At Pajamas, Patrick Poole, who broke the story that the Obama Justice Department quashed an effort by the U.S. attorney in Dallas to indict a top CAIR official, has now reported that political appointees in the Obama Justice Department also killed an effort by the U.S. attorney in Alexandria to indict senior leaders of other Islamist groups with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.
Congressional sources, who were apparently spurred to investigate by Poole’s reporting about the dropping of the CAIR case, have reportedly told Poole that another case
scuttled by Assistant Attorney General David Kris (who wrote the memo declining to prosecute Omar Ahmad in the Holy Land Foundation case) was a tax evasion and money laundering prosecution prepared by the U.S. attorney’s office in the eastern district of Virginia. The targets of these indictments would have been several Muslim leaders of the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) and the now-defunct SAAR Foundation/SAFA Group, who were investigated and raided for a wide range of activities to support foreign terrorist organizations.
That case was part of an investigation that targeted Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) leader Sami Al-Arian, who was charged with contempt by the federal judge in the IIIT/SAAR case for refusing to testify about how the groups had financially and materially supported Al-Arian’s PIJ front based in Tampa, Florida, despite his plea agreement requiring him to do so. Because of Al-Arian’s lack of cooperation in the IIIT/SAAR case, federal prosecutors were only prepared to indict the IIIT/SAAR leaders on money laundering and tax evasion charges.
Congressional investigators who spoke to me also say that one of the Muslim leaders targeted by these indictments was Jamal Barzinji, a longtime IIIT official and former national president of the Muslim Student Association (whose terror ties I reported on here at PJM last August).
At the time of the raids on IIIT and SAAR back in 2003, U.S. Customs Service Special Agent David Kane testified in an affidavit requesting the search warrants, filed in federal court, that Barzinji “is not only closely associated with PIJ (as evidenced by ties to Al-Arian, including documents seized in Tampa in 1995 reflecting direct correspondence between Barzinji and Al-Arian), but also with HAMAS.”
In 2008, Barzinji donated $1,000 to the Barack Obama presidential campaign. In the 2009-2010 cycle, he donated to three Democrats: Rep. Jim Moran (VA); Rep. Keith Ellison (MN), the first Muslim congressman; and Sen. Jim Webb (VA). In 2002, Moran returned $10,000 in campaign contributions from officials associated with IIIT and SAAR….
Hopefully, someone educated in the legal profession can explain to a rube like me how this is different than what forced Alberto Gonzalez to resign - to say nothing about all the (phony) media indignation that fell upon him.
Where's the similar outrage about Holder?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThis is such a special time in US history that I really don't have the words to express how I am feeling reading this.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe Obama Administration is a clear and present danger to the national security of the United State of America.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWhat is the statute of limitations on these charges? Can they be brought in January of 2013?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWhat Eric Holder's DOJ is doing - selectively enforcing laws based on political preferences - seems very similar to what Democrats accused Alberto Gonzales' DOJ of doing. The only difference I can see is that AG Gonzales was forced to resign. I recall Democrats tearing their hair out and pounding their chests because Bush, Gonzales and others had politicized the DOJ. Chuck Schumer led the charge, claiming laws had been broken by conspirators in the evil Bush administration.
Democrats insisted the firing of eight (or nine?) U.S. Attorneys was illegal and/or unethical because they were fired as a means for the Bush administration to influence the prosecution of certain cases and were not dissuaded from this position by the fact that U.S. Attorneys are Presidential appointees who serve at the pleasure of the President. They can be fired for any reason or no reason at all. As far as I know, that accusation was never proven and it appears, a number of years later, that the investigation of wrongdoing by members of the Bush DOJ went no where.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseHolder - Democrat = GOOD
Gonzolas - Republican = Baaaaaad
Case closed...
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse