Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Corner

The one and only.

Print   |  Text
 

Earth Day Notes

This Friday is Earth Day . . . wait, what’s that? You don’t have it marked and circled on your calendar? You’re not planning to wear hemp-cloth and (recycled) ashes this Friday? You have this Friday marked down as Good Friday?

Well fine, then. But if you don’t go in for that Christian tradition/Western Civ stuff, check out my new Almanac of Environmental Trends, out today from my peeps at the Pacific Research Institute. The Almanac is a “reboot” of my old Index of Leading Environmental Indicators that I published every year on Earth Day starting way back in 1994. It was originally inspired by Bill Bennett’s fabulously successful Index of Leading Cultural Indicators he put out back in 1993, which consisted of simple time-series charts and graphs on the data about welfare dependency, crime rates, school test scores, drug abuse, teen pregnancy, etc. — in other words, a gallery of mostly bad news.

I thought the same exercise would be interesting to do for the environment in the United States, but for the opposite reason: Most environmental conditions in the U.S. were getting better, only no one knew because neither the media nor environmental activists want you to know this. I’ve kidded Bennett about how I never got quite as much press coverage as his report did, because while his report was about sex, drugs, and rock ‘n’ roll, mine was about polychlorinated biphenyls (which are down sharply since the 1980s, by the way). I also told Bill on his radio show this morning that I tried to figure out a way to name the reboot something like The Environmental Book of Virtue, but couldn’t quite make it work.

Anyway, I decided to drop the old format as it was starting to get stale and repetitive, and go with a new format that allows for constant updates and changes in the data in our digital age.  The Almanac out today is something of a “greatest hits” collection from the last 15 years worth of Indexes, with the data updated and compiled into something that resembles a desk reference format (hard copy available if you want soon). But now we can update the project almost on a daily basis. That’s what the companion website, www.environmentaltrends.org, will do.

The ultimate reason environmental conditions in the U.S. have improved so much is economic prosperity and technological innovation. Of course regulation has played a role, but the problem is that our style of environmental regulation relates to the improvements in real conditions in much the same way that police brutality pushes down the crime rate (in other words, the EPA is the environmental equivalent of rogue cops). If you drop back and look at the data for the whole world (as I do in the Introduction to the Almanac), you will see that the nations with the best environmental conditions are those with strong property rights, economic freedom, and prosperity — three things environmentalists hate or define so narrowly as to be meaningless. The nations with the worst environmental conditions are poor and without property rights and economic freedom.

New on The Corner. . .


COMMENTS   11

EXPAND  

   04/20/11 11:55

And is not the day after Saturn's Day?
And two days after that, a big shout out to the Moon!

When, pray tell, do we celebrate all things Mercurial?

Al Gore is itching to know!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   04/20/11 12:04

On this coming Friday, Christians can be proud that Roman execution methods had such a miniscule carbon footprint.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   04/20/11 12:06

Earth Day -- eh? It is also trash day at my home, so I will celebrate by taking all of the recycling that my wife assiduously forces our family to separate out, and dump it right into the trash bin.

I will put on every light in the house, all four TVs, turn on the AC (even if it is pleasant out), and over-water my cactus.

Then go and celebrate the sacrifice of my Lord.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   04/20/11 12:11

SeanB
You should do that every day. That'll show em.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   04/20/11 12:16

Honestly, I am not a troll, and I think the Almanac is a great thing that deserves wide circulation, but I would like to understand from Mr. Hayward why it is that ITQ is good (p. 23) but cap and trade is bad (p. 105)? Are these not equivalent concepts?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   04/20/11 12:17

@DrPalinIpresume -- thanks for the suggestion. Don't get me wrong--I think all anti-industrial Luddites should conserve and recycle and live like savages so as to leave more for me to use to ensure my comfort.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
 VRWC
   04/20/11 12:21

I started my own tradition and celebrated Earth Day last year by buying some Exxon Mobil stock.... it's up 22% versus 8% for the market.... plus a dividend....

thinking about either natural gas or some nuke companies this year....

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   04/20/11 12:28

I don't know why it would surprise environmentalists or anyone with a working brain that property rights and prosperity would correlate with a better environment (of course, it may be that the problem is there is a very small intersection of those two sets).

Property rights: If "everyone" owns the forest, I don't see any problem with taking everything out of it I can; if I don't someone else will. If it's my forest, however, I'm going to be much more careful about taking care of it so that it will still be good twenty years down the road. Property rights help prevent the "tragedy of the commons."

Prosperity: If I have a choice between burning down the forest for agriculture and leaving it as it is, my decision will depend on how much I value the forest. If my kids are starving or cold or sleeping in a shack, the forest goes. If we have everything we need, on the other hand, then I may value the beauty and peace of the forest more than any money that the agriculture would bring. In society prosperous enough to meet most of its needs, there are enough resources and time to worry about conservation.

I'm less sure about a direct connection between economic freedom and the environment, but I don't know of many places that don't have economic freedom but do have property rights and prosperity.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   04/20/11 17:45

Don't diversity, multitculturalism, and general political correctness dictate that an Earth Day in the absence of a corresponding Moon Day be immoral due to bias, prejudice, and exclusivity? Is it because the moon is, well.... white?

Raaaaaaaaaaaaaacist!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
DHH
   04/20/11 18:06

@henry hawkins:

You conveniently omitted one crucial fact regarding the moon: Only half of its surface is white, while the other half is dark... And the latter one is the half that never gets a single ray of sunlight.

Coincidence? Or rather a blatant example of brazen oppression by The Man (in the moon)? You be the judge...

(hint: it's the latter)

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   04/20/11 19:08

Hmmm. Good points all.

And there is another conspicuous absence. Why is the RED planet left out??? Ohhh, this goes deeper than we thought.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact