My biggest reservation about Paul Ryan’s “Path to Prosperity” has been that it was an economic plan only Paul Ryan could sell. But the House Budget chairman’s non-wonky, plainspoken defense of the PTP today before the Economic Club of Chicago has put those concerns to rest. It was deep-dish speech that hit the spot for those of us hungry for a comprehensive response to the distortions and deceptions hurled at him and his blueprint.
Ryan highlighted four foundations of growth: 1) controlling health-care costs; 2) eliminating bad regulations; 3) keeping taxes low; and 4) getting the Federal Reserve to focus on stable prices rather than juicing job growth. Good stuff, but more interesting was his defense of his Medicare plan, savaged by Democrats and, recently, Newt Gingrich.
2012 GOP candidates should memorize this hunk:
The President’s plan begins with trillions of dollars in higher taxes, and it relies on a plan to control costs in Medicare that would give a board of 15 unelected bureaucrats in Washington the power to deeply ration care. This would disrupt the lives of those currently in retirement and lead to waiting lists for today’s seniors. … The disagreement isn’t really about the problem. It’s about the solution to controlling costs in Medicare.
And if I could sum up that disagreement in a couple of sentences, I would say this: Our plan is to give seniors the power to deny business to inefficient providers. Their plan is to give government the power to deny care to seniors.
… That’s the real class warfare that threatens us — a class of governing elites picking winners and losers, and determining our destinies for us.
Even better was his explanation of a key difference between Ryanomics and Obamanomics — an emphasis on creating prosperity and growth, not just muddling through the sort of perpetual austerity predicted by Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s IMF bureaucrats and Washington’s left-of-center consensus.
Ryan believes and persuasively argues that the American formula of bottom-up, entrepreneurial capitalism is still relevant. It’s why we’re still the Exceptional Nation. “Radical change?” What in the world was Gingrich talking about?
Who can sell this plan better than Ryan? I've heard many claims as to why Ryan should not be the GOP nominee for president for 2012, but none of them are convincing.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI could be wrong, but the Reagan and Kemp statues took on a bigger smile after that speech.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseRyan want to spend some time with his kids. What better than a job where you can work from home?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseGood God, I just heard Newt on Hannity...what a maroon. Shawn was way too soft on him. Newt's response was nutty and didn't do a thing to alleviate what he said this weekend. Gingrich should just hang it up now.
Ryan, I wish he'd run for president, but if he runs for senate, I'll count myself as lucky to finally be able to give the guy my vote. He'd be a great senator, I just don't know if he's more powerful in the house in his current position. We need the guy in a position of power.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbusePlease run Mr. Ryan, please run.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAll Gingrich is doing is trying to crawl back onto the political game board, make himself relevant again. He has denigrated Ryan and his plan. The plan is too radical, and Ryan hasn't thought it through. On Hannity this afternoon (radio), Gingrich said he'd be happy to sit down with Ryan and work on the Ryan plan with him. Well, heck yes, I'm sure he would. Then he could start calling it the Ryan-Gingrich Plan. Then the Gingrich-Ryan Plan. Note that Gingrich offers no specifics, just a call for more 'conversation'.
Newt - if you want to be part of the congressional GOP effort to write a viable budget plan, run for a CD or senate in Georgia, OK? I'm pretty sure Ryan, Boehner, et al, can handle things without your lobs from your publicist's office.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseMisrepresentation and manipulation are an integral part of our political system and the biggest danger our nation faces is an electorate that can't distinguish between the politically expedient headline and the facts buried at the end of the article. Claiming seniors will die sooner because of Paul Ryan's budget plan is a reprehensible lie, but it makes a great headline and lots of folks will buy it.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseCactus Bill - I'd be willing to bet that Paul Ryan, Sr is smiling an "atta' boy...Hey, everybody, that's my son" from the other side as well.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseBurton,
You want a convincing argument why Ryan should be the GOP nominee?
- Because he would absolutely crush Obama
He is smarter, more prepared and more articulate than the current occupant of the White House. He will not back down from Obama's straw man arguments and he will destroy him on the facts in a debate.
That's why.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseNewt! Please exit stage left...
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI want Paul Ryan as my President.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseCould NRO do a story on why Paul Ryan isn't running for president? Or what the Republican Party isn't begging him to run?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbusePaul Ryan for President
Chris Christie for Vice President
Any objections?
This ticket would take 49 states.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbusePaul Ryan has missed the point in the current presidential outlook. Whether he planned it, or likes it or not...
Right now he IS the nominee. He is THE narrative of current policy debate. He is the framed of the issues. He is the VOICE of the Republican party right now. There is him and then a big pile of "other" when it comes to Republican prospects for President.
I believe he will either get it and run and we have a chance to beat Obama. Or he will choose to not run and we will lose.
When it comes down to it, his life's work up to now and all the time he has put into this coming dept crisis will be a failure unless he takes up the challenge and beats Obama himself.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe way it will be:
Sarah Palin will announce her intentions later in the primary season. Why? Because she is a Mamma Griz and she is waiting for just the right time to pounce.
Already you are seeing the blow-hards shooting themselves out of the race. I'm speaking of Trump, Newt, and Mitt. Trump and Huck are already gone, Newt and Mitt are as good as gone.
Palin doesn't need to seek name recognition like TimPaw, Herman Cann, and Bachmann. For better or worse, Palin's name is well known. So she won't have spend money on that like the others do. She will be able to save her money for the general election.
Palin's biggest nemesis, the media, has changed since 2008 too. They have en masse dropped any pretense of objectivity. It isn't just Palin who gets the "treatment" but the entire slate of GOP candidates. With implications of racism (most recently yesterday on MTP with Newt), the media has gone further off the rails to being on the offense in defense of Obama. The further into the primaries the more the media will be perceived as trying to determine the election instead of any pretense of objective reporting. Just wait until the primary debates!
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseDianeinWA I stand most humbly corrected.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbusePaul Ryan's plan is a good start, and I tend to agree with the fine fellow who confronted Newt in Iowa-he needs to quit now and stick to writing Civil War books.
I don't think Ryan's plan goes far enough. We need to get the Federal government out of the health care business. Medicare needs to become more subsidy based, and eventually turned over to the states for them to alter, administer, or eliminate as they see fit. Medicaid needs to go back to the states outright as well.
No one over 55 or so should see too many changes, they have paid into this boondoogle too long. But it needs to go away.
Same with Social Security. Gradually extend the retirement ages and reduce the benfits for those under 55 to a point where it doesn't exist anymore for those under 30 or 35. We aren't counting on it anyway.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseRyan-Rubio ticket
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe complete and utter thrashing Newt has taken in the past 24 hours should make it apparent to the GOP field that there is broad and very deep support for Paul Ryan and his PTP budget plan. My hope is that it convinces Rep. Ryan to run; however, at a minimum it serves notice to those candidates who would undermine him and the House members that have courageously stood with him on the budget.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseMr. Ryan,
As Reagan quoted (in his 1981 Notre Dame speech) the so eloquent Churchill, "“When great causes are on the move in the world, we learn we are spirits, not animals, and that something is going on in space and time, and beyond space and time, which, whether we like it or not, spells duty.”
Your country needs you. to. be. President. Please hear and answer that duty call.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse