Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Corner

The one and only.

Print   |  Text
 

Take a Break

 . . . and if you happen to be in a city where the new movie The Guard, which opened today in NYC, is playing, go and see it.

I should begin by saying that I have an unusual skill, one I’ve never heard anyone else boast of: Just from watching a trailer and reading a couple of reviews, I can predict with uncanny accuracy whether I will like a particular movie. (Really: Some 97 percent of the time, I guess right.) The result is, I see a lot fewer movies I don’t enjoy than just about anyone else I know. But once every few weeks, I want to go to the movies just for the hell of it, with no hope whatever for the particular movie. That’s what I did today with The Guard — and I feel like someone who drunkenly emptied out his wallet on the roulette wheel,  slurred out “Black 17” at random, and started to lope away distractedly, only to be called back: “Monsieur! Monsieur! Ze black seventeen!”

You see, The Guard looks like 1) a sentimental Irish-produced comedy about a small country town and 2) a fish-out-of-water, odd-couple, cop-buddy comedy — in other words, it belongs to not just one but two genres that looked like they had pretty much exhausted their possibilities many, many years ago. But this one is absolutely sparkling and fresh: There are laugh-out-loud moments from start to finish, so it works as a comedy; and the emotional stuff is grounded in realistic sentiment (as opposed to paint-by-numbers, transparent screenwriterly manipulation), so it also manages to draw a couple of surprisingly welcome tears.

The star is Brendan Gleeson, as a foul-mouthed roué of an Irish-small-town cop; American actor Don Cheadle plays an FBI agent who comes to Ireland in hot pursuit of a drug gang moving half a billion dollars’ worth of cocaine. The film’s plot works tightly, but is not especially important to its success: Go to this one for the laughs, and to have a good time in the company of likeable, terrifically well-written characters (especially Gleeson, but also Cheadle and even a couple of the villains).

I recommend this movie fervently, without any reservation, except the following: The lovable main character uses drugs, has sex with prostitutes, expresses a number of bigoted sentiments, and has a vocabulary in which roughly one out of every ten words is a four-letter one. So if you yourself are made uncomfortable by that sort of thing, or don’t want to expose your kids to it, please skip this movie. But I would stress that the roughness of Gleeson’s character serves to underscore his basic decency: He has flaws, but he is a good man who is capable of doing the right thing on important matters. I’m glad to have spent an hour and a half in his company.

New on The Corner. . .


COMMENTS   17

EXPAND  

jas828282
   07/29/11 23:14

Thanks for the recommendation, Mike. I actually consider myself to have that ability of which you speak also (though maybe at the 95% level, rather than your lofty 97%!) So, I will go and see this movie first chance I get.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/29/11 23:29

In brief Brendan Gleeson plays some sort of External Link  a stock-character or literary-device which I think has an inherent bias.

Based on the trailer and your description I guess the film has strong similarities to External Link 

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/29/11 23:49

"I recommend this movie fervently, without any reservation, except the following: The lovable main character uses drugs, has sex with prostitutes, expresses a number of bigoted sentiments, and has a vocabulary in which roughly one out of every ten words is a four-letter one"

If you replace "except" with "especially because of", the review makes much more sense. This does look to be a definite on my short list, not the least of which has to do with Mr. Gleeson's participation. He's one of "the bunch" that seems perfectly comfortable in indies and blockbusters alike (with both usually being quality endeavors). I noticed that the director, John Michael McDonagh, is the brother of "In Bruges" director Martin McDonagh. That's almost reason in itself to see this since "Bruges" was one of the better debuts I've yet witnessed (with Gleeson and Co. having much to do with it). Unfortunately, I might have to wait a little while on "Guard's" viewing since I don't currently reside on either coast (and my city no longer boasts an Angelika; it closed after 13 years of service). Oh well. Such is life in only a somewhat big city.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Zachary Foreman
   07/30/11 00:11

It could be that your system is to exclusive. It may be true that 97% of the movies that you end up watching you enjoy, but you cannot, of course, know how many movies you exclude you would have enjoyed. This is a case in point, perhaps. Of course, this may be what you want, since false positives (watching bad movies) might be more painful than false negatives (missing good movies).

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
CaesarTheSalad
   07/30/11 00:59

Since it's 1:00 a.m. and I'm feeling picky, I'll point you that you have absolutely no way of knowing if you would have liked the movies you skipped based on their trailers, since you didn't see them. Your argument is invalid.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/30/11 01:48

When we "recommend fervently" should not there be no exceptions or reservations? With the things that you described, it sounds like a generally bad movie with a few good (maybe not even good, just funny) things in it.

Mr. Potemra, you are the one who usually rights about the spiritual side of life on NR. Are you practicing what you're preaching? "Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world . . . " When our choice of entertainment does not coincide with our values, before long our values with coincide with our choice of entertainment.

Step up my friend. We live in a world full of people full of ideals. The problem is most people don't live up their own ideals. Do you really think God would approve of or want you to be watching movies with sex scenes, drug use and abundant cursing? Then be in church on Sunday as if everything is fine? Is that not, in part, what has led to the condition we currently find our society in today?

Don't just write about it, live it.

Blessings.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/30/11 03:11

This guy is always forever looking for somebody to forgive. If he forgave the very real priest that groped some dude at the beach, why not some character in a movie? It's ALL GOOD. :)

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/30/11 11:50

>>Amen, my friend, Matt.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
MkeN
   07/30/11 09:41

Rules for trailers, movie will be horrible the more narration there is, especially if they say, "In a story/tale/epic/movie about..." Shouldn't your trailer have told us what the movie was about?
The Godfather trailer had no dialogue, and lots of plot spoilers.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/30/11 09:50

I use Potemra's method, too, except most of the time I don't even see a trailer. I just read a few reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. It gives me enough information to decide if I'm likely to enjoy the movie, and I very seldom end up seeing one I don't like.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
john l25
   07/30/11 10:37

Hmmm...the character who abuses drugs, fornicates, etc.,has basic decency. If an NR writer makes this conclusion, we can see how far we have spiralled downward in our culture. The country needs a Morality Tea Party.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/30/11 11:20

Thank goodness you posted. I made a bet last night that somewhere, somehow a culture warrior retard would slither in with some morality comment. I appreciate you not letting me down.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/30/11 11:37

You beat him to the punch, though, didn't you, ML? Out there making sure to set the tone with the first post.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/30/11 11:51

Heh, heh. That's very true. I posted that while drinking last night and the hunter instinct to flush 'em out always shines brightest when beer's involved.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Brett M.
   07/30/11 11:30

Michael, nobody boasts about sharing your "skill" at choosing movies because that's what EVERYBODY does. You see trailers, read reviews AND allow them to inform your decisions? Wow... tell me more.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Annie G.
   07/30/11 13:10

Um, when I read reviews and/or see a trailer for a movie I don't think I'd like, I don't see that movie. Unless a person is a film critic or otherwise compelled to see movies that don't interest him, why go see a movie when the impression from trailers and reviews is negative? My score is probably 97% on movies I've thought I'd like from the trailers and reviews, too. It just seems logical.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/30/11 13:58

Uh, yes. It's uncanny that you end up liking a large percentage of movies for which you've read the reviews and sampled the trailer in advance before choosing which to see. Absolutely uncanny. Almost psychic.

(?)

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact