Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Corner

The one and only.

Print   |  Text
 

Senate Blocks Vote on ‘Cut, Cap, and Balance’

The Senate voted today to block the House-passed “Cut, Cap and Balance” legislation from even being brought to a vote on passage. A procedural motion to “table” a “motion to proceed” on the measure passed 51 to 46 on party lines.

Reps. Tim Huelskamp (R., Kan.) and Jeff Duncan (R., S.C.) led a delegation of roughly a dozen House Republican freshman to the Senate floor to observe the proceedings during the vote.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D., Nev.) said Thursday it would be a “waste of the Senate’s time” to debate the measure any further, adding that he thought the bill was “perhaps some of the worst legislation in the history of this country.” Reid had initially schedule the vote for Saturday, but decided to move it up at the last minute.

“Senator Reid’s scramble to vote on this bill a day earlier than previously announced shows that Cut, Cap, and Balance is quickly gaining momentum,” said Rep. Jim Jordan (R., Ohio), chairman of the Republican Study Committee, which was largely responsible for drafting the legislation. “Senate Democrats should stop hiding behind a procedural vote to block a plan with two-to-one support from the American public. So long as it has the support of the American people, Cut, Cap, and Balance remains very much alive.”

At a press conference moments before the Senate vote, House Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio) and other House GOP leaders said if the Senate didn’t like “Cut, Cap, and Balance” as written, they should amend it and send it back. “Senate Democrats have defied the will of the American people who overwhelmingly support real spending cuts, caps on future spending, and a balanced budget to create a better environment for private-sector job growth,” Boehner said. “To help avoid a default, I urge the Senate to rethink their decision and immediately approve the responsible, balanced, House-passed ‘Cut, Cap, & Balance’ proposal.”

“The Senate and the president are in meltdown,” Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R., Utah) told reporters. “They have not figured out what they’re going to do. They have no plan, they haven’t put anything on a piece of paper. And the clock is ticking.”

UPDATE: Shortly after the Senate voted to kill “Cut, Cap and Balance,” Harry Reid announced that the he would not, as previously planned, keep the Senate in session over the weekend, citing the apparent progress in negotiations between President Obama and John Boehner.

Reid also suggested that the contingency plan he and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) had been discussing was no longer necessary because of these developments. “It looked earlier this week like the Senate would have to originate the legislation perhaps as soon as today to avoid default,” he said. “During the course of the week, circumstances have changed. The Speaker of the House and the President have been working to reach agreement on a major deficit-reduction measure. I wish them both very well.”

Because the package under discussion includes tax increases as well as spending cuts, Reid claimed, and due to the Constitutional requirement that all revenue bills originate in the lower chamber, “the path to avert default now runs first to the House of Representatives…We in the Senate must wait for them.”

Reid said he expects “all kinds of meetings going on” over the weekend, barely able to contain his bitterness for being left out of the negotiations.

UPDATE II: Sen. Jim DeMint (R., S.C.) vows to continue the fight and force another vote on “Cut, Cap and Balance”:

The bipartisan House-passed Cut, Cap, Balance bill remains the only plan on the table, the only one that preserves our AAA rating, and is only four Democrat votes away from a Senate majority to end this debt crisis,” said Senator DeMint. “I will work to force another vote on Cut, Cap & Balance next week because the President and Democrats have not offered the American people any other viable solution.   

It is outrageous that every Senate Democrat voted against even allowing a debate on balancing the budget within 10 years, a plan supported by two-thirds of Americans with wide support across all party lines. Why are Senate Democrats so afraid to debate a balanced budget? Cut, Cap, Balance is the compromise plan that passed the House and can end the wasteful spending that caused this debt crisis. It gives the President the debt limit increase he has asked for in return for immediate spending cuts, enforceable spending caps, and a constitutional amendment to force Washington to stop spending more than it brings in.   

“The President and Democrats have been beyond reckless in this debate, refusing to offer any serious solution to our fiscal crisis. The only plan the President has offered would increase our debt by $10 trillion and push our nation into bankruptcy.   

I urge Republican leaders to stop letting the President to drag you back like children into secret meetings where he pretends to do something constructive. The President created this crisis by irresponsible spending and borrowing that has left our economy in shambles, and if he’s unwilling to simply agree to balance the budget in 10 years then he is not a credible negotiating partner.   

No more closed door meetings, no more phony compromises that don’t solve the problem, no more useless commissions. We have a balanced approach supported by a bipartisan House majority that ends our debt crisis if just four Senate Democrats would keep their promise and support a balanced budget.   

We must pass Cut, Cap & Balance to keep our nation from falling off a fiscal cliff.

UPDATE III: Speaker Boehner delivered a rare speech on the House floor in response to the Senate’s actions. His remarks:

Mr. Speaker, there is a huge gulf between Washington, D.C. and the American people. They are dealing with tough times.  They’re struggling to pay their bills. And they look to Washington, they see politicians who can’t stop spending money – their money. 

Listen, we’re broke. We need to stop the out-of-control spending spree that’s going on in Washington, D.C. 

The House has acted.  We passed a bill that raised the debt limit, cuts spending, puts in place real reforms in place, and requires Congress send to the states a Balanced Budget Amendment.  It’s called ‘cut, cap, and balance.’ 

We’ve done our job. The Democrats who run Washington have done nothing. They can’t stop spending the American people’s money.  They won’t and they refuse. 

The Senate Majority Leader says they still won’t offer a plan to cut spending.  Or a plan to raise the debt limit. Frankly, that’s irresponsible. 

Mr. Speaker, where is their plan? “President Obama talks about being ‘the adult in the room.’ But where is his plan to cut spending and raise the debt limit? 

We’re in the fourth quarter – and we’re fighting for jobs, we’re fighting for the future, we’re fighting for the American people.

New on The Corner. . .


COMMENTS   53

EXPAND  

   07/22/11 12:10

The following should happen; unfortunately, it won't.

Tea-Partiers and citizens who understand the predicament we are in light up the phone-lines on Capital Hill (and on talk-shows) and descend en masse on DC. Reid wilts under the pressure and allows a vote on 'Cut, Cap and Balance' and vulnerable Senate Dems. have a 'change of heart'. Obama then either signs the bill or signs his electoral death-warrant by vetoing the bill.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Manbearpig5
   07/22/11 12:10

Hang this vote around the necks of the liberals:

1. Senate Democrats have refused to submit a budget for 2 years.
2. Senate Democrats have prevented a vote on a bill that would resolve the debt ceiling issue
3. Democrats want the ability to spend 2.5 trillion more (ceiling increase) without accounting for it in a budget.
4. Declare democrats unserious about any fiscal sanity, pass 500B increase in debt ceiling along with 500B in tax cuts and go on vacation.

GIVE THEM NOTHING

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
larrytex56
   07/22/11 13:44

I would tweak your proposal to be $500 billion debt limit increase and $750 billion in spending cuts. $1.50 in cuts for every $1 debt limit increase. That way, Republicans should up the ante. Then, give them nothing.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
HOVDummy
   07/22/11 12:13

"perhaps some of the worst legislation in the history of this country.” Sounds like Obamacare which was allowed to be voted on in the Senate. Once again, thank you union mmebers, illegals and Steve Wynn for re-electing Harry Reid.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/22/11 12:15

The GOP should take their ball and go home and wait there until Reid et. al agree to bring Cut, Cap & Balance to the Senate floor for a vote.

If the Democrats aren't going to negotiate and legislate in good faith, then how can they expect any different from the Republicans. We're approaching 1K days since the passage of our last annual budget, and it's been at least that long since the Senate - under the control of the Dems - has passed a budget. If there's a failure of leadership, it's coming from Reid & Obama.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/22/11 12:25

I agree, Scott. Boehner needs to tell Obama that negotiations are based on CC&B, nothing else.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/22/11 12:31

I would tweak that only to say that as soon as the senate dems put ANYTHING on paper, negotiations should resume.

If they'll refuse to vote on CCB, FINE. "Then DRAFT something YOU like." It's hardly a disagreement, just a variation on your theme. I'd resume talks as soon as the dems actually put a proposal on paper.

In practicality, Scott, that minor tweak would actually forestall negotiations even longer, since Chuck Schumer stated over a year ago the Senate has no intention of drafting anything for people to review.

The whole skit they are busy enacting was supposed to be a re-run of the 95-96 melodrama. Someone forgot to inform them that Bubba is indispensable to that script, and well, ELVIS left the building early in 2001.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
 NK
   07/22/11 12:21

Scott Wilson--disagree with you. What I think will happen is next week, the House will pass $500B debt increase, w/$600 spending cuts over 5 years-- real cuts. The Senate will then PASS that bill-- The POTUS will veto. Clintonian Triangulation in reverse, the Repub House and 'Moderate" Senate Dems against the Obamaniac. Pass the popcorn.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/22/11 12:31

What makes you think the House will pass such a thing? Has Boehner given any indications he will initiatie it? I'd love it to happen.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/22/11 12:24

So, the United States Senate, under the leadership of Harry Reid and Chuck Schumer, now stands thoroughly derelict for well over 800 days on its most basic obligation under law -- to pass a budget.

The only thing they've produced are charts and a slide show.

And the President, a late-comer to the negotiations surrounding his own personal request for an increase to the debt limit of a nation awash in $14,000,000,000,000.00 of amassed red ink, put forth a plan that only received ZERO votes from his party's Senate members, and which would DOUBLE the nation's debt in 10 years.

An improvement of sorts, since he's increased in 2 years by 43% our debt that took over 220 years to accumulate, but still woeful.

And the only plans on paper to credibly deal in ANY WAY with the nation's debt load have been produced by the UPPER HOUSE -- the House of Representatives. And Reid states the ball is in THEIR court?

Would it were that Reid could "dribble", so the tribunal that could hardly stoop any lower could finally draft an actual piece of legislation.

No offense to Kent Conrad, the North Dakota millionaire protector of poor people everywhere, but his slide show wasn't all that entertaining. He should stick to producing actual budgets, instead of theater.

This is all proceeding so inherently differently from 1995-96, that it makes less sense as the clock ticks for the GOP to cave to these demagogues who refuse to do their most basic of jobs.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/22/11 12:33

"Reid said he expects “all kinds of meetings going on” over the weekend, barely able to contain his bitterness for being left out of the negotiations."

Seriously? He doesn't have a proposal to negotiate, yet he's the roadblock to anything that has been proposed and even passed in the House.

Reid is horrible on so many levels.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/22/11 12:45

"Reid is horrible on so many levels."

I hate to beat a dead horse, but the selection of Sharon Angle to challenge Reid continues to bite the GOP on the behind. Reid was the proverbial fish in the barrel, and Angle still couldn't pull it off because she was a HORRIBLE campaigner. To beat an incumbent, especially one that is the sitting Majority leader, you need to be a competent campaigner, no matter how strong the wind is at your sails. Angle wasn't.

Had the GOP fielded better candidates in DE, CO, WA and perhaps even AK & NY, the tenor of this entire debate would be entirely different. When you have a deliberative body with only 100-members that controls half the legislative process, every vote really does matter.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/22/11 13:05

Really, you blame Harry Reid on Sharron Angle? Even in one's worst scenario, she could NOT be worse than this pathetic, scrawny, doubledealing, scumsucking, backstabbing, Uriah Heepish, rat Reid.

Blame the unions and the casinos for this situation. They are the ones who turned the tide back to Reid. Someone up above said blame Steve Wynn. That is absolutely correct. If the casinos would have supported Angle or at the least stayed out of it, there would be no more Senatewh%re Harry Reid. And the country would be so much better off.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
 JPK
   07/22/11 13:11

I blame Michael Corleone. Nevada was never the same after he off'd Moe Greene.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/22/11 13:17

"Really, you blame Harry Reid on Sharron Angle?"

No. I blame "Harry Reid" on the Republican primary voters that selected a candidate as horrific as Sharon Angle. She wasn't a bad candidate, she was an embarrassingly bad candidate.

There's a lesson in the Harry Reid disaster from 2008: No matter how compromised the incumbent is, and no matter how much the political landscape is working against the incumbent, you need to have a credible, competent alternative to beat that incumbent. Angle wasn't it.

"Blame the unions and the casinos for this situation"

Wait, are you saying that organized labor worked (in an organized way) against the Republican candidate? I'm shocked, shocked I tell you. Next, you're going to say that there's gambling and Vegas.

Organized labor worked tirelessly to stop Scott Walker and Justice Prosser. They failed. Why? Because neither Walker nor Prosser were idiots.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
larrytex56
   07/22/11 13:40

Scott, you forget that the casino owners had as much to do with Harry Reid getting elected as the unions. If Steve Wynn and his cronies in the business had stayed out, instead of doing things like busing employees to vote and openly giving Reid money and seeing Reid as their "inside ticket" in Washington rather than the mortal threat that he really is, it would have made it easier.

While I don't think Nevada Republicans made the best choice, Reid money, casino money, and union money certainly hurt Sue Lowden by televising misleading ads and attacks that people should have seen through.

I'm not going to blame this on GOP primary voters alone. Steve Wynn has a lot to answer for to the people of Nevada and the United States.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/22/11 14:07

"this pathetic, scrawny, doubledealing, scumsucking, backstabbing, Uriah Heepish, rat Reid"

Nicely put.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/22/11 14:18

The guy's stance at the podium is always the same: mincing and mush-mouth. Perhaps he is a cut out figure and the rest of the Senate has not figured out how one-dimensional he is.

I think Nevada (Wynn and others) must have buyer's remorse.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/22/11 13:14

Scott, I think the inescapable reality was Angle had foot in mouth, and a lot "out there" statements that would've sank her regardless how competent a campaigner she was.

And that illegal immigrant ad in the closing weeks may very well have singlehandedly doomed her! There is a way to appeal to the anti-illegal crowd, but that was about as subtle as a hammer to the head!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/22/11 13:15

Scott, I think the inescapable reality was Angle had foot in mouth, and a lot "out there" statements that would've sank her regardless how competent a campaigner she was.

And that illegal immigrant ad in the closing weeks may very well have singlehandedly doomed her! There is a way to appeal to the anti-illegal crowd, but that was about as subtle as a hammer to the head!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Load More Comments

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact