I didn’t run for Congress because of sex scandals.
After 40 years of building and running companies, my retirement was focused on my family and well-earned quiet. My wife, Peggy; lots of grandkids; some golf and tennis; the occasional trip; and managing my business interests were all I needed. My retirement was interrupted when a runaway Congress and an ideological president began “radically transforming America.” Within two years, we saw wealth devalued, the dollar weakened, housing and stocks crumbled, manufacturing crippled, and economic growth suffocated by a series of decisions that never should have left the faculty lounge. Running for Congress was not just a choice but a duty.
No decent person rejoices in the hardships and humiliations of others. Watching Congressman Weiner’s press conference, I didn’t rejoice in his shame. It was a sad moment for him, for his wife, for Congress. Another congressman dragged down by a scandal. It’s an old tale, and I think the American people are kind of tired of it.
I was reminded of the ending of Animal Farm, when the comrades outside the house looked through the window and were unable to differentiate the men from the pigs. Those same pigs once crafted the rule of law, codifying it with great solemnity on the side of the barn. Yet they changed the laws for personal gain, and one by one the formerly sacrosanct law morphed into nebulous “regulation” with exemptions and exceptions.
Obamacare waivers number in the thousands; Congress exempted itself right from the beginning. Faceless bureaucrats you didn’t vote for decide whether or not we can drill for oil, where Boeing can build its plant, what light bulbs we can buy. The man responsible for the IRS is a tax cheat — as is the man who once headed Ways and Means. The woman who heads HHS has no medical training and is a pro-abortion activist. A congressman with a bill about Internet regulation sends unsolicited sexual photos to college coeds.
Congress has journeyed through Animal Farm to become a Tom Wolfe novel.
One thing is telling: Scandals, no matter their nature, are not the problem. They are a symptom, representing something more dangerous: liberalism. Many liberals in Congress feed off of power. They feel entitled to dictate society’s rules, yet selectively exempt themselves from the enforcement. They live in a parallel universe where their own laws do not apply. I’m more disgusted by a congressman’s unpaid parking tickets than I am by his sexual fetishes. It’s the pigs rewriting the laws all over again.
So, I ran for Congress. And I lost. Now, in the seven months since my political career ended, I’ve enjoyed the return to retirement despite the mounting political frustration. The situation in America is worse now than it was in November 2010. The political climate in my district is now very favorable for a repeat run. But that’s not why I did it then, and not why I’d consider a return. My desire to go to Congress was to fix what’s broken and go home. End subsidies. End government dependencies. Dramatically cut the budget by 30 or 35 percent. Slash capital-gains taxes down to zero. Cut taxes across the board. The rest of America’s economic healing will happen naturally as a consequence. I suffered through Carter’s administration and saw what Reagan did to restore American prosperity. It can happen again. Congress knows what to do. Anthony Weiner knows what to do. They just don’t do it. Call it incompetence or arrogance. It’s a matter of political will, and giving up control is something few in Congress are willing to do.
America is tired of standing outside, looking in. It’s time to oust the remaining dead-weight from the House — and bring the change America so desperately needs.
— Bob Turner was Anthony Weiner’s Republican challenger in 2010.
"I’m more disgusted by a congressman’s unpaid parking tickets than I am by his s*xual fetishes."
Oh, please. I am sick of that kind of pseudo-sophisticated claptrap. Always the above-it-all pose. Can we not agree that unpaid parking tickets are terrible without pretending that behaving like a pervert is somewhat better?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbusePerhaps Mr. Turner didn’t use the best analogy to make his point, but I don’t think he intended to minimize or forgive Rep. Weiner’s bad behavior. He was simply recognizing the distinction between behaving badly and breaking the law. Liberal politicians defend personal misconduct by claiming it has no impact on their ability to perform the jobs they were elected to perform. While I don't vote for politicians who lack good character and sound judgment, lots of folks obviously aren't bothered by those personal failings. Bill Clinton is a serial adulterer and liar, but his approval rating is 60% and 60% of the American people are not liberal Democrats who voted for Bill Clinton.
The point Mr. Turner is making is that he is more concerned about a political system that allows elected officials and Presidential appointees to receive “get out of jail free” cards for illegal conduct than he is about an immature egomaniac’s inappropriate behavior. After the last 2-1/2 years, our country needs people who know the difference between serious issues that impact the American people and distractions that annoy and disappoint us. Mr. Turner sounds like he knows the difference.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIn my opinion, it isn't merely a distraction that annoys and disappoints us if a man can display pornographic pictures of his privates and remain in office. I think such behavior and such results do impact the American people by, inter alia, hastening the decline of the culture. So we just disagree.
However, I am inclined to think that Turner's turn of phrase was more of a rhetorical trick than a reflection of his actual opinion, and it is a kind of rhetorical trick I especially dislike. Either way -- whether he was attempting to sound sophisticated by suggesting that a Congressman's perversions are unimportant to him, or whether he actually doesn't care -- it is a mark against him. That doesn't mean he wouldn't be a vast improvement over Weiner.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseHardcastle, the writer is entitled to voice his opinions, and should be permitted to say it with respect, whether you are sick of it or not. If you disagree, explain why. Don't just attack. Thanks.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseA cry in the wilderness. Agree almost 100%. But you seem to think the sex scandal to be separate from all the other scandal. It's one and the same, corruption. Please refrain from the "grown-up" platitudes. The proclivity of government to overindulge isn't something that can be categorized into neat piles of the 'OK' and 'Not'. You either think the mess must be cleaned up or you don't.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWasn't it Caligula who said 'that my sex-life has no connection to how I run the empire"?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseDonM, have you not noticed that the comment section to this blog has been created for the purpose of allowing us to express our opinions? It is my strongly held opinion that it is claptrap to say, "I don't much care about the sex -- urbane boulevardier that I am -- but I am punctilious about the things that really matter, such as -- get ready for some sagacity here, that will cause you to think and think hard -- parking tickets."
That is just nonsense, and I am "entitled to voice my opinion" about it.
Thanks.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseMr. Family Values, David Vitter, was recently re-elected by Republicans.
Mr. Family Values, Newt Gingrich, is taken seriously as a Republican presidential hopeful.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"Mr. Family Values, Newt Gingrich, is taken seriously as a Republican presidential hopeful."
You really think so? Maybe by himself but not by many others. After all No Newt is good Newt.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAnd the people of the Big Apple may just re-elect Weiner. And Ginrich's political career for all practical purposes ended over a decade ago. Any other strawmen?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseHas there been any poll that puts support for Newt above 3%?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseMr. Turner's SOTC is very much on point. While I cannot vote for him, I hope he will give serious consideration to another run. And win.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseMr. Turner,
You are correct, the problem is with corruption. What causes corruption? Power. What gives one power? Money.
Thus, money corrupts.
But your party believes that money is speech. Thus, according to your party, speech corrupts. But that is wrong.
We need to separate money from speech. When we do that, perhaps we can separate the government from corruption.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSo the way to free govt from corruption is to make sure that no one who disagrees with you has the ability to influence govt.
How liberal of you.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI think the issue here is AW's judgement (or lack thereof). Like Foley, Lee, and Sanford, AW set himself up for black mail. And while many no long consider the old "conduct unbecoming.." refrain, there should be at least a modicum of decore in our lawmakers. There is an old latin phrase: "Quod licet Jovi non licet bovi." What is allowed Jupiter is not allowed to the ox. But the reverse holds true: What is allowed the ox is not allowed Jupiter.
There are some occaisons in which we demand that our lawmakers rise above the sordid behavior of the "people" for whom they govern.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAfter reading the first sentence I thought this post was going to be a mea culpa. Guess not.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseLike Breaker of Horses, I too was wondering when the other shoe was going to drop after reading the first sentence: "I didn’t run for Congress because of sex scandals." It appeared that he was implying that if having a sex scandal will get you in trouble in Washington, then he was not interested in going there. Definitely an attention grabber, but not what he was trying to say...
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI thought he was trying to say that he didn't decide to challenge Wiener just because of the sex scandal.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseHardastle, parking tickets are illegal, whereas sex messaging, by and large, is not. A problem with nanny state regulation is that with so much law to run afoul of (and a good part of it vague), selective enforcement becomes a very powerful coercive tool of the authorities, if only for their own advancement. This seems to be the point Mr. Turner is making, and if so, he is spot on.
So yes, I did notice the purpose of this comments section.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSo we disagree, DonM. At least now you are joining issue rather than engaging in contentless grousing about my negative opinion of what your guy said. However, I don't see that Turner addresses your point at all. He merely says he is "more disgusted by a congressman’s unpaid parking tickets than . . . by his s*xual fetishes," and I say that that is either a stupid and ineffective rhetorical device, or else Turner has twisted values. And that is *not* to imply that I don't care about unpaid parking tickets or other violations of the law.
I would also note that many are arguing along the lines Turner takes here, except that they purport to care exclusively about the lies rather than the pictures of Weiner's pen*s. Well, Weiner's lies are not crimes, either (so far as we know at this time). Yet I agree with these people that, illegal or not, the lies are pertinent, and I imagine that you and Mr. Turner agree as well.
In sum, what I dislike is for people to go all French on us -- avoiding at all costs the criticism of any character flaw, up to and including being a pervert, as long as that character flaw has some s*x in it. If this is not a pose -- i.e., if they *really* don't care whether a Congressman has behaved like a flasher in the park, well, I don't like that either. I don't care whether the perverted behavior is legal, because I expect more of Congressmen than to be non-criminals.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse