Great crises often produce great leaders. Unfortunately, sometimes the timing isn’t right, and neither is the leader.
Barack Obama came into office in the midst of a great economic crisis. Although hopes were high, he did not rise to the occasion. Now that the clouds of enthusiasm and excitement have parted, we see he was obviously unsuited for the task at hand.
President Obama has failed to meet America’s economic challenges.
His three years of spending, regulating, and taxing have not restarted the economy. Unemployment remains at a shocking 9.1 percent. Economic growth is hovering on the edge of a renewed recession.
Abroad, the standing of the United States appears uncertain and adrift under the failed leadership of a president who prefers chastising allies to condemning foes.
Fortunately, America may get a second chance: Mitt Romney is running for president, and I am proud to endorse him.
Alone among the contenders, he possesses the unique qualifications to confront and master our severe economic predicament. His abiding faith in our country’s exceptional historical position as a beacon of freedom will make him the most important leader in a world that depends upon a strong America to stay at peace.
As governor of Massachusetts, he turned that state’s budget around from deficit to surplus while simultaneously cutting taxes, but that is not the full measure of what he will bring to the presidency. His time in government was a moment of service — a way to give back to our country — following a distinguished career in the private sector, where he launched companies and turned around troubled ones.
When the 2002 Winter Olympics were on the verge of collapse thanks to a bid-rigging scandal, Romney was asked to take over. The attacks of September 11 created a security nightmare. Romney presided over a highly complex security mobilization, addressed the management troubles plaguing the games, and staged one of the most memorable competitions ever seen on American soil.
Romney is running for president because he is deeply committed to our country, and troubled by its current condition. I believe he can turn it around.
He’s formulated an economic plan — a set of alternatives to the government-oriented programs that Barack Obama has put in place — that is unparalleled in the history of American electoral campaigns. By pressing for fundamental change in the way that Washington taxes and spends, issues regulations, uses energy, interacts with our major trading partners, and deals with our labor force, he fully envisions a way to place America back on the path toward rapid economic growth and full employment.
And at his core, Mitt Romney is a man of great character. He and his wife, Ann, have been married for more than four decades. She is the love of his life. Together, they have five sons and 16 grandchildren.
But he’s not only a family man, he is a man of principle. He believes in the bedrock conservative ideals of limited government and free enterprise. He will stand up for America’s allies when they are threatened, with fortitude. And he will face down our adversaries. He is a formidable person, and he will certainly be a formidable president. Our allies can count on it, and our enemies should expect it.
Crises indeed produces great leaders. Sometimes it just takes awhile.
Even after the social security attack.
RINOs of a feather flock together.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe question we should all be asking this RINO is, who should Republicans choose as their nominee: the three-time elected governor of the most successful conservative state, or the RINO who couldn't even beat that other RINO McCain in 2008?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIt's not worth turning out to vote for Romney; as the social security fracas has shown he will just cave to the left and the media at every opportunity. If we can't get a decent nominee, it's much better to let Obama wreck the country for another four years, and hope that a good nominee in 2016 will keep the Dems out for 20 years.
Alternatively, we can nominate someone now who will actually pursue decent policies if elected. Paul, Bachmann and Perry all seem reasonable possibilities.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWith all due respect, Mr. Pawlenty, I believe your endorsement of Romney, prior to any primary vote, is ill-advised and reduces you in my esteem.
I had been watching your run for the Presidency with interest and, at least, thought you wise for realizing you weren't going to finish even within the top 3 to continue.
I have now changed my mind about your "wisdom".
Pity.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThis of course has nothing to do with Romney paying off Pawlenty's campaign debt and also has nothing to do with the notion that Romney would need a "down home" midwesterner to balance his ticket. My guess? Pawlenty was smart enough to realize he is personally better off with Romney as our nominee than Perry, and he is putting his own needs above his party and his country.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI agree with Mr. Pawlenty. No candidate can be all things to all people. Mr. Romney can be enough of things to enough people to defeat Mr. Obama, and that, above all else is what must be done.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseStrong endorsement...until this:
"But he’s not only a family man, he is a man of principle. He believes in the bedrock conservative ideals of limited government and free enterprise."
Er, Romneycare?
Yeah, I get that he was in Mass. and that it comes with the territory, but his inability to come up with a good answer to what's so wrong with Obamacare is troubling. After Romneycare passed, did the healthcare financial situation improve in his state or worsen? What would he do differently? How would he fix the legislation he signed?
It's not enough to say, "It had a veto-proof majority, so I'll sign it anyway" because that's about as opposite of "character" and "principled" as you can get.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWell said, RTP.
How does signing Romneycare *because* there was a veto-proof majority make this whole debacle better? If he was truly a principled conservative, he would have vetoed it and dared the legislature to pass it anyway. I certainly would have more respect for him.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseEspecially when four years ago he was running on how he got everyone in Mass health care. And was proud of it.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI can't believe nobody is noticing his change since the last campaign.
Looks like Romney has his nominee for VP!
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abusethere is a reason why he quickly backed off "Obamneycare."
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"And at his core, Mitt Romney is a man of great character."
Men of great character don't authorize slanderous "scare the seniors" campaigns against their fellow Republicans.
That act, by itself, permanently cost Romney my support.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseGuess who wants to be a Vice Presidential candidate. Doesn't have the nerve to jump on Romney to his face, now this. Loser.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"Guess who wants to be a Vice Presidential candidate."
Ahhhh. By George, I think you've got it.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbusePawlenty can have an imaginary position in an imaginary romney administration.
That's all romney and pawlenty will be able to do: play pretend president and vice president. Romney isn't going to get the nomination, and pawlenty can go back to MN and find some way to spend his time.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI doubt he's VP material. If he really wanted to be VP he'd be endorsing Perry since he could serve as a Midwestern, slightly less fiery counterweight to Perry. He brings nothing to the table for Romney. He must be gunning for a Cabinet spot.
Maybe he'll go back to MN and gear up for a run against that comedic genius they've got representing them in the Senate.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbusePawlenty has as much chance at the Veep nomination as I do. I'd say Rubio is the favorite right now because FL is such a pivotal state in the election. Take the Sunshine State away from Barry and things get dicey for him. Cut into Obama's Hispanic support and things get even dicier.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseYes, that contest has officially begun. Pawlenty did a two fer by aligning himself with one of the more moderate of the candidates. His recent political career reminds me of the episode of the Simpsons where Homer was in a yard full of rakes and kept stepping on them and flinging the handles in his face.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThat was Sideshow Bob, not Homer. How can we trust you on the big issues if you cannot get the details right? (That's a joke in case anyone is tempted to go marching through a field of rakes to express their indignation regarding my focus on the trivial.)
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseGee, I thought he was gonna endorse Michele Bachmann (wink).
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse