 can justify the DOJ excuse of jury nullification for its refusal to allow the prosecution of CAIR is just fantasy.
If the press had done their job on the HLF5 trial, that fantasy would be understood far and wide as pure malarky.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIf this repugnant story abt the truly despicable Obama regime is true then the anonymous "high-ranking DOJ official" will have surely sky-lined himself and be fired soon for cause. Why? His objections to what he is now surreptitiously taking public would be obvious to his colleagues in the institutional DOJ. In fact there would be a long document/internal memo trail of his objections. If not, why not? "High-ranking DOJ official" also strikes me as someone who could/should resign - perhaps with pension intact - if he is truly so troubled by the beans he spills. I really find no more honor in this fellow's motives than I would attribute to Daniel Ellsburg or any of the legions of kiss-and-tell leftist bureaucrats who have provided scurrilous details abt institutional malfeasance during Republican Administrations. And his failure to act on conscience beyond a veiled interview to someone most people never heard of makes his veracity or that of the interviewer highly suspect.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAllow me to add to my previous comment: ...much though I prefer to believe everything in this piece as written. This story will either quickly gain legs given its explosive quality, or I'm afraid it is not to be fully believed.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseJust another chapter in the liberal liturgy filed under "Useful Idiots".
Liberals are like women who embrace "bad boys". They delude themselves into thinking that the dulcet sounds of their "enlightened", very well meaning, voices will induce "change". Change in people who have incredibly deep, malevolent, characters.
God save us from "well meaning" fools.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseLet's cut to the chase: if this story turns out to be true, there is every reason to believe we have an active fifth column that has deeply infiltrated the federal bureaucracy and this Administration.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"If" the story proves true? If you followed counter-terrorism, you'd already know the strongest likelihood of the veracity of this report. Patrick Poole is a name that people who follow counter-terrorism are familiar with.
The high ranking DOJ official should NOT quit, but stay to fight on when in 2012 this country sends Team Obama packing once and for all. (Please, God!)
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"God save us from 'well meaning' fools."
I am no longer one bit sure that these 'fools' (including President Obama) are well-meaning. If they are well-meaning, why do they not speak out against the continuing attacks on Christians and Jews around the world?
One can only hope that they are merely fools, and not worse.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseDonnaDiorio-Actually I know a lot abt counterterrorism. My say so doesn't make me an expert in the field. Nor does being a published author and public speaker in the field - which I am. Nor does my Certified Protection Professional credential; nor my unique extensive international expertise in air cargo security. Let's just grant that I am NOT a counterterror expert. I know a fellow non-expert when I see one, and Patrick Poole is laughably unqualified as anything but a blogger - and an embarrassingly bad blogger at that. Neither you nor Andrew McCarthy (who is indeed a counterterror expert) can cite a single noteworthy credential of self-acclaimed expert Patrick Poole. You wouldn't know what one is. Andrew McCarthy does - and should be ridiculed for elevating Poole to quote-able status on a matter of such gravity.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSal: It doesn't take a brain surgeon or a rocket scientist to interview a DOJ CT whistleblower and report the conversation.
It doesn't take a Ivy League grad to follow the twisted path of U.S. handling of the Islamist terror network, nor does it require one to be a CT expert or a properly dignified-credentialed investigative journalist.
All that is required is an American who is concerned enough to keep a watchful eye.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSince my name was being invoked and my credentials openly questioned by "SalVetUSMC" I thought I would jump in and reply.
Unfortunately, "SalVetUSMC", the United States military believes believes I'm more than qualified as a counter-terrorism expert since the US Army Provost Marshal has invited me repeatedly to address the Army's annual anti-terrorism conference with hundreds of ATOs from around the world in attendance. I've given lectures at both the US Army War College and the Air Force Staff and Command College, and conducted briefings for at least a dozen military anti-terrorism programs, including US TRANSCOM, Army TRADOC, Air Mobility Command, USAREC, USAAC and several state national guards.
That's in addition to the thousands of law enforcement officers I've trained for numerous state and local agencies. And my academic articles have been published by the Journal of International Security Affairs and the Middle East Review of International Affairs, as well as my white paper by the Center for Security Policy.
And just last month I testified before two separate committees of the Arizona legislature on cross-border terror threats.
All of the above is publicly available information.
Let's not forget the Team B II report I helped co-author with former federal prosecutor McCarthy, former CIA Director Jim Woolsey, former DIA director Lt. Gen Ed Soyster, et al. My co-authors must not have got "SalVetUSMC"'s memo that I'm just a mere blogger.
But if all the above only qualifies me to be a mere blogger, I'm not sure what I'll need to do to qualify for "SalVetUSMC"'s vaunted "counter-terrorism expert" status.
And yes, "SalVetUSMC", now that Rep. Peter King has asked Eric Holder to turn over all information regarding the DOJ's scuttling of these terror finance prosecutions based on my reporting, we'll see how accurate my reporting actually is. I readily welcome it and look forward to what Holder has to say!
And rest assured, when my reporting is confirmed and I'm vindicated, I'll be here every day at NRO hectoring you for an apology.
Kind regards,
PP
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI am amazed at the need of SalVetUSMC to kill the messenger. Does USMC stand for Uncle Sam's Misguided Children, or United States Marine Corps, where I was once employed?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseJust curious--was any of this same garbage going on in other administrations or just Clinton/Obama?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThank you for the work you do. All I can do is stay informed, talk to people, post and pray, which I do. I pray daily that God protects Israel and America and gets obama, holder, and all the rest out of there as soon as possible. I've been following this for a long time and have a home library (including Andrew's books, as well as those by many others in the field), so I know that what you say is true.
For those who don't, may I recommend that you read the books "Infiltration," "Willful Blindness," or "Muslim Mafia"? It is well-documented. It's hard to believe because it is "the big lie." (Who would lie about appointing muslim brotherhood members to TSA and Homeland Security?!) But we know the big lie works best of all. Yes, we have been infiltrated by the enemy. At all levels and in all areas, which includes the media, academia, etc.
You have my admiration and appreciation.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse