In a much-touted speech today bearing the modest title of “Remarks by the President on the Middle East and North Africa,” Barack Obama responded to the Arab revolt of the past five months with elements of common sense and even eloquence (“through the moral force of nonviolence, the people of the region have achieved more change in six months than terrorists have accomplished in decades”). He also defined a U.S. policy in support of reform and against violence I find worthy of discussion and debate.
But the president, ever in thrall to the illusion of “linkage,” stepped on his lines by devoting the final fifth of his speech to the Arab–Israeli conflict and articulating principles that, in the words of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy’s Robert Satloff, “constitute a major departure from long-standing U.S. policy.”
That departure is not for the better; one line sums up Obama’s mistake: “The status quo is unsustainable, and Israel#…#must act boldly to advance a lasting peace.” Note how he demands that Israel alone “must act boldly,” code words for making concessions to enemies sworn to eliminate the Jewish state.
This is not policy; this is folly.
Notice also that the President continued his tradition of shooting off his mouth and asking questions later.
Just as he spouted off about the Cambridge Police without having all the facts, he decided to UNILATERALLY make his declarations today, while Bebe was getting ready to hop on the plane to come to Washington. So without even holding serious face to face discussions with our long time ally, he goes out and makes a fool of himself.
Obama is worse than Carter! At least Carter got a doable agreement with Egypt.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseMr. Pipes not only gives a pass, but even claims to find "eloquence" in the Post-American-in-Chief's “through the moral force of nonviolence, the people of the region have achieved more change in six months than terrorists have accomplished in decades”.
When you examine that statement for even half a second, you see how monstrous it actually is: As the unerring Mark Levin pointed out on his radio show last night, it posits that the goals of the "non-violent" people of, for example, Tahrir Square and those of the terrorists are the same.
Well guess what, pilgrims -- events are, horrifyingly, proving this to be the case.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIt has been jokingly noted that Obama should run the UN or just given an honorific title like King. Given his policies, he's doing his best to ensure that the 'Caliphate' returns. Thus, I think 'Caliph' might be a better fit for our dear leader....then again, 'Dear Leader' as in a God-like being might work...or....
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse