by Andrew Stuttaford
Jonah, I’d agree there is something more than a little off about that piece by Bernard-Henri Lévy, but at the same time here and there he does have a point. Specifically, I’ve long thought that the carefully choreographed degradation that accompanies an arraignment (the perp walk, the often clearly unecessary use of handcuffs  and so on) is a spectacle of humiliation that fits very uneasily with innocent-until-proved-guilty, and not only symbolically so. The jury needs to be persuaded by what goes on in the court room, not by the theatrics that may precede it.

The Corner

The one and only.