Google+
Close

The Corner

The one and only.

More Debate Thoughts



Text  



–How weak was Romney’s answer on Afghanistan? He couched his position in favor of staying as much as possible in we’ve-got-to-get-out terms. He clearly senses which way the wind is blowing on this within the party. 

–Although Romney was strong overall, we still don’t know whether he can take a punch, since no one threw one.

–I understand why Pawlenty always brings up his working-class background. The thing is there doesn’t seem to be anything particularly working-class about him when you watch and listen to him, so I’m not sure how much  resonance his background will have.

–Pawlenty’s strategy is to appeal a little to everyone. The problem with that is that you might not appeal a lot to anyone. Last night, he seemed to fall between the cracks between Romney (more established than he is) and Bachmann (more interesting and anti-establishment than he is).

–Bachmann played well to one of her under-appreciated strengths–she’s currently in the fight, while everyone else is a former officeholder or never officeholder. (Sorry, Ron Paul fans–I put him in a separate category.) Also, the fact that she’s been in Congress for a while gives her a big advantage over Herman Cain. She knows the issues and is used to discussing them.

–I think Bachmann has a chance to speak very powerfully about the importance of marriage in this race, given that she was raised by a single mother and given what she’s done for the children of broken families.

–If Bachmann can consolidate grass roots tea-party and social-conservative support, she will be very formidable.



Text  


Sign up for free NRO e-mails today:

Subscribe to National Review