The Congressional Budget Office issued (another) grim forecast today regarding the long-term outlook of the federal budget. According to a new CBO report, U.S. public debt is set to exceed 100 percent of GDP in 2021, and reach 200 percent of GDP in 2037 if nothing is done to change its current trajectory, a significantly worse projection than was issued in last year’s CBO report.
This year alone, the CBO projects that public debt will reach 70 percent of GDP, up from 62 percent at the end of fiscal year 2010. The historical average for the U.S. is about 20 percent.
“[T]he budget outlook, for both the coming decade and beyond, is daunting,” the summary of the report states. “To keep deficits and debt from climbing to unsustainable levels, policymakers will need to increase revenues substantially as a percentage of GDP, decrease spending significantly from projected levels, or adopt some combination of those two approaches.”
In particular, the report reiterates the unsustainability of Medicare “as we know it,” predicting that mandatory federal spending on health care will nearly double over the next 24 years — from 5.4 percent of GDP today to 10.4 percent of GDP by 2035.
House Budget Committee chairman Paul Ryan (R., Wis.) said the report was further indication that the U.S. is headed toward an “ominous credit cliff,” and a glaring example of Democrats’ failure to lead. “Today the CBO reiterated what the American people know, but too many in Washington simply refuse to acknowledge: We are headed for the most predictable economic crisis in American history, and Washington is not providing the leadership we need to avoid it,” he said in a statement. “The President has yet to produce a serious budget that would prevent this crisis, and the Senate has failed to pass any budget for 784 days. This leadership deficit fails to inspire confidence and contributes to the jobs deficit millions of American families are experiencing today.”
CBO director Doug Elmendorf will testify on the numbers tomorrow at the House Budget Committee. His testimony, along with this report, should serve to increase the urgency surrounding the bipartisan deficit negotiations led by Vice President Joe Biden (as if the urgency of the situation wasn’t clear enough already). We’ll see what happens.
UPDATE: Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D., Md.), ranking member on the House Budget Committee, weighs in: “The CBO long-term budget outlook underscores the urgency and importance of getting the economy moving and putting our fiscal house in order. The question is not whether we should reduce the deficit but how,” he said in a statement. “We need a balanced plan, along the lines of what President Obama outlined in his most recent proposal, that reflects America’s priorities.”
Translation: Let’s raise taxes!
But what does the CBO report have to say about this? Well, the reports examines two different forecasts (both are significantly grim). The “extended baseline scenario” assumes, among other things, that the Bush tax rates will expire in 2013 and that the cuts to Medicare envisioned under Obamacare will actually materialize. The “alternative fiscal scenario” (i.e., the far more likely one) assumes that the Bush rates will be extended and that most Medicare spending will remain in place.
Under this second scenario, the CBO predicts “a positive effect on saving and investment from the lower marginal tax rates on capital [that] tends to increase the capital stock, output, and pretax wages compared with what they would be without the effect.”
So, let’s raise taxes?
UPDATE II: Sen. Jeff Sessions (R., Ala.), ranking member on the Senate Budget Committee, poses a fair question: Why hasn’t Kent Conrad (D., N.D.), the committee’s chair, scheduled a hearing to examine the implications of the CBO report?
“Our nation’s debt, driven by years of overspending, threatens us with a Greece-like calamity,” Sessions said in a statement. “CBO’s unnerving projections, released 784 days since the Democrat-led Senate has passed a budget, paint a sobering picture of what will occur if we do not act immediately to bring our spending under control.”
“Today’s report only further highlights the Democrats’ inexcusable refusal to pass a budget in 784 days, during which time we’ve spent more than $7 trillion. Making matters worse, Democrats haven’t scheduled a hearing to discuss this outlook—a hearing the GOP-led House Budget Committee has planned for tomorrow—another stunning decision in a time of fiscal crisis. I hope it’s a decision they will reverse.”
"But what does the CBO report have to say about this? Well, the reports examines two different forecasts (both are significantly grim). The “extended baseline scenario” assumes, among other things, that the Bush tax rates will expire in 2013 and that the cuts to Medicare envisioned under Obamacare will actually materialize. The “alternative fiscal scenario” (i.e., the far more likely one) assumes that the Bush rates will be extended and that most Medicare spending will remain in place.
Under this second scenario, the CBO predicts “a positive effect on saving and investment from the lower marginal tax rates on capital [that] tends to increase the capital stock, output, and pretax wages compared with what they would be without the effect.” "
And yet...and yet...the CBO ALSO projects that under the extended baseline scenario” the deficit will be almost entirely closed within a few years, while under the “alternative fiscal scenario” it will balloon out of control (see graphs here: External Link
). Which points out in a very roundabout way that deficit spending does indeed stimulate the economy. In the near term we can have a good economy, or we can have a balanced budget, but we can't have both. The question is, do we want to take the pain now, when we already have 9% unemployment, or do we want to try to put it off until later, when things might be a bit better (or of course, they might also be quite a bit worse - and we'll have an even bigger problem to deal with). It's fantasy, though, to pretend that reducing the deficit right now through austerity measures will fix the economy. Don't believe me? How about Bill Gross, the PIMPCO guy who everyone on NRO was citing as an oracle when he sold off US treasuries a few months ago? Turns out, he thinks balancing the budget right now would be foolish and counterproductive:
External Link
Or is he no longer a credible source, now that he disagrees with the party line?
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"the PIMPCO guy who"
Oops, that should be "PIMCO"...Freudian slip?
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"So, let’s raise taxes?"
When your very existence for being revolves around government control and government power in the hands of like minded folk there is only ONE answer to that question... yes, Yes and YES!!!
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseRE: "The Congressional Budget Office issued (another) grim forecast"
MyKu:
C.B.O. forecasts
are so grim they should include
Hansel and Gretel.
--------------
Unless it's about Obamacare, in which case it's a guaranteed money tree.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"..let's raise taxes."
EVERYBODY DIG FASTER OR WE'LL NEVER GET PAST THIS HOLE!
[THANK YOU for the return to a non-advert, simple CAPTCHA. My wife is a braincancer survivor, both of us longtime American Cancer Society volunteers, but the ACS captchas were so annoying I almost came to detest the ACS.]
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseRe: Bill Gross ("the Pimpco guy") --
He's among the best and brightest. But he's not always right. So lose the snark re: "the party line."
Even a stopped clock is correct twice a day.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseNot a single comment was made about how this effects consumer confidence. Talk Kenysian stimulus all you want. Budget projections are irrelevant when the primary stimulus is budget planning at the personal level. My largest asset is the fair market value of my home. .
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseReal estate values trumps economic recovery at the most fundamental level of reality. Not confident about the future thank you very much.