Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Corner

The one and only.

Print   |  Text
 

Boehner Plan Gains Momentum

House Republicans are rallying behind House Speaker John Boehner’s (R., Ohio) deficit reduction plan, believing that is it their best available option to raise the debt ceiling and cut spending. During a Wednesday morning conference meeting, Boehner told members to “get your ass in line” and support his plan. “This is the bill,” he said. “I can’t do this job unless you’re behind me.” If the bill passes the House, the speaker predicted, Senate Democrats and President Obama would “fold like a cheap suit.”

Notably, Rep. Jim Jordan (R., Ohio), chairman of the Republican Study Committee, opened the meeting by apologizing for a series of e-mails sent by an RSC staffer urging outside groups like Club for Growth and Heritage Action to pressure undecided members to oppose the plan. Rank-and-file members, many of them members of the RSC, were none too pleased to find themselves on the list of targets. There were several calls for the offending staffer to be fired. Much of the meeting was devoted to the controversy, which merely underscores the intra-party tension that has been simmering over the past several weeks.

Meanwhile, however, the opposition bloc led by Jordan appears to be crumbling, as leadership’s message seems to be sinking in. Sources tells NRO that a number of members who were confirmed no votes against the Boehner plan announced during the meeting that they would be voting yes. One of those members, Rep. Blake Farenthold (R., Texas) told reporters that while he would like to “snap my fingers and change the world like ‘I Dream of Genie’ of Samantha on ‘Bewitched,’” Republicans “need to take what we can get.”

A number of other members echoed this sentiment. “It’s not perfect, but it’s a lot better than what we’d have had if we’d just let Senate Democrats and this president continue to spend more,” said freshman Rep. Michael Grimm (R., N.Y.), who plan to vote yes. “You have to accept your own limitations. I can’t impose my will on the Senate or the President.”

Rep. Steve LaTourette (R., Ohio) said members were starting to realize that they now had an opportunity to “establish the principle that the debt limit should not be treated as a routine thing but as an opportunity to get the debt under control.” Boehner’s plan, he said, “is the only vehicle available to do that.”

Even Rep. Mike Pence (R., Ind.), a prominent conservative with a history of voting against leadership, said he was undecided, but seemed to indicate that he could ultimately support the plan, calling it “an important first step toward fiscal discipline and reform.”

Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R., Va.) said the decision would come down to whether members would support this plan or the alternative, which is default. Rep. Reid Ribble (R., Wis.), a freshman on the House Budget Committee, said members recognized the need to present a united front in the debate to maximize their leverage. “We recognize that time is running out, that we need to stand together and stand for something,” Ribble told NRO. “This may be the compromise position that we have to take to get something done.”

“The president said he’s going to veto it, so we know that he doesn’t like it that much,” he added. “So do we want to stand with the president, or do we stand with the Speaker of the House? If those are my two choices right now, I’m going to stand with the Speaker of the House.”

Rep. Jeff Flake (R., Ariz.), a confirmed ‘no’, acknowledged that the plan is “gaining support” in the caucus. “Whether or not it’s enough I don’t know,” he added. “This could be the last train leaving the station.”

House GOP leadership staff are busily working to adjust the details of the plan after Tuesday’s scoring from the Congressional Budget Office came in below target. Sources say this has actually played to leadership’s advantage because they’ll now be able to sell a much stronger plan to their members and attract more votes.

Members will be presented with an updated draft of the plan later this afternoon, with a vote tentatively scheduled for Thursday. GOP aides won’t predict whether or not they have the votes to pass the plan, but acknowledge things are moving in the right direction. Rep. Paul Ryan (R., Wis.), however, said he thought the plan would pass. Tea-party favorite Allen West (R., Fla.), who supports the plan, said he might be willing to bet his retirement check on it. For many House Republicans, the Boehner plan is the only viable way forward. “We have to [get the votes],” said Rep. Patrick McHenry (R., N.C.). “I don’t think there’s a choice.”

New on The Corner. . .


COMMENTS   106

EXPAND  

   07/27/11 13:24

"If the bill passes the House, the speaker predicted, Senate Democrats and President Obama would “fold like a cheap suit.”"

Ridiculous boasting by Boehner. And it'll likely come back to haunt all of us.

What is the plan, if the Dems do as they say, gut the Boehner bill and replace it with the Reid bill and send it back?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/27/11 13:28

"What is the plan, if the Dems do as they say, gut the Boehner bill and replace it with the Reid bill and send it back?"

Default.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/27/11 13:30

That's not a plan. That is a disaster, that will hurt the entire country - and destroy the GOP's chances in next year's election, at which point you can forget repealing Obamacare or shutting down FinReg.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/27/11 13:34

if that's not the alternate plan then we might as well pass the Reid bill pronto.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/27/11 13:45

liberal sock puppet ...

why is it you always take what Reid or Obama says as if they already occured and are facts ?

Reid may want to gut it but all he can really do is try and amend it to death ... he may not have the votes to do even that ...

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/27/11 13:50

Actually, the "disaster" has been multiple years of ~$1.6T deficits with no end in sight and a President entirely unconcerned about it, as evidenced by his complete joke of a budget proposal.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/27/11 13:52

Actually, that's not a disaster at all compared to the costs of defaulting on the debt, or cutting large amounts of spending elsewhere to keep from doing so. Doing so will exacerbate every problem we have, it will save nothing and it will cost the GOP dearly.

Political posturing and silly statements won't get us out of the hole that we've dug for ourselves on this issue.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/27/11 14:12

Do you realize that (in 2010) our annual debt service was "only" $413B?

External Link 

Now, that certainly is a tremendous amount of money, but it only represents just under 11% of our current fiscal-year projected expenses. Of course, I have to use the projected outlays because there is no actual fiscal budget and hasn't been for over two-years. Whose fault is that? But, I digress.

If we can't, against the backdrop of nearly $4T in annual expenses figure out a way to pay a measly $413B, then we had better hang it up.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/27/11 13:43

Ridiculous boasting? A justified slap back at Obama after Boehner went in good faith more than once to the WH, only to learn that BHO's only interest was in setting him up to take the fall, not do anything serious about the state of the nation's finances. Then topped it off by treating him like a truant 4th-grader ("be in my office at 11:00").

I'm glad Boehner isn't showing Obama any respect. Doesn't deserve any.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/27/11 13:31

if that's not the alternate plan then we might as well pass Reid bill pronto.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/27/11 13:33

Boehner is the modern George B. McClellan. "...He chronically overestimated the strength of enemy units and was reluctant to apply principles of mass, frequently leaving large portions of his army unengaged at decisive points...."

Hopefully he will be replaced soon.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
JM
   07/27/11 13:56

Get a clue. Half of this country voted for a socialist president and a partially socialist Congress. What would you chest-thumping experts do in Boehner's shoes? Not raise the limit? That would guarantee Obama's re-election. Is that what you geniuses want?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Windy City Commentary
   07/27/11 14:18

Explain in at least one paragraph how not raising the debt limit would guaratee that Obama will be re-elected. Let's see if you can explain it, instead of repeating talking points to badger conservatives with.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/27/11 15:01

Well, since none of us really know what the heck happened in the House, or what is really going on...

My best guess, to answer your question, is that not giving Obama the amount he asks for (2.4 trillion blank check/debt ceiling) he will have to address this again. He and his staff have admitted that they want this amount to carry him to 2013 so they won't have to have a debt ceiling discussion again. Sorry, two paragraphs.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
JM
   07/27/11 15:26

Here's your paragraph:

The debt ceiling is not raised. The government lacks liquidity to pay 100% of current outlays. The Executive Branch therefore controls who gets paid and who does not. Obama exploits this power and withholds payment from "seniors" "children" and "working families." The courtier media lap it up and pound away at heartlessness of conservatives. Inarticulate, media-unsavvy Republicans prove incapable of penetrating media blitz. (Cf., Gingrigh v. Clinton, 1995.) Republicans cave. Obama hailed as "comeback kid" -- akin to Bill Clinton -- as he squeaks out a 2012 victory and wins a second term.

There's your paragraph.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
TheRealGrant
   07/27/11 15:29

Not raising the debt ceiling where Obama doesn't have to veto an increase causes the following:

1. Immediately and significant economic harm because unemployment checks would soon stop, over one million federal workers (and a similar if not larger number of contractors) would not get paid, student loans and grants would end, FHA loans would end (another hit to housing, yay!) and lots of services that assist business would stop or be significantly slowed down - e.g. customs inspections of goods coming into this country or of people who are coming in from the country, because you have to furlough the customs officers.

2. The likely downgrade (which may happen in either case) would increase in likelyhood when this economic harm occurred (loss of tax receipts) so that spending would have to be cut even more to avoid default (and remember that social security is going to get paid via the trust fund debts).

3. The next election then becomes not about Obama's record, but about why Republicans are so reckless and irresponsible that they started a double dip recession, if not depression.

4. Due to that, not only Obama would more than likely get another 4 years, but we'd be talking about Speaker Pelosi, too. But you could pat yourself on the back for standing up for principle like that idiot Mark Levin told you to.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/27/11 15:03

Oh I don't know, how about a plan he can articulate and defend when he publicizes it. Not oh yea, well the numbers aren't correct, so we have to go and figure it out so it actually cuts something. No wait, it doesn't actually cut anything meaningful, but we need you to stay on board and vote for it because we are republicans and we need to stay focused on getting this through the house. This is like the CR vote earlier in the year, just pass it, it doesn't have any cuts in it, but we need to move on, and anyway we'll have another bite at the apple when the debt ceiling needs to be raised. Boehner was in congress when all the spending occurred under Bush and now he is the leader because he has played the game to become the speaker. Heck, he wouldn't be there except for the tea party. He needs to resign the speaker's post and move out of the way. Let someone who can speak for meaningful, honest cuts to current spending levels, not some pie in the sky future reductions in increases of all the government dung he's voted for in the past. How's that JM?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
JM
   07/27/11 15:45

So you want Boehner to push "meaningful, honest cuts"? But wait -- weren't "meaningful, honest cuts" included in the Ryan plan? And didn't that pass the House? Yes! So we surely have nothing to worry about! Because, as we know, if a bill passes the House, it automatically becomes the law of the land. Sarcasm aside, Boehner can't get all that he (and we) want because Democrats control the White House and the Senate. And Democrats got elected because a big chunk of this country likes statism, socialism, nannyism -- whatever you want to call it. Those are the facts.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/27/11 16:05

"..Boehner can't get all that he (and we) want because Democrats control the White House and the Senate.."

Well, how about Boehner getting anything he (we) want. His cuts are scratches. They won't be recognizable in two weeks. Just like the CR vote. What does this plan cut next year from this years spending levels? This plan will result in anarchy by the tea party and you can kiss goodbye the republicans who fall in line. Another nail in the coffin of the big government republican party.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/27/11 16:08

"..Boehner can't get all that he (and we) want because Democrats control the White House and the Senate.."

Well, how about Boehner getting anything he (we) want. His cuts are scratches. They won't be recognizable in two weeks. Just like the CR vote. What does this plan cut next year from this years spending levels? This plan will result in anarchy by the tea party and you can kiss goodbye the republicans who fall in line. Another nail in the coffin of the republican party.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Load More Comments

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact