House Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio) will mark out a firm Republican position regarding the debt ceiling in his speech this evening at the Economic Club of New York (7 p.m., watch live here). He will insist that while allowing the country to default would be “irresponsible,” voting to raise the debt limit without spending cuts and reforms would be far worse in terms of the economic consequences.
Most significantly, the speaker will demand that any increase to the debt limit be offset by spending cuts of a greater amount. “Without significant spending cuts and reforms to reduce our debt, there will be no debt limit increase,” Boehner plans to say, according to excerpts obtained by National Review Online. “And the cuts should be greater than the accompanying increase in debt authority the president is given. We should be talking about cuts of trillions, not just billions.”
In other words, if President Obama wants to be able to borrow trillions more (and he does), he will have to consider meaningful reforms to entitlement programs — the primary drivers of the country’s debt problem — in exchange for Republican votes.
The measures attached to a debt ceiling increase, Boehner will say, “should be actual cuts and program reforms, not broad deficit or debt targets that punt the tough questions to the future,” and everything is on the table except tax increases, including “honest conversations about how best to preserve Medicare.” Consider that yet another push back against the conventional media narrative that Republicans had “given up” on Medicare reform. “[W]ith millions of Baby Boomers beginning to retire, the status quo [on Medicare] is unsustainable,” Boehner will say.
On taxes, the speaker will reiterate the Republican position that higher taxes will have adverse effects on job creation and economic growth. “Balancing the budget requires spending cuts and economic growth,” he plans to say. “We won’t have economic growth if we raise taxes and fail to address the drivers of our debt. The mere threat of tax hikes causes uncertainty for job creators — uncertainty that results in less risk-taking and fewer jobs.”
Boehner will also go after the Obama administration’s energy policies, claiming that it is “simply untrue” that nothing can be done to reign in rising fuel prices. “Washington has also kept most of our nation’s vast energy resources under lock and key for decades, over the clear objections of the American people — the people who own those resources. If we had listened to the people decades ago — or even a few years ago — many of these resources would be available to us right now to lower the price of energy.”
The current debt limit of $14.3 trillion is expected to be reached shortly, and Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner recently floated an increase of $2 trillion in order to meet the government’s obligations into early 2013. Geithner had urged action from Congress before May 16 but since extended the deadline to August 2.
The GOP should insist on a "twofer".....two dollars in spending cuts over 5 years for every dollar of increase in the debt ceiling. If Dems. can't live with that, they deserve no special dispensation from the GOP that allows them to live beyond their means. America will understand, and applaud, that argument.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe key to knowing whether the Republican leadership is actually serious about these "trillions" in cuts, is how much will they insist be cut now, and from what starting point. Politicians of both parties are great in legislating "cuts" that take place 3, 5 or 10 years from now (or even 12 in Obama's latest "plan"). But such cuts are meaningless. I will believe Boehner and co. are serious when they insist/hold out for a trillion or two in real actual cuts - from last years levels, not from the massively inflated baseline - over the next two to three years.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseBoehner and Cantor.
All hat, no cattle.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseTo me, this is the moment we'll see if the GOP leadership truly understands and appreciates what happened last November,
I will make my decision on whether the current GOP leadership is serious about cutting the debt based on how Boehner and the Repubs handle this debt limit increase battle, and that in turn will help decide who I will/won't support for the WH in 2012.
This is not an idle threat. I plan to donate dozens of dollars to the proper candidate. DOZENS.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe GOP should approach this with the mentality "We're going to lose the White House in 2012" (even though I still think the GOP has a good shot at knocking Obama off.)
It's amazing how principled we become when we're not obsessed with the next election. Republicans in Congress would NEVER have approved TARP had they known Obama was going to win in 2008. It was purely done to help bolster McCain, and it blew up in their faces.
At some point the adults need to cut up Obama's credit card. I say we draw a line in the sand now. Let the MSM gnash it's teeth at Congressional Republicans (they'll do that no matter what) At the end of the day, the economy's performance will rest on Obama's shoulder's, not Boehner's.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI think Boehner's statement is good because it uses the Dems' own sloppiness to push the debate in our favor. The "deficit" is different from the "debt." Every year the Congress spends in deficit, which adds to the national debt. The Progressive MSM (I know, redundant) is sloppy with the use of the terms "deficit" and "debt"- they are often (mis)used interchangeably.
Boehner says the Dems have to agree to cut this year's spending by an amount equal to or greater than the increase to the debt limit. But the debt limit is equal to multiple years' worth of deficit spending. Which means the Dems have to agree to cut multiple years' worth of spending.
You never get everything you want in politics. But even if the GOP compromises, the starting point of negotiations is closer to their position than it is to the Dems' position. For that reason I think this is a good tactic on Boehner's part to push the result in the direction we want.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseStatements about what the other guy will "have to do" are nonsense. Obama doesn't have to do anything, and in fact will not.
The debt limit will be increased because yes, without it the US treasury will default on its obligations. And playing games with that is reckless and irresponsible and stupid.
Vote to cut spending, definitely. If Obama wants to veto those cuts he can, and can take responsibility for the results. But the Republicans need to vote to raise the debt ceiling and do it yesterday.
Meanwhile, I hate to break it to you, but essential entitlement reform at the present time also means higher payroll taxes, because the current ones do not cover the cost of entitlements. And there isn't any general revenue to make up the difference.
Pretending the government can be run with revenues only at 15% of GDP while spending is at 25% of GDP is pretending and it is nonsense. And no amount of grandstanding or blame games can change that. It is mere arithmetic. Revenues have to go up, not down, from here. Yes, in addition to spending going down and going down a lot.
The political class lost the option to choose between them, let alone fight over it forever while doing nothing, about five exits back. Now it is do both rapidly or go to a warm place, together...
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseOh, great. Bohner's gonna agree to something that the Democrats promise to do, just to get "Lucy-ed" and have the football taken away. Nice.
@JasonC:
*HEAD EXPLODES*
(don't say I didn't warn you)
Not raising the debt limit (i.e., hitting the limit on your credit card) IS NOT THE SAME as defaulting on it (i.e., not making the interest payment).
Sheesh - can people PLEASE start getting this right?
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse