Before we all ride the Palin-Revere fiasco utterly into the ground, it’s worth noting what she really got wrong, and what the rest of us did as well.
Sarah Palin said that Paul Revere “warned the British that they weren’t gonna be taking away our arms, by ringing those bells and making sure, as he’s riding his horse through town, to send those warning shots and bells that we were gonna be secure and we were gonna be free.”
As the author of a book about Revere’s life, when I heard this, I groaned. From Revere’s own account, it’s clear that he didn’t fire a shot, he didn’t ring a bell, and he didn’t intend to warn the British of anything (unless you count the townsfolk as British, which they technically were for a little while longer).
The unarmed Revere left Boston in total silence. He muffled the oars of his boat as men rowed him to Charlestown, and he rode in silence after leaving Charlestown by horseback. He was, after all, on a secret mission to alert John Hancock and Samuel Adams in Lexington that they were in danger.
Only after scaring up two redcoats on horseback and turning away to Medford did he begin waking the countryside. He first woke the militia captain in Medford and then rode to Lexington raising the alarm — by shouting, mind you, not shooting or ringing bells.
In short, Palin basically got the whole story wrong. So people piled on to imply that she was ignorant, dumb, daffy, whatever. Most quotes of her comments even featured the uh’s and um’s which, for simple courtesy’s sake, are usually removed from transcribed comments. Everyone looks dimwitted on the page when umm-ing unevenly through a statement.
But that, of course, wasn’t the end. Palin doggedly insisted that she was right, that she knew her history better than her detractors.
That’s when the counterattack was launched, and so we must return to Revere’s famous ride.
Revere made it to Lexington and then later set off for Concord, stirring up the countryside, but was captured about halfway there. While in British custody, Revere warned his captors about mobilizing militias.
Not much to work with, really, but this is politics. Palin’s defenders jumped in to say, See! She was right all along. Never mind that he only warned the redcoats because he was captured; it had nothing to do with his original mission. Never mind that his warning did not come while riding through town and was attended by neither gunfire nor the peal of bells.
A gun was heard as Revere and his captors came back toward Lexington — fired by the Minute Men massing in the town. The redcoats, spooked, took off and left Revere to find his way back on foot.
It was a harrowing night for Revere. Meanwhile, our episode is thoroughly absurd. Palin got the story wrong. Big deal. It’s not worth mocking her and saying she’s a dummy. Nor is it worth trying to pull her bacon out of the fire with a lame and halfblind excuse for how she was really correct, sort of, if you look at it from the right angle, while basically ignoring her actual words. Both sides look foolish.
Palin should have been humble and admitted she got the story wrong. She could have spun it to say that she got the spirit of the thing right. She could have done a lot of things. But persisting in a flashing-neon error as she’s done is prideful, and that kind of pigheadedness is very unattractive in someone vying for public office. Sarah’s sin was in her lack of humility.
But then there’s us, we who revel in the cheap shot and the takedown. People make mistakes. People say cockamamie things. But high-vaulting and jumping down their throats is rarely called for. Still, we’ve cultivated a whole media culture of such acrobatics. That is also prideful and unattractive.
— Joel J. Miller is the author of The Revolutionary Paul Revere and the vice president of editorial and acquisitions at Thomas Nelson Publishers.
A totally high-minded, yet in typical NRO fashion, utterly cowardly essay. You guys blew it, and your elitism wont allow you to admit it.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseHow, exactly, did anyone blow it? Other than Palin, who for someone who traipses her patriotism and the Founders out every five minutes seems to know nothing about what they did, said, or wrote down in that pesky Constitution.
And as far as "elitism" goes...I think this word has been bandied about so much it has lost all meaning. Elitism is not just the belief that some people are better than others. That's just reality. Get over it. There are people out there who know more than you (or I, for that matter). Get over it. There are people who are stronger, faster, better educated, better trained, and just downright better. Get over it.
This is not elitism. Elitism is those "better" people getting more rights and privileges...and that's not going on here. If anything, the gross anti-intellectualism in this country makes the more educated and intelligent hide their gifts in order to fit in. America does not, as a whole, reward intelligence or creativity; anyone who claims that there is an intellectual elite ruling the country hasn't been paying attention to the choices of this country, which would make a slightly brain-damaged fifth-grader say, "That's sthupid!"
Expecting someone making a claim to either know what the hell they are talking about or accept correction isn't elitism...it's simple human civilization. It's how we got this far...by expecting people to be right or to shut the hell up and sit down. Since she obviously doesn't know anything about American history she should either 1) study it or 2) stop trying to use it as a political tool.
So where, exactly, did anyone blow it except Palin?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWho blew what? Did I miss an NRO article where they took her to task for this?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI think there are legit criticisms of Sarah Palin to be made; but blowing these semantic nitpicks out of all proportion just makes her detractors seem as deranged as the Uterus-Obsessed Andrew Sullivan.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseShe's not dumb for saying "Revere warned the British." Anyone might make that flub after hearing the words "Revere", "warned" and "British" all afternoon.
And media could have kindly quoted her as saying "warned [of] the British."
But to stand by her words instead of admitting the obvious? That's not adult behavior.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"But persisting in a flashing-neon error as she’s done is prideful, and that kind of pigheadedness is very unattractive in someone vying for public office.'
Makes no difference, John. Palin's negatives are already so high that she will not lose any more support by persisting in her mistake. I think she knows that, which is exactly why she persists. What does she have to lose?
And her supporters will still scream "unfair!" There's no downside in not admitting the slip-up.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThis is really just stupid. First of all, maybe she goofed as she is wont to do and of course, she'll never back down.
Having said that, do you honestly think that if you went to the streets and asked 20 people who was Paul Revere, when did he live, what did he do - more than 2 (if that) would be able to answer any or all of those questions accurately?
This kind of gotcha is great for the MSM to berate someone with - oh she's so stupid she doesn't even know about Lexington/Concord or Paul Revere. However, the average person is going huh?
Personally I wouldn't vote for Sarah Palin in the primary, but if it's Obama v Palin - she's my gal all the way!
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe "gotcha" question was: "What have you seen so far today, and what are you going to take away from your visit?"
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI don't blame the former govenor of Alaska. I really don't know much about Revere other than what I learnt in 4th grade. But then again, I'm not a politician. She is no worse than Biden, or for that matter our President. But I think it is time she hires some kind of consultant (one she can trust and who will not break the bank). Reagan made all kinds of gaffs (as do they all). At some point, having a person who can at least fact check these kind of speeches before they go viral isn't a bad idea.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseExternal Link
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThat's our new standard? The average idiot on the street doesn't know so how could a possible presidential candidate be expected to know? What exacting demands we have on our candidates.
How does an adult with any semblance of education not know this answer to this?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThank you for this.
I *like* Palin, but Palin said something dumb, she doubled-down, and her supporters take solace from the stretching of technicalities.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseRI agree the big gaffe is the lack of humility. But Paul Revere is a 3rd grade standard in GA. Pretty much all of the 3rd graders in GA should know she was wrong.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThat's pretty much game-set-match, I would say.
Re: the "gotcha journalism" complaint, I'm not sympathetic in this instance. After all, it is Palin who decided to embark on this "One Nation" tour of historical sites of the Founding, and it is Palin who has elbowed her way to the front of the Tea Party parade. If you're going to drape yourself in the flag, don't be surprised if someone asks why you're wearing a flag.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbusePalin's problem wasn't that she got her facts wrong. A charitable "hearing" of what she said bears up under scrutiny. Revere did "warn" the British, though that wasn't what he set out to do, and he (and his fellow riders) did trigger a warning system of bells and gun shots.
Unfortunately, her garbled telling of the story--she looked very distracted to me--gave her critics room to call her on what she said.
I didn't hear what she said on Fox News, so I won't comment there.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIsn't her sell-by date past? Sadly, it appears that her fresh and bright aura was an optical illusion...an illusion generated by proximity to John McCain.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI'm still having difficulty seeing what she got "wrong."
The reporter had asked what Palin had learned that day.
Why is it surprising that Palin skipped the Longfellow account and recited a somewhat oscure fact she may have just learned, especially when that fact ties into her "campaign" theme?
It's not like she got it woorng with respect to Revere's warning once he had been captured.
Which leaves us with the "by ringing those bells and making sure as he’s riding his horse through town to send those warning shots and bells that we were going to be secure" line which does not specifically mention that Revere was the one performing these actions related to the actions being taken by the colonists to prepare for the British regulars.
This is extemporaneous speech and you give the speaker the benefit of the doubt (and remove the ums and uhs). Palin's speech is easily parsed into an historically accurate statement.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe nerve of this Miller guy, usin' all his fancy book-learnin' to impugn the accuracy of Sarah's statements. How dare he?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThat he warned the British was more than I knew. Sounds like a very minor gaffe on her part.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIts not something major, like not knowing there are 50 states...
Oops, I made a flashing-neon mistake, calling Joel "John". Got my NRO Millers confused.
Sorry about that.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse