White House debt talks ended without a deal Thursday, as negotiators resolved not to meet again on Friday. Instead, President Obama will hold a press conference at 11 a.m., presumably to “take it to the American people” as he warned House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R., Va.) he would do if Cantor “called his bluff.” Meanwhile, House Republicans and Democrats will hold conference meetings tomorrow morning to assess the state of the negotiations. Upon returning to the Capitol on Thursday, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) said the meeting went well and that congressional leaders will continue to “discuss the way forward” and “see what happens.”
This clown really thinks he is Reagan. To call back to an earlier topic, he is the anti-Reagan.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseYes, that's what this situation needs, another speech from Obama.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseHey, it always helps to put another oar in the water. Give the man some credit for helping the GOP out. If he were to keep quiet, his poll numbers and support would go up.
The GOP couldn't have asked for much more, short of televising Obama's suggested Camp David "summit" on TV.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAnd More Cowbell!!
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseFinally! It's been way too long since his last press conference.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseToday Obama told the clogged toilet in the oval office that if it did not unclog itself he would give a speech.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe thing of it is that the MSM are reporting this as if our valiant president is doing what he can to make the Republicans see reason. Not only are they deceiving/persuading those Americans who give scant attention to politics, they are also feeding into his delusions.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbusePredictions:
We'll see Obama at his nastiest tomorrow, revealing major cracks in that vaunted, Spock-like cool demeanor.
We'll see Obama with zero insight into how petulant and childish he sounds.
We'll see Obama pass the limit on blame projection, beginning a backlash movement among the till-now sycophantic media.
We'll get at least three 5-second sound bites worthy of pro-GOP campaign ads for 2012.
We'll see post-conference polling that shows Obama losing support in the debt-ceiling psychodrama.
We'll rejoice and turn circles holding hands and singing Kumbayah, milord while chomping sugary doughnuts and swilling tea.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseHe will be funny and pleasant tomorrow because he already knows Republican leaders are caving minute by minute. Obama wins again.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseHeh. You might consider dropping the "City."
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWe will plan on breaking out the sugary doughnuts and tea at nr HQ!
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseDon't forget, we would like to see some "planking" by the NR contributors and staff. The extra burst of sugary goodness should help.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI was going to write a comment about Obama's presser, then I saw the captcha:
"Mumbo Jumbo"
Hey, that'll do.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI so look forward to the oratorical wizardry that I fear I might not sleep tonight.
Seriously, though, someone should count the strawmen ...
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI hope some folks in the press ask him "math questions." Seems to me nobody has a plan to balance the budget yet, not even close. How can anyone's plan be "too extreme" if it leaves us running $1.0 trillion deficits (that's better than $1.6 trillion deficits, but doesn't solve the problem, now does it?)
For that matter, ask him when he thinks we'll see congress pass a budget again, too! (Isn't that really the underlying issue anyway?)
Also ask him "where do you think the money is going to come from?" I'd like to hear his clueless explanation for the economic shortfall (corporate jet owners again?) The more he has to explain his economic plans, the worse off he'll be.
PS - sounds to me like yesterday's presidential huff was a staged set up for his planned withdrawal from negotiations. Which is fine, his speeches only work on the koolaid drinkers anyway, and he wasn't negotiating in good faith.
Focus on CONGRESSIONAL negotiations, leave Obama out of it and dare the president to veto a congressional compromise. Obama's strategic needs are not exactly the same as congressfolk's. Drive a wedge between Obama and Dems who don't want to get wiped out like in 2010.
The main goal of a compromise at this point should be to "politically help congress and hurt the president." I think it's pretty clear that nothing serious will happen about deficits until Obama is out of office. So Republicans really need to keep their focus on doing that.
PPS - Gallup and Rasmussen both show Obama falling "out of the margin of error" behind a generic Republican today. "Richard" seems like he is about to crack.
PPPS - if negotiations collapse, there is a good TV ad to be made comparing this situation to the collapse of negotiations over Palestine, and the president's terrible approval ratings all over the middle east. Message: this guy screws up every negotiation he gets involved in. No leadership.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseMore Cowbell! YES!
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseLet's hope his teleprompter isn't working.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI'm amazed Barack is trying to negotiate these matters himself, in a face to face manner.
This is a non-Presidential approach. I do not recall anything like this being done in modern times.
I am stunned he is attempting it and that his "advisors" are allowing it.
Credit Cantor for spurring this when he and Kyl walked out a few weeks ago on Biden and said the thing wasn't going anywhere until Barack got involved. And Barack took the bait.
LOL ...
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI think he's trying to set himself up as the "hero" when the McConnell/Reid/Pelosi extravaganza is passed. "Look at me--we were headed toward a civilization-crushing default...but I stepped in and led the warring parties to a compromise."
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseYou know that's coming.
Obama redefines meaning of overexposure.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse