Surprise, surprise. In “a twist government number crunchers say they discovered only after the complex bill was signed,” a provision in Obamacare would allow early-retiree couples earning as much as $64,000 to join the rolls of Medicaid — that’s up to three million people. Here’s Avik Roy, and via him chief Medicare/Medicaid actuary Richard Foster, on the cost of the provision:
If we do a back-of-the-envelope calculation, in which the average annual Medicaid expenditure per early retiree is $15,000 per year, the ten-year cost of this glitch is $450 billion. “It’s almost like allowing middle-class people to qualify for food stamps, [Foster] suggested”:
“I don’t generally comment on the pros or cons of policy, but that just doesn’t make sense,” Foster said during a question-and-answer session at a recent professional society meeting…”This is a situation that got no attention at all,” added Foster. “And even now, as I raise the issue with various policymakers, people are not rushing to say … we need to do something about this.”
Indeed, administration officials and senior Democratic lawmakers say it’s not a loophole but the result of a well-meaning effort to simplify rules for deciding who will get help with insurance costs under the new health care law.
The reason for the glitch, if you can call it that, is that prior to Obamacare, retirees’ Social Security benefits were counted as income in order to determine eligibility for Medicaid. Post-PPACA, Social Security benefits are no longer counted as income for this purpose, allowing millions of additional Americans to qualify for taxpayer subsidies.
Nancy Pelosi isn’t often right, but her wisdom is again and again borne out on one topic. We passed the bill over a year ago, and we’re still finding out what’s in it.
And if we calculate it to 100 years then we can make headlines that it'll cost Trillions more ...
Good grief.
How much do all the wars cost us? Trillions.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI'm sorry - is there some expiration date for obamacare that that only you are aware of? Until it is repealed or we go broke, we are stuck with it. 100 year projections might be a good idea in general.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuseand incidentally:
External Link
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseExpenditures for specific wars end. Entitlements go on forever.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseFor some time now, one of the issues for some advocates of Universal healthcare has been that some people can not retire early (pre-65) because they are unable to afford health care, and Universal healthcare would solve this "problem".
Remember that Universal healthcare is not about helping the poor and downtrodden but is another middle-class entitlement to be paid for by raising taxes on corporations and the rich.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSuggestion,
Start hitting on House Republican leaders for not making a big enough deal about these things. Every time a finding like this comes out they should be making a big deal about it, in reporters faces, on live TV. Doing this may not be as important as having a bonding moment with Barak on the links, but it's still a pretty big deal to get the message out there where people can hear about it. Three messaging columns about a month ago didn't solve the problem.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseMyKu:
Looks like somebody
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abusefound another turd in the
gigantic turd bowl.