Elliott Abrams writes:
President Obama will bask in the satisfaction of all Americans that justice has finally been done-and done through an assault that combined the best of intelligence work with a courageous and well planned military operation. It is entirely appropriate that Mr. Obama and the Administration get and take a fair amount of credit.
It is therefore unfortunate that Mr. Obama seems to want more than that fair share the American people will naturally and rightly give him. His remarks last night were far too much laced with words like “I met repeatedly,” “at my direction,” and “I determined,” trying to take personal credit for the years of painstaking work by our intelligence community. Mr. Obama might have noted that this work began under President Bush, but as usual he did not. It was also a mistake for him to use this occasion to deliver unrelated comments about “the pursuit of prosperity for our people” and “the struggle for equality for all our citizens.” A shorter and more straightforward announcement would have been more appropriate for this occasion.
Once again here the White House appeared unable to get the messaging quite right, a failure magnified by the amateurish delay of more than an hour in Mr. Obama’s remarks. The White House told the nation at roughly 10 p.m. that the President would speak at 10.30. Had the President done so, he would have delivered fabulous and shocking news. By the time he actually spoke nearer to midnight his words were an anticlimax, for all the news had leaked. Whatever the cause of this delay — Mr. Obama editing the remarks for too long, or a belatedly discovered need to brief Congressional and world leaders — it suggested that the calm professionalism in the face of crisis shown here by our military and intelligence professionals has yet to be achieved in the White House.
Quite right, K-Lo. Our president's narcissism, incompetence, and moral depravity were on full display last night. I expect his poll numbers will nosedive accordingly.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIdiotic statement. Lets all just be happy they got him. This is not a time for politics.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWhere does this pathology come from?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAt least he didn't suit up and pose on a carrier deck with some dumb and inaccurate banner behind him.
It's entirely appropriate for a commander-in-chief to use the language Obama did. He's communicating to the world that this wasn't just a lucky find, this was a planned mission given the go at the highest levels of the U.S. government.
The problem lies with those who just cannot quite accept that he was elected to that job.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseMr. Abrams is correct, as is Mark Steyn below. We saw the teaser that there was a major address, something important Obama had to tell the American public. I guess it wasn't important enough to do it on schedule, a schedule he set. Keep the hoi polloi waiting, they are peasants anyway, and Obama had to insert a few more “I did it”, “I am great” comments. After the delay, it became clear Osama was dead, so we went to bed. Glad we did, for listening to Obama would have been painful, as it always is. Dr. Krauthammer had it right, Obama leads from the rear—the far, far rear, then leaps to the teleprompter to take credit. Sadly, at a time when this nation needs a unifying leader, we have only a fop, who divides.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseCongratulations to Mr. Abrams. He's won the special award for being the first to couch his anger and condescension towards Barack Obama's success in quasi-intellectual terms. And congratulations also to Ms. Lopez, who has won the "Arm's Length" award for being the first to post this controversial view in the form of a quote from someone else in order to distance herself from the conclusion. But there are still more prizes to win, so keep playing!
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse... And I will always remember where I was on that day, when Obama started getting criticized for the Osama bin Laden-is-dead speech . . .
He really WAS arrogant, wasn't he! Thanking the CIA and the troops and reassuring the families of people who were killed on 9/11! Radical-in-chief! Radical-in-chief!
BrianW is exactly right, and it makes National Review look silly to endorse this kind of barrel-scraping. This is the sort of thing that makes people not take conservatives seriously.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"This is not a time for politics."
No, the time for politics was 11:45 last night.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseHere's a question: If we carried out this raid without informing the Pakistanis, would this legally constitute an act of war for violating their territorial integrity? I completely applaud Obama's decision (it's high time he did something right), but can you imagine the howls from the Left if Bush ordered this.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI admire Frank 1914's point of view on this. It is important to understand how the Obama supporters will spin the situation. In this case I see three things:
(1) an egregious smear of Bush. Sadly this now appears to be derigeur.
(2) Obama simply explained how much work this was. Not that this was important to the moment mind you, but Hey.
(3) We're all racists for criticising Obama. Those of us who found his words unfullfilling are simply incapable of accepting the fact that's he's president.
I suspect that we'll be seeing variations of the above themes if the criticism becomes more vocal.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseOne more point: I must agree with many of the commenters here that we should lay off Obama's self-serving comments on this news. He still be a narcissist up through the 2012 election. Let's just bask in the knowledge that bin Laden is, literally, fish food.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"At least he didn't suit up and pose on a carrier deck with some dumb and inaccurate banner behind him."
So your argument, stated explicitly is: "So what if it was flawed, at least it wasn't as flawed as Bush's." And that is a worthy argument exactly how?
"It's entirely appropriate for a commander-in-chief to use the language Obama did. He's communicating to the world that this wasn't just a lucky find, this was a planned mission given the go at the highest levels of the U.S. government."
Absolutely. At the same time it's not unreasonable to see the speech as a little heavy on the I, I , I routine. It is it beyond-the-pale to suggest that he might have conveyed the same message (this hit was launched at the top) without using the first person so much? I think not.
"The problem lies with those who just cannot quite accept that he was elected to that job."
Even as an example of coded language for "you're all just a bunch of racists" this is pretty pathetic.
Have a nice day!
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseFrank1914: What was innacurate about the banner? The carrier task force had accomplished it's mission.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI think the White House's big misstep was the repeated delays in making the announcement. He basically let the media do the talking for a better part of an hour, and when he finally showed up there was nothing really left to tell. And even when he finally got around to making the speech he didn't really give much in the way of new information. A pretty forgettable moment for Obama when it really shouldn't have been.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWhy won't anyone actually do the math rather than venting their feelings. There were four or five first-person pronouns in there, including such attention-hogging lines as "I was briefed."
Let's just tot up a tiny few of the "we's" and "our's" and times he gave credit to others, OK? This isn't all of them, but most of them.
he worst attack on the American people in our history.
images of 9/11 are seared into our national memory
Nearly 3,000 citizens taken from us, leaving a gaping hole in our hearts.
in our time of grief, the American people came together. We offered our neighbors a hand, and we offered the wounded our blood. We reaffirmed our ties to each other, and our love of community and country. On that day, no matter where we came from, what God we prayed to, or what race or ethnicity we were, we were united as one American family.
We were also united in our resolve to protect our nation
And so we went to war against al Qaeda to protect our citizens, our friends, and our allies.
Over the last 10 years, thanks to the tireless and heroic work of our military and our counterterrorism professionals, we've made great strides in that effort. We've disrupted terrorist attacks and strengthened our homeland defense. In Afghanistan, we removed the Taliban government, which had given bin Laden and al Qaeda safe haven and support. And around the globe, we worked with our friends and allies to capture or kill scores of al Qaeda terrorists, including several who were a part of the 9/11 plot.
A small team of Americans carried out the operation with extraordinary courage and capability.
We must --- and we will -- remain vigilant at home and abroad.
I've made clear, *just as President Bush did* shortly after 9/11, that our war is not against Islam.
After nearly 10 years of service, struggle, and sacrifice, we know well the costs of war. These efforts weigh on me every time I, as commander in chief, have to sign a letter to a family that has lost a loved one, or look into the eyes of a service member who's been gravely wounded.
we will never tolerate our security being threatened, nor stand idly by when our people have been killed. We will be relentless in defense of our citizens and our friends and allies. We will be true to the values that make us who we are.
we give thanks to the countless intelligence and counterterrorism professionals who've worked tirelessly to achieve this outcome.
We give thanks for the men who carried out this operation, for they exemplify the professionalism, patriotism, and unparalleled courage of those who serve our country
Finally, let me say to the families who lost loved ones on 9/11 that we have never forgotten your loss, nor wavered in our commitment to see that we do whatever it takes to prevent another attack on our shores.
And tonight, let us think back to the sense of unity that prevailed on 9/11.
Think we can do that last bit? Or shall we pick on a few I's in a sea of we's in the president's speech?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI didn't vote for him.
I'm not going to vote for him.
But in his execution of this mission, and in his statement that represented Americans so well, I see only excellence. For the first time in his career, Obama has acted with a conviction I actually share. There's nothing wrong with his demonstration of the steps he took in leading this way.
Well done, Mr. President.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseA mother is at the beach with her son. The tide drags the child out to sea. He's drowning. The lifeguard risks his life, fights the current, rescues the child and brings the child safely to the mother who says impatiently: "He was wearing a hat."
I don't read Elliot Abrams that much so I don't get if he's ironic or not - he is making the way in which Obama made the announcement of an achievement (complete with mind-reading as to the source of the delay), a serious argument about Obama's competency?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseA too long delay after a portentous announcement. "If this is so important that it must be announced at 10:30 Eastern time," my husband said, "then, why the long delay?"
"Right," I said. Then, a moment's consideration of that inconsistency and we both knew that the announcement was going to be about the killing or capture of Bin Laden and that the president's people were catching up to the news and forming it into an announcement of their own accomplishment.
Krauthammer had it only part right. He's "reading from behind."
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuseto trushack: it should be a forgettable moment for obama....since it wasnt about obama it was about the killing of bin laden and remembering the 9/11 families
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI'm actually embarrassed for you that you put this up. Amy Ponce is exactly right. This reads like sour grapes and whining, and I would expect better from National Review.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse