Google+
Close

The Corner

The one and only.

The Commodification of Hope and Life?



Text  



The New York Times Magazine realized it had been way too long since it had a selective-reduction piece and so here is a new one: “The Two-Minus-One Pregnancy.” There is much to say, but a little quote for a little food for thought: 

“Things would have been different if we were 15 years younger or if we hadn’t had children already or if we were more financially secure,” she said later. “If I had conceived these twins naturally, I wouldn’t have reduced this pregnancy, because you feel like if there’s a natural order, then you don’t want to disturb it. But we created this child in such an artificial manner — in a test tube, choosing an egg donor, having the embryo placed in me — and somehow, making a decision about how many to carry seemed to be just another choice. The pregnancy was all so consumerish to begin with, and this became yet another thing we could control.”

 



Text