In his column today, E.J. argues that it is a sign of America’s yawning “imagination deficit” that we aren’t copying China and Europe more by spending more on trains, roads, etc. Apparently socialized medicine is really clever and groundbreaking stuff. He also invokes a bunch of big business CEOs who want more taxpayer subsidies for products that are “profitable” only because they are heavily subsidized both on the production side and the demand side. Oh, and it shows how unimaginative we are that we aren’t taxing people more, too.
Corporatism, statism, higher taxes, mimicking Europe and authoritarian regimes, and spending a lot more on roads and locomotives: What original, outside-the-box thinking! It’s almost like E.J. doesn’t realize these ideas are over a century old.
Ideas that are over a century old? Leave off locomotives and the reference to Europe and the age of these notions can be measured in millennia rather than centuries. However, that doesn't make them wrong; fortunately we have history to teach us that.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseBravo
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"Imagine" ≠ "Invent"
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIt's part and parcel of the Leftist mindset: if you disagree with me, you're mentally deficient in some way (and probably evil).
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe General Rule of Lefties™ holds here. Whatever accusation they are making is more accurately applied to the Left. In this case, the lack of imagination applies squarely to the Left. They have not had a new idea in over a century.
The same is true of the Medicare attack. It is the Left who seeks to kill off Medicare. Obama made that clear when threatening to deny his grandmother a hip transplant. Yet, they point the finger at the Right.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"The report quoted Mark Pinto, executive vice president of Applied Materials, who said that in solar power, the United States is "neither the largest in manufacturing nor the largest market.' He added: "That’s very unusual.'"
Solar would've been an EXCELLENT idea...for Reagan to trick the Soviets into developing as the "next big thing" in order to deplete their hard currency and speed their collapse.
Unfortunately, even they weren't that gullible.
There is no market for solar here because other energy sources are cheaper and more reliable. Why buy something that ALMOST pays for itself right about the time the panels wear out and need to be replaced?
The only real customer of solar here is government, which buys it as a political fad. That isn't a market. A market is when it makes economic sense for individuals to mount them in their yards and on their roofs--without the enticement of a tax credit.
And a market means that fossil fuel sources of energy were not first made prohibitively expensive by taxes and artificial mandates in order to "drive" us to solar power.
There are economic realities that cannot be imagined over or around.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseBravo.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseE.J. also points out Russia spends more on their roads and highways than we do.
Of course they do, you dolt! We established all our highways 50 years ago. If you travel 50 miles from Moscow you very likely are no longer driving on a paved surface!
They have to spend more to replace all that crumbling infrastructure from their "imaginative" experiment with collectivism and central planning.
And South Korea has more internet access in homes than we do? Funny, but I have internet access WHEREVER I go, 24 hours a day, through my cell phone. Why do I need an additional source for it?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseHave you been to Russia? Because if you had you would realize that your comment is total nonsense. Russian roads aren't always exemplars of modern construction, particularly in rural areas, but it is laughable to suggest that if you are "50 miles from Moscow you are no longer on a paved surface."
More likely that they spend more on roads because it's a much larger geographical country that, by extension, requires greater road spending.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseOur Jonah generally keeps his equilibrium, something that is not necessary for pajama monkeys but is absolutely necessary for serious players in our national conversation.
This morning, however, I detect a bristling contempt that can hardly contain itself. Good on you, Jonah! Sometimes we all need to let it out a little bit.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseToo bad Dionne didn't have a chance to talk to my Bavarian friend while he was here visiting last week. The whole week he marveled at how good our roads are and that "they go everywhere." He compared prices wherever we went, and prices for all kinds of goods in the U.S. nearly always came out better. He complained about how they pay more for their health care because they are subsidizing those who don't pay anything. Sound familiar? He's a farmer and businessman who is burdened by overregulation--even more than here. He was stressed about the Greens winning yet another election and said two nuclear plants have already shut down. It makes no sense, he said, when well-built and safe German plants are shut down to then buy power from neighboring former Soviet satellites with unsafe plants. Sound familiar? My friend is so exasperated that he said if the Greens win anymore elections, he might just have to immigrate to the U.S. Oh, and they drive to Austria for their diesel because it's much cheaper. It seems to me that people like Dionne might spend a little more time talking to people other than those who agree with them.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe lust of the Left to tell others what to do is unbounded and insatiable. They are the original prom committee chairgirls.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIt boils down to central planning. While the Chinese have embraced "state capitalism", they can't let go of central planning. Think their high speed rail is as good as Obama says it is? Guess again External Link
Obama and the progressives can't just decree something be done like the Chinese (but Obama is trying), but rather create "markets" by distorting the formerly free market to favor their hearts' desire. Central planning seems to be such a natural tendency of government that we violate our own constitution to do it.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"It’s almost like E.J. doesn’t realize these ideas are over a century old."
Yep, and hardly surprising that he doesn't.
//
BTW, K-Lo, how about losing this current system of Captcha nonsense. Enough commercials already!
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseOver a century to say the least. The basics of corporatism, statism, higher taxes, mimicking authoritarian regimes, and spending a lot more on roads are several millenia old.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIf it were up to Republicans, no money would go to our aging infrastructure. There are some things markets just don't do: roads, trains, and other public goods. Why is the Republican so opposed to even working on things that would make everyone's life easier? They don't even cost much! Instead all you can focus on is tax cuts for the rich. And you wonder why Republican support is again flagging.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThey don't even cost much! Instead all you can focus on is tax cuts for the rich.
--
Huaser, for the life of me I cannot understand why liberals cannot understand simple budget concepts. Cutting taxes does not COST anything, unless you start from the premise that all money belongs to the government in the first place. MY MONEY IS NOT YOUR MONEY.
By the way, our fed government spends and misspends billions of dollars every year, on education, on roads, and on a whole lot of transferring wealth. The country as a whole needs to get serious about government spending, or our children and grandchildren will be saddled with debt they cannot possibly pay off. Why does all good have to come from Washington?
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse>"It’s almost like E.J. doesn’t realize these ideas are over a century old."
>
>Yep, and hardly surprising that he doesn't.
Yep. Hardly surprising. Except he does recognize it. Explicitly.
Full Dionne quote, which Jonah surely had to read in order to misleading excerpt:
"Our imagination deficit is the shortfall we should worry about. We seem incapable of doing what we did in the Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson and, yes, Nixon years: imagining how practical public action could make our citizens’ lives better, our country stronger and our private economy more productive."
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI will give you Eisenhower because of the freeway system, although is there anything else of consequence he did as President? And what did Truman, Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon do that was so great? I will not give an inch on Johnson whose big liberal ideas are part of what is bankrupting our country currently.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse@13:11
Yep, visited St. Petersburg and its environs in 2000.
Google "Russian Road Highway" and get back to me.
Also, now that more white people in Russia can afford cars than blacks under apartheid in South Africa (in Soviet days this was not the case), they are probably discovering that people like to drive places.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse