Google+
Close

The Corner

The one and only.

Re: The Mahdi vs. Bin Laden



Text  



Michael: Nice piece. I had some similar reflections on the parallels between the Mahdi and bin Laden yesterday over on Power Line, and also a few weeks after 9/11 in The Weekly Standard. Above all, everyone ought to get the revised, unabridged version of The River War when it is finally issued, if for no other reason than because it has this passage from Churchill that does not appear in most editions of The River War (long story about this):

How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property—either as a child, a wife, or a concubine—must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen: all know how to die. But the influence of the religion paralyzes the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proseltyzing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science—the science against which it had vainly struggled—the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.



Text  


Sign up for free NR e-mails today:

Subscribe to National Review