Look, I am past exhausted talking about liberal media bias. It’s real, we all know it, and people who deny it aren’t even fooling themselves. But some things just have to be pointed out. This morning I watched the first 15 minutes of the Today Show. I don’t particularly love or even like the program, but I find it useful to see what the producers think is the big news of the day. And sometimes Chuck Todd is on, and I like him. If I sound defensive about watching the show it’s only because I am.
Anyway, the first ten minutes was about Gabby Giffords’ return to the House yesterday. I’m not sure it merited the full ten minutes or trumped the hard news that later followed, but it’s a great story and everyone is rooting for the lady, so I’m fine with it.
But think about this for a second. The Giffords shooting sent the media elite in this country into a bout of St. Vitus’s dance that would have warranted an army of exorcists in previous ages. Sarah Palin’s Facebook map was an evil totem that forced some guy to go on a shooting spree. The New York Times, the Washington Post, all three broadcast networks — particularly NBC whose senior foreign-affairs correspondent, Andrea Mitchell, devotes, by my rough reckoning, ten times as much air time to whining about Sarah Palin as she does about anything having to do with foreign affairs — flooded the zone with “Have you no shame” finger wagging. A memo went forth demanding that everyone at MSNBC get their dresses over their heads about the evil “tone” from the right. Media Matters went into overdrive working the interns 24/7 to “prove” that Republicans deliberately foment violence with their evil targets on their evil congressional maps.
Everyone “knew” the shooter was a tea partier. Except he wasn’t. He wasn’t even a conservative. He was a sick, demented, nutball. And it still didn’t matter! More bleating and caterwauling about the “tone” followed. More chin stroking and tut-tutting from Meet the Press roundtables and “very special segments” on the Today Show. More pizzas were ordered for the Media Matters galley slaves.
Finally, president Obama, our national-healer, gives a speech. It was a good speech. Indeed it was one of the first speeches in a long while that got anything like bipartisan support. Civility. New tone. No more martial metaphors. These were the takeaways.
So flashforward to this week. Tom Friedman — who knows a bit about Hezbollah — calls the tea partiers the “Hezbollah faction” of the GOP bent on taking the country on a “suicide mission.” All over the place, conservative Republicans are “hostage takers” and “terrorists,” “terrorists” and “traitors.” They want to “end life as we know it on this planet,” says Nancy Pelosi. They are betraying the Founders, too. Chris Matthews all but signs up for the “Make an Ass of Yourself” contest at the State Fair. Joe Nocera writes today that “the Tea Party Republicans can put aside their suicide vests.” Lord knows what Krugman and Olbermann have said.
Then last night, on the very day Gabby Giffords heroically returns to cast her first vote since that tragic attack seven months ago, the vice president of the United States calls the Republican party a bunch of terrorists.
No one cares. I hate the “if this were Bush” game so we’re in luck. Instead imagine if this was Dick Cheney calling the Progressive Caucus (or whatever they’re called) a “bunch of terrorists” on the day Giffords returned to the Congress. Would the mainstream media notice or care? Would Meet the Press debate whether this raises “troubling questions” about the White House’s sensitivity? Would Andrea Mitchell find some way to blame Sarah Palin for Dick Cheney’s viciousness? Would Keith Olbermann explode like a mouse subjected to the Ramone’s music in Rock and Roll High School? Something inside me hidden away shouts, “Hell yes they would!”
The Today Show even had Debbie Wasserman Schultz on this morning for five minutes talking about Giffords. No one thought to ask her what she thought of Biden’s comments? It’s not like she’s the Democratic party’s national spokesperson or anything. Oh, wait. She is!
Instead, after the full ten minutes on Giffords, we get an update about the debt-limit situation (which is supposedly an Armageddon-level issue) and Kelly O’Donnell basically carries water for Biden on the issue by completely muddying whether he said anything of the sort at all. (His office says, no, no the vice president didn’t call them terrorists, he just politely agreed with all the Democratic congressmen in the room that they “acted like terrorists.” Ah, this is a distinction a team of a million Jesuits working around the clock would have a hard time slicing.)
And yet you know the next time there’s the slightest, remotely exploitable tragedy or hint of violence, the same reporters, editors, producers, and politicians are going to insist that blood was spilled because of the right wing’s rhetoric.
Well, go to Hell. All of you.
Amen Jonah!
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThis is the life we've chosen.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThis rant is... it's rather beautiful.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseDo you ever get tired of playing the victim card? Hope you feel better after the tantrum.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseFirst, easy to say when it's someone else's ox being gored.
Second ... you seriously want to contend the MSM plays it fair & down-the-middle? Really?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseDon't let Kevin get to you. He has an... uncomfortable realtionship with facts
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSanctimony doesn't get to me.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse" . . . and don't let the door hit you on the way out!"
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"Ah, this is a distinction a team of a million Jesuits working around the clock would have a hard time slicing."
Doubt that the Jesuits will work overtime on this one. And I had zero clue that they did news any more on Today. I thought it was a cooking and fashion show now. You know, lifestyle, baby. Silly me.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"Well, go to Hell. All of you."
Well, finally. A little vehemence where it was most needed and earned. Many of us have grown quite weary of conservative pols who tolerate the sort of bad behavior from fellow pols that they would not tolerate from total strangers who aren't in the club.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseRick, you are spot on here. I'm tired of hearing conservatives try to downplay what the leftists say - whether the leftists are comedians, cartoonists (check this out: External Link
), politicians, bloggers, pundits, or whatever.
We must stop giving them a pass.
Many of the things those people say are what I like to call "fighting words" and if said directly to me in person would warrant a punch in the mouth.
And no, I'm not kidding.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseNot very often that I get excited reading a column. Kudos, Jonah. And, love the headline.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseNice rant. Loved it.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseYES
Keep this up - throw it back at them. Enough of the polite, mewing coward acts!
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI will start taking your righteous anger about liberal bias seriously (and I agree that the Vice President referring to elected representatives as “terrorists” is wrong, wrong, wrong) when you, or anyone at National Review, for that matter, says anything even mildly critical of the overt bias displayed by Megan Kelly, or the clowns on the Fox morning show, or criticize the race-baiting ugliness of National Review benefactor Rush “Obama is a man-child (i.e, “boy”) whose policies are disguised reparations for black people and make black kids beat up white kids on the school bus” Limbaugh.
And I seem to remember, Jonah, you stating that you “largely agreed” with Glenn Beck’s statement that Obama has a deep-seated hatred for white culture. Glass houses, Jonah . . .
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"Obama is a man-child"
What "acceptable" term is there for a grown man who acts like a child?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseHmm, typical liberal rant.
Anyone who disagrees with me is evil.
It doesn't matter that everything he quotes from Rush is right, what matters is that some liberals feelings were hurt.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseOh please ....
#1, The voices on the right have maybe 1/4 the power & influence of the MSM. The left throws 3 or 4 times the garbage it ever catches - and you want to play the "moral equivalency" game? "Yes, you're only doing 25% of the shooting ... but until you stop, I'm not even going to dream of calling out the other side."
#2, you complain about conservative media; we get hit with liberal media & their "team" in Congress & the White House.
#3, 'race-baiting' is apparently in the eyes of the beholder .... or haven't you noticed how quickly the left invokes race in its attacks on conservatives? I guess it's OK when the other side does it, huh?
For the record - IF Limbaugh said what you say, then it was a stupid,foolish, racial statement.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe race card is so yesterday.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseYou guys really need new material.
Good points Mr. Goldberg, but just between ourselves, isn't it barely possible that the tea partiers invite some of this with their own overblown rhetoric and intemperate comments? They've not been known for their civility after all. I know the media people should be professional and adult enough to not be dragged down to the tea party level, but, boy oh boy, they can be so provoking!
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse