Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

March 5 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Corner

The one and only.

Print   |  Text
 

“Getting to Denmark”

It took the best part of a decade for Francis Fukuyama’s “End of History” to be chewed up and spit out by a resurgent Islam. His latest tome may get upended somewhat quicker. The new thesis attempts to explain why the old thesis didn’t quite turn out as planned:

At the heart of this remarkable book is the idea of “getting to Denmark.” By this, Fukuyama means creating stable, peaceful, prosperous, inclusive, and honest societies (like Denmark). As in his “End of History” essay, Fukuyama treats this as the logical endpoint of social development, and suggests that Denmarkness requires three things: functioning states, rule of law, and accountable government.

Fascinating. Speaking of that second category (“rule of law”), has he been to Denmark lately? I was there a couple of months back as the guest of the Danish Free Press Society. Its president, Lars Hedegaard, has just been fined 5,000 kroner under the Danish penal code for “[issuing] a pronouncement or other communication by which a group of persons are threatened, insulted or denigrated due to their race, skin colour, national or ethnic origin, religion or sexual orientation.” This was over some remarks he made about Islam’s treatment of women in a private conversation that was, unbeknown to him, recorded and then uploaded to the Internet.

The Muslim world is certainly “getting to Denmark.” It’s also getting to the Netherlands, to Austria, to France, and beyond. In Scandinavia and in other advanced Western societies, the state grows ever bolder in constraining freedom of expression and other core Western liberties. In the interests of enforcing the state religion of a hollow and delusional “multiculturalism,” basic tenets of Fukuyama’s “rule of law” — including due process, the truth as defense, and equality before the law — are tossed aside in the multiculti version of heresy trials. As recent decisions in Michigan suggest, America is not immune to this trend.

(via Kathy Shaidle)

(DISCREET PLUG ALERT: I’ll be speaking about this, and about bin Laden and the big picture, at Oberlin College tomorrow night, if you’re in the Greater Ohio region.)

New on The Corner. . .


COMMENTS   16

EXPAND  

   05/04/11 08:17

"Fukuyama treats this as the logical endpoint of social development"

Spend six months or so reading a Danish newspaper regularly and draw your own conclusions-

External Link 

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Sage
   05/04/11 08:19

It's astounding that Fukuyama would failed to have notice another really remarkable thing about Denmark--its ethnic, linguistic, and religious homogeneity, its common culture, its common history, and so on and so forth. That might have a wee bit to do with it, in addition to the centuries of history and tradition that go into building a society based on mutual trust.

Of course, basically nobody with any influence acknowledges the importance of these things.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   05/04/11 08:23

Let's pretend that this fantasy Denmark is the goal - - it also requires something else to be viable. A large free nation across the sea willing to defend it when its multi-culti-ness makes it hollow and weak. Denmark alone would have been overrun long-ago. Western countries like Denmark are like 30 year olds living with their parents. Free to smoke dope in the basement and contemplate the universe in your thumbnail because Dad upstairs went to work today and mom went shopping and filled the fridge.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   05/04/11 08:30

Fukuyama misses the two most important points when he lists “Denmarkness requires three things: functioning states, rule of law, and accountable government.” Denmarkness also requires, before these admittedly desirable things, trustworthy neighbors (I suspect that Fukuyama would never use Israel as his model society no matter how it excelled in accountable government and rule of law) and a world-order that allows small states their independence (this is why Fukuyama chooses Denmark rather than Delaware as his model).

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   05/04/11 09:33

As Mr. Steyn would be the first to point out, nations like Denmark can't be the end point, because once nations "get to Denmark" they stop reproducing themselves. Whether what comes next is an Islamic state or a revitalized European Christian society, or something in between or completely different, what Mr. Fukuyama means by "Denmark" can't hold.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   05/04/11 09:57

"its ethnic, linguistic, and religious homogeneity, its common culture, its common history, and so on and so forth."

The Scandinavian countries draw a large amount of immigrants who come there, it seems, solely to take advantage of the welfare systems.

These ain't Danes, Norwegians or Swedes, they're people who move in and demand to recreate the medieval squalor from whence they came.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
 gs
   05/04/11 10:38

"It took the best part of a decade for Francis Fukuyama’s “End of History” to be chewed up and spit out by a resurgent Islam."

A resurgent Islam was unnecessary. The book's title struck me as so flagrantly ridiculous that I resolved to pay no further attention to Fukuyama. I have succeeded pretty well, and apparently haven't missed much.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   05/04/11 10:40

Denmark is extremely homogeneous, especially by American and British standards. It has some of the tougher immigration policies in Europe. It tightened its asylum and family reunification laws in 2001, resulting in an 82% drop in asylum permits and a 70% drop in visas issued under family reunification policies.

External Link 

Funny how the very societies both the Left and Right hold up as models are all far more homogeneous than the one they achieve to create here - Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Israel, Japan, Germany, etc.

External Link 

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   05/04/11 10:47

The more theoretical Fukuyama is, the better. This is why "Denmark" is a lousy book and "The End of History" is still quite good. I am not sure the thesis he offered is even of the provable/disprovable variety - certainly not within 21 years as it dealt with the end of history in a teleological sense.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   05/04/11 12:46

I am curious what the "greater Ohio region" consists of?

Everything but Cleveland?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Adam
   05/04/11 13:35

Fukuyama belongs in the same category as Krugman: Always fact-free and always wrong.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Andreas
   05/04/11 14:22

I noticed that racial and cultural homogeneity wasn't among the three things Denmark needs. I guess European countries have to get rid of their European heritage or else guys named Fukuyama would have a tough time fitting in and an even tougher time spreading propaganda. Although I don't know anything about him, apparently he's an American; It wouldn't surprise me if he thought America was too European and needed to be more inclusive.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Chas
   05/04/11 19:25

If any of you would read Fukuyama rather than sneer at what you (mistakenly) assume he's said, you might learn something. But that would take awhile. Much easier to click on to the next item, perhaps it will help reinforce what you already think.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
fisherofsouls
   05/05/11 08:56

SeanB has it exactly right. Human nature being what it is, the effete and cultured are granted permission to be weak only by the sympathetic strong. Without the US backing them up, Danes (in fact all of Western Europe), would have become Soviet subjects by 1950 at the latest.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Bill H
   05/09/11 22:00

As an avid fan of Steyn and a fan of Fukuyama I hate to have to pick sides in this. Mark, the Islamic insurgency has not proven Fukuyama wrong - he discusses Islam extensively in his End Of History. The recent uprisings in the Arab world (Libya, Tunisia, Egypt, Syria, etc.) do, however, lend considerable evidence for his theory.

Denmark is not the disaster you make it out to be. Is it moving in the wrong direction, absolutely. Is liberty under attack everywhere in the West absolutely. Are we becoming a Dhimmocracy (I just made that one up), no doubt. But Fukuyama's larger point is correct.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Mads Michelsen
   12/04/11 09:49

1) The 'private conversation' was an interview with a LH-friendly webzine. Hedegaard contended that he wasn't aware that it was for publication. Ultimately, the court did not find this credible. The webzine itself refers to the 'private conversation'' as an interview. (External Link )

2) "Some remarks", indeed. He claimed as a fact and as a general rule, that muslim girls were raped by their "fathers, uncles and cousins". He supported this claim by saying: "You hear that all the time".

3) I appreciate that things get lost in translation. That is no excuse for sloppy journalism.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact