Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Corner

The one and only.

Print   |  Text
 

Egypt’s Revolution in Tatters

The forcible expulsion of young, secular protesters from their encampment in Cairo’s Tahrir Square — with the enthusiastic help of ordinary Egyptians — has the feeling of a watershed moment. So does the imminent appearance of former Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak in an iron cage to stand trial on live television.

The young, secular protesters in Tahrir Square have been badly outmaneuvered in a three-way contest between themselves, the ruling military council, and the country’s rising Islamists. The optimistic view of the revolution held that Egypt’s Islamists were artificially propped up by their status as the only available outlet for anti-regime sentiment. Supposedly, the Islamists were destined to decline as a raft of newly empowered democratic parties sparked the enthusiasm of the public.

The truth was the opposite. Once government suppression of the Islamists was lifted, they were legitimized and empowered. The military regime struck up an informal alliance with the Muslim Brotherhood, as defense against the students’ desire to strip the military of its business interests and power. The Obama administration’s openly expressed willingness to work with the Muslim Brotherhood — implicitly refusing to hold American aid hostage to keeping the Islamists in check — removed the last potential obstacle to an Islamist renaissance. The result was the recent immense demonstration in which, not only the Muslim Brotherhood but a wide array of even harder-line Islamists turned on the badly outnumbered students, demanding an end to secularism and a fully Islamic state.

The supposedly secular and liberal pro-democracy protesters were never particularly liberal at all. Rather, they are a motley collection of hard-leftists and Arab nationalists, with only a very few “liberals” mixed in, many of whom would barely be recognizable as liberals to most Westerners. These protesters have deluded themselves into believing that the broader Egyptian public stands with them. That delusion is protected, above all, by the refusal of the supposed pro-democracy forces to organize a serious political coalition and undertake an aggressive campaign to contest the upcoming elections. The protesters keep asking for electoral delays so as to give them more time to organize against the Islamists, yet they never seem to leave Tahrir Square to actually take their case to the people.

The truth is that the Tahrir protesters are less democrats than a new incarnation of the Arab street, more equipped and inclined to achieve their goals through rabble-rousing than through modern electoral politics. Sensing that they cannot defeat the Islamists at the ballot box, their strategy has been to rally the people to their side with demands to put Mubarak and his cronies on trial. The hope is to energize public anger, discredit the remnants of the old regime still clinging to power, force the military to adopt a secular bill of rights before an Islamist-dominated parliament can re-write the constitution, and ultimately push the military rulers aside.

This strategy is yet another hopeless dream of seizing power with no real base from which to work. The recent demonstrations organized by the secularists were supposed to recruit the Islamists to their agenda of putting the old regime on trial and undercutting the military. That failed when the Islamists refused to be co-opted and turned on the secularists. Meanwhile, the broader Egyptian public has also turned sharply against the protesters. The ongoing street disruptions have killed off Egypt’s essential tourist industry, hollowed out an already disastrously weak economy, kept the police forces in disarray, and generally kept the country barely functional for months. That’s why the public joined in to help the military eject the demonstrators from Tahrir Square just a day before Mubarak’s trial.

Now Mubarak will appear in his cage, but with the students out of Tahrir Square and unable to rally the public against the regime. Quite possibly, after a day or two of spectacle, the trial will go into recess. The revolutionists will have been checkmated, and a government run jointly by the military and the Islamists will be left to take root. No doubt, Egypt’s Islamists now look to Turkey as a model for how to undercut the military over time. They will be patient, while enjoying substantial power in the meantime.

We are a long way from liberal democracy in Egypt. And as Egypt goes, so goes the Arab Spring.

New on The Corner. . .


COMMENTS   7

EXPAND  

Michael K
   08/02/11 10:59

The "Bourgeoise" phase of the Egyptian Revolution lasted only what 6 months. Compare that to what historians call the Moderate Phase of the French Revolution from 1789-1792.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   08/02/11 11:04

Interesting note at the end regarding Turkey. Quite a contrast in point of view relative to how the WSJ Op-Ed was portraying the decline of Turkey's military today...

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Martin Hutchinson
   08/02/11 11:05

The US government and notably and un-forgiveably National Review, were on the wrong side on this one -- backing woolly-headed notions of "Arab spring" against the reality that Mubarak was about as good as it was likely to get in Egypt. If he had been allowed to organize the succession to his son or his VP, Egypt might have still been our ally and the Egyptians (most of whom backed Mubarak and were not "Mubarak's thugs" --another gross NR error) would have continued to grow modestly richer and happier.

Obama knew no better, but NR should have done.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
wpa38
   08/02/11 11:11

Shouldn't have been a surprise. If you'd been listening to NPR, you would have heard this February interview with historian Rufus Fears, who saw exactly what would happen.

Is Fears a psychic? No, he just learns from the patterns of history.

External Link 

Unlike neocons, who take pride in deriving the exact opposite lesson from every event in history, and then wonder why things aren't going their way.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Michael K
   08/02/11 12:48

Great link. Considering Egypt was under Hellenistic/Roman influence for several centuries Mr. Fears implication is the Arab takeover basically wiped out any long term influence that might of been gained from that period.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   08/02/11 20:03

Its a well trod path - go ask the Persian with the Turks en-route. The west is just starting to be worked on....

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   08/02/11 15:27

Deja vu all over again!

Obama's handling of the "Arab spring" (withdrawing support from authoritarian allies while playing nice with authoritarian enemies) is a repeat of what Carter did when he set off a decade of civil war in Central America.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact