Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Corner

The one and only.

Print   |  Text
 

No Explicit Right to Vote for Saudi Women

Over the weekend, Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah issued a vaguely worded decree about women’s political rights that has been widely reported as meaning that women have been given the right to vote in municipal elections and can be appointed to the king’s consultative council. But there is less to the king’s announcement than meets the eye.

The king did not use the word “vote” and granted no explicit right to vote for women in his kingdom. The key operative phrase is “participate in the nomination of candidates.” What this means exactly is unclear, but it certainly does not guarantee a right to vote. Whether women’s voting rights are implied will depend on how it is interpreted by the king in four years.

Under the king’s new decree: Women can nominate other candidates or be nominated themselves for municipal council elections, during the next election cycle in 2015 (not the one taking place this week). The elections have two parts: the first is a process of nominating candidates that requires a certain number of supporters; the second entails the actual voting by the electorate. The king did not specifically state they could ever actually vote in the second phase of these future elections. This may be implied or it may not. It should also be noted that the municipal councils have no policymaking authority, such as giving women the right to vote, or even to drive. 

Under the decree, they can also now be appointed by the king to the consultative Shura Council, what the New York Times calls a “toothless body that avoids matters of royal prerogative, like where the nation’s oil revenue goes.” 

A translation of the relevant section of the decree follows:

 . . . So we have decided the following:

 First: women’s participation in the Shura Council as members in the next round, according to legal parameters.

 Second: starting in the next round, women are entitled to nominate themselves for membership in municipal councils, and they are also entitled to participate in the nomination of candidates, according to the parameters of the true law.

Your due, imperative for us — O brothers and sisters — is that we strive for the fulfillment of every instruction (or command) in which is your dignity, your honor, and your well-being. Our due, imperative for you, is perspective and counsel, according to legal parameters and the certainties of [the Islamic] religion, and whoever departs from these regulations is arrogant and he will have to bear the responsibility of these actions.

Though the Shura and municipal councils have no policymaking power, women’s suffrage would be an important symbolic step in Saudi Arabia and resonates in the West, where recognizing women’s voting rights was a critical step in obtaining legal equality. 

We’ll just have to wait till 2015 and see whether the octogenarian King Abdullah interprets this decree as meaning women can vote. Or, for that matter, if he or his successor abides by the plain meaning of the decree, that women will be able to nominate themselves and others as candidates to the municipal councils. We can all agree, however, that this was a good public relations move during this endless Arab Spring.

New on The Corner. . .


COMMENTS   9

EXPAND  

   09/26/11 13:50

Summary: Don't hold your breath on the Saudi's (or any Islamic nation) moving out of the Seventh Century!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/26/11 13:54

The Emancipation Proclamation this ain't.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/26/11 13:58

You know what would be a "symbolic" step? Not having to walk around with a shroud covering a woman from head to toe. Not being a walking body bag would be a good thing.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Mr. Sandmich
   09/26/11 13:58

Cut the guy some slack. After all, has the state of liberty gotten better or worse in this country after women were given the right to vote?

*ducks rotten fruit*

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/26/11 14:57

I guess it's time for Obama to tell Abdullah that he's got to go.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/26/11 15:11

No offense to you Nina, but considering the voting patterns of women as a block, maybe it is the US who should be rethinking womens sufferage and not the Saudis.

** hides behind Mr. Sandmich for protection **

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
HOVDummy
   09/26/11 15:28

So what happens on election day when the male of the household refuses to drive the woman to the polls?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
RafiBaltimore
   09/26/11 16:05

Excellent article, Nina! Once again the House of Saud tries to hoodwink the world by offering an empty to gesture that looks like a nod to human rights but changes little if anything.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/26/11 21:55

Fascinating!
Saudi Arabia must follow your rules, because why?

Are you equally indignant when Mexico demands that illegals vote in U.S. elections?

The proper response to both is the same: it's none of your business.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact