Federal prosecutors in Manhattan filed charges last week against radical Islamist Arid Uka, who confessed to killing 21-year-old Airman First Class Zachary R. Cuddeback of Virginia and 25-year-old Senior Airman Nicholas J. Alden of South Carolina outside Frankfurt’s international airport in March.
During the shooting spree, in which Uka wounded two additional servicemen, he shouted “Allahu akbar!” (Arabic for “God is great”).
The U.S. government has stayed strangely mum about whether or not it will ask German authorities to extradite Uka for prosecution on American soil. There is good historic reason to doubt that Germany will enact appropriate penalties against terrorists convicted of murdering U.S. soldiers. Even if a German court sentenced Uka to life in prison, it would likely release him well in advance.
The same day that federal prosecutors filed their charges against Uka, a Frankfurt court (yes, Frankfurt again) announced the release of Red Army Faction terrorist Birgit Hogefeld, who served only 18 years in prison for the murder of U.S. soldier Edward Pimental and the bombing of a U.S. military base that killed two more U.S. servicemen.
In 1985, Hogefeld lured Pimental away from a disco to steal his identity card, and a court later convicted her of complicity in his murder. Later, the Red Army Faction used Pimental’s credentials to gain entry to the Rhein-Main Air Base, and used explosives to kill two more people. In 2007, the German authorities released Hogefeld’s partner, Eva Haule, who helped kill Pimental, and received only 21 years in prison.
Before releasing Hogefeld, the German judicial system granted freedom to her fellow RAF terrorists Brigitte Monhaupt in 2007 and Christian Klar in 2008. Monhaupt and Klar were supposed to be incarcerated for life for the killing of West German officials and their bodyguards, as well as the attempted assassination of a U.S. Army general. Klar served a mere 26 years, and Monhaupt was set free after 24 years.
The delusional RAF terrorists — also known as the Baader-Meinhof gang — sought to abolish capitalism and crush American imperialism To this day, segments of Germany society continue to romanticize the anti-American terrorists as a kind of contemporary German version of the Bonnie and Clyde gang.
The RAF members — an outgrowth of Germany’s 1968 counter-cultural student movement — were perhaps the most telling early example of the marriage between extremist left-wing groups and the lethal anti-Semitism of the Palestinian terror movement in the 1970′s. Ulrike Meinhof, a key member of RAF, issued a statement of solidarity for the Palestinian terrorist group Black September’s killing of Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics.
The United States stations roughly 50,000 servicemen in Germany. The combination of the country’s culture of leniency and its growing radical Islamic movement does not bode well for the security of Germans or Americans. Despite German authorities’ claims that Uka was a lone gunmen, his Facebook page shows that he had clear connections to some of Germany’s most violent Islamists.
Both German and American officials have airbrushed Uka’s Islamic fundamentalism out of the picture, even though it undeniably motivated his actions, just as the U.S. military report on the deaths of 13 military personnel at Fort Hood glossed over Nidal Malik Hasan’s immersion in radical Islam. Attorney General Eric Holder has gone to lengths to avoid citing radical Islam as an inspiration for terrorism.
But ideology matters. In a piece in these pages in March, Mark Steyn wrote of the interface between Uka’s Islamic ideology and the killing of Americans. Steyn was one of the few commentators who faced up to the reality of the attack.
If the Obama administration is serious about pursuing terrorists who kill Americans — be it on U.S. soil or abroad — it should demand that Uka be tried in the United States. If history is any guide, the alternative will be a far cry from justice.
— Benjamin Weinthal is a fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.
>"only 18 years in prison ... served a mere 26 years ... was set free after 24 years."
I'm not sure where you're gong with this. We'd be lucky to have Arid Uka serve this much jail time if he was convicted here in the US.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseMaybe an attorney can answer this question...
..but, if the US would somehow be able to get their hands on this Birgit Hogefeld or her/his partner, would US prosecutors be able to prosecute this woman for these murders, even though she has already been charged, convicted and imprisoned by another sovereign? Does US law recognize foreign prosecution for the purposes of double-jeopardy?
Also, it's unfortunate that when the SOFA agreements were negotiated with Germany, there weren't provisions included that demanded that assailants against US service members would have to be unconditionally extradited to the US.
Lastly, this whole incident brings up the question about the necessity of a US footprint in Europe, or at least questions about the size of that footprint. Who benefits more from our presence in Germany - the US or Germany. I'd argue it's the later and not the former, but that's probably another conversation.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI think we all know the answer to this question.
In Obama's world, America is no more or less important than any other country; therefore American lives are no more or less important than the lives of the citizens of any other country; so there's no reason not to allow Uka to be tried in Germany, much as would be the case for someone who picked the pocket of an America on holiday, or who stole an American's traveler's checks. Six of one, half a dozen of the other.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse>"there's no reason not to allow Uka to be tried in Germany"
If you think there is a reason, why don't you present it?
If an American citizen murders a German tourist visiting America, we don't extradite that American to Germany to face charges there. We prosecute him here in America for breaking American laws, and then punish him with American punishment.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"If an American citizen murders a German tourist visiting America, we don't extradite that American to Germany to face charges there."
That's true, we don't. But, that German civilian visiting America who meets an untimely demise, was not in America providing a service to the American people. This is very much not the case with our uniformed service personnel that are stationed in Germany.
While one can argue to what degree we're providing a blanket of protection for Germany against Russian aggression, I don't think anyone can reasonably argue that we aren't providing at least some protection for Germany.
If we're going to provide protection for the German people, I don't think it's beyond the pale to request certain considerations from Germany when our service men & women are attacked on their soil. As I said in another post, it's too bad this wasn't addressed in the SOFA agreements.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseCome off it. American service personnel in Germany are not providing a service to the German people. Arguably they are not even providing a service to the American people.
The US government wants to have US military forces stationed in Germany more than the German government wants to have them stationed there. That leaves the US government in a weak negotiating posture.
>"I don't think anyone can reasonably argue that we aren't providing at least some protection for Germany."
To whatever extent we are, we should not be doing so.
>"I don't think it's beyond the pale to request certain considerations from Germany when our service men & women are attacked on their soil."
Based on the data provided in this post, those who murder American soldiers in Germany receive a significantly stiffer sentence than does the average murderer in the US.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse>If you think there is a reason, why don't you present it?<
Simple - its an act of war in a current and ongoing conflict against a military target, not merely run of the mill street crime directed against run of the mill civilians.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseOk. So what is the correct punishment for acts of war? An I to understand that it is greater than the punishment for acts of murder committed outside of war? Where does one look this up?
It strikes me that if anything, "acts of war committed against military targets" should be punished LESS severely than so-called "run of the mill street crime directed against run of the mill civilians".
But then, I have this old-fashioned classical-liberal and republican idea that the lives of agents of the state are not worth more than those of "run of the mill civilians".
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseScott Wilson-- I suspect that on the most basic level, we get more out of it now (as opposed to pre-1989) because it gives us a base for our other actions.
But then you get into the question of who benefits from us being active in parts of the world closer to Germany than us. As Libya demonstrates, Germany and all of NATO mainly have a policy of "let's you and him fight," and if we stopped doing that, it would be a very different world with very different needs for us in Europe.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"The U.S. government has stayed strangely mum about whether or not it will ask German authorities to extradite Uka for prosecution on American soil."
Seriously? Given what we've seen from the Obama administration, this is strange? Calling it strange reminds me of Reuters and AP economic reports that say "unexpectedly".
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe Obama Administration is only serious about one thing: The Obama Administration.
PS...Though I'm sure Obama is actually looking forward to the day when his presidency ends, as that will be the day he will really cash-in and become a very wealthy liberal who calls for taxes to be raised on the hard-working dupes who are not smart enough to shelter their earnings. And unlike Obama, not 'smart enough' to get rich w/out actually producing a good or service that must succeed on merit, not connections.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse