Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

March 5 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Corner

The one and only.

Print   |  Text
 

The Solyndra Mess Gets Messier

Yesterday, the Department of Energy announced that it had approved new loan guarantees worth more than $1 billion for two solar energy companies:

DOE announced a $737 million loan guarantee to help finance construction of the Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project, a 110-megawatt solar-power-generating facility in Nye County, Nev. The project is sponsored by Tonopah Solar, a subsidiary of California-based SolarReserve.

The Energy Department said the project will result in 600 construction jobs and 45 permanent jobs…

The Energy Department also announced that it had finalized a separate $337 million loan guarantee to Sempra Energy for a 150-megawatt photovoltaic solar-generation project in Arizona.

The project will result in 300 construction jobs, DOE said.

Let’s see. Simple math, as the president would say, gives us a grand total of $1.074 billion spent to create, according to the DOE, just 45 permanent jobs. That’s about $24 million spent for every permanent job created. As far as the DOE’s “green” loans program is concerned, that’s par for the course. By any reasonable standard, it’s a horribly inefficient way to spend the taxpayers’ money.

With respect to Solyndra, the DOE shelled out $535 million to a company that happened to list a major Democratic fundraiser (George Kaiser) as a primary investor. Could there be a similar connection to any of these other companies? Of course there could.

As American Glob reports, Solar Reserve, the California-based enterprise at the heart of the $737 million loan guarantee mentioned above, is an “investment partner” with the Pacific Corporate Group. The executive director of PCG is Ron Pelosi, brother-in-law of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.). 

But that’s not all. Solar Reserve is also investment partners with Argonaut Private Equity, an arm of the (George) Kaiser Family Foundation that was a major investor in Solyndra and was involved in negotiations with the DOE to restructure the failed company’s loan agreement. That agreement would ultimately give Argonaut and other private investors priority status over the American taxpayer with respect to the first $75 million recovered in the event of Solyndra’s collapse. As Republicans argued at a recent House committee hearing, this arrangement was almost certainly a violation of federal statute.

Argonaut’s managing director, Steven Mitchell, served on Solyndra’s board when the restructuring took place, and reportedly still serves on the company’s board. He is also listed as a “board participant” at Solar Reserve:

Mitchell owes his position at Solyndra and Solar Reserve, apparently, to the fact that his primary employer, Argonaut Private Equity, invested in both companies. Mitchell holds the title of Managing Director for Argonaut Private Equity. After Solyndra declared bankruptcy, two Democratic members of the U.S. House asked that House Subcommittee call Mitchell to testify about Solyndra. Though he has not appeared before Congress, he has “been asked to provide documents to Congress” pertaining to Solyndra.

These connections certainly suggest that the Obama administration was not merely “felony dumb,” in the words of Rep. Brian Bilbray (R., Calif.), in its handling of the DOE loan program, but consciously corrupt. And at the moment, there are far too many questions that remain unanswered

New on The Corner. . .


COMMENTS   45

EXPAND  

HIgh Street
   09/29/11 16:11

What does it matter if no one is going to talk about it except conservative blogs.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/29/11 16:36

I know it seems discouraging, but the longer Fox News Channel sits at the top of the list of all news channels, the more these stories will catch fire. The liberal media is beginning to pull away from Obama because they know they can't survive if they remain in his cheering section. ABC is all over the Solyndra story, which is quite a change from where it was a few months ago.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/29/11 16:12

"Culture of corruption"!!!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/29/11 16:27

For $1 billion tax dollars, we get 45 permanent jobs and 900 construction (code for temporary) jobs and that's the President's idea of an effective job-creating plan.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
macofromoc
   09/29/11 16:37

Filling the swamp and digging new ones..

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Harpoon
   09/29/11 16:40

Gotta say it:

Time for the Solar Industry to be subject to Sunshine Laws!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
ddot
   09/29/11 16:49

Chicago community organizer-type money and politics all mixed into the reeking mess that is the Democrat machine.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Harris12
   09/29/11 16:49

Corruption and cronyism f cronyism is rampant in our government--it will not stop until we make it stop. In Texas, there is another story about a Dallas business owner, who was involved in a civil dispute and paid millions of dollars to lawyers, and when he objected to their fees, they had a “friendly” judge seize all of his property, without any notice or hearing, and essentially ordered him to be an involuntary servant to the lawyers. The business owner has been under this “servant” order for 10 months.

External Link  has an explanation of this really disturbing case.. The frequency of instances like these seems to be increasing exponentially even though they get little media attention

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/29/11 17:18

When will people wake up to the fact that the Eco Industrial Complex has this government completely wrapped around their fingers?

I've worked in the Tech industry for years. These giant venture funds and investment groups wield money they likes of which even God has never seen. And EVERY. SINGLE. ONE. of them has their hand in some sort of Solar or other Eco play. Where they all once invested in web companies, chip makers, and other high tech, they are now pouring billions of dollars into these Eco companies.

And why shouldn't they? With the government guaranteeing their loans, and millions of eco-fanatics keeping the government in line, the Eco Industrial Complex has every incentive to send money into these boondoggles.

Not only should we be worried that the taxpayer is footing the bill for these unprofitable endeavors, but we need to also wake up to the opportunity cost. Every dollar invested in Solyndra was a dollar that wasn't invested in the next Google, Intel, Amazon or Apple. Those companies that could have created real, tangible value for this country with new markets and boosted productivity will never be funded. Instead we get solar farms that produce more expensive electricity, and 1/100th the jobs.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/29/11 18:05

"Eco Industrial Complex" is an incredibly apt description for the mix of activists, Government cronys, and corrupt businesses that can't make a go of it in the open competitive market so they turn to extorting public funds. At least with the military industrial complex we got real tangible products that could be used to protect our citizens, as well as hundreds of thousands of high end engineering and manufacturing jobs (plus the money from export of the finished goods).

We don't even get reliable electricity from the Eco Industrial Complex.

Good one - this is the first time I have seen the term and it really fits - kudos

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Jabb
   09/29/11 17:20

Torches.

Pitchforks.

Even TorchForks, if you have one.

It seems nothing else is going to solve the problem.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
 JEM
   09/29/11 20:10

Jefferson would approve. Isn't he a good democrat?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Jabb
   09/29/11 20:48

Republican/Democrat is just red-team/blue-team sports nonsense.

I'm for freedom over statism. The current incarnation of both Democrats and Republicans are for statism, so they're both worthless to me.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/29/11 17:27

>"Let’s see. Simple math, as the president would say, gives us a grand total of $1.074 billion spent to create, according to the DOE, just 45 permanent jobs. That’s about $24 million spent for every permanent job created."

For God's sake, no. We spend $1.074 billion only if the companies default on their loans, which will be privately financed. If that happens, then we spend $1.074 to create NO jobs. If the companies are successful and pay off their debt, we spend nothing for (hopefully) 45 permanent jobs.

Criticize that bet if you like, but try not to butcher the basic facts. A loan guarantee is not a loan.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Bob D.
   09/29/11 17:38

The point of the article is that enterprise should be invested by private investors and NOT Big Brother who can't even manage the postal service. While China rolls the clock back to capatilism, we're busy rolling ourselves into socialism and the debt that comes with it.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/29/11 17:57

And Stiles makes that point without understanding the topic that he's writing about, which ought to at least raise questions about the quality of his conclusions.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/29/11 18:35

Stiles is simply cutting to the chase. Technically, of course, you are correct. But what is the probability of these loans ever being paid back? This is a riskless bet for the insiders, and that will generate numerous pathologies. For instance, what incentive is there for parsimony at the venture now? None. That is a BIG difference the "loan guarantee" makes whether or not it is used. How will compensation be handled? How will expenses be handled? How will outside contracting be handled? The most critical financial parameter in a start-up is the cash burn rate. Investors watch this like a hawk because even a viable venture can be ruined if you burn out your money before you get to the finish line. Why does the venture investor care about this? Because they lose all their money if the venture fails! Would you like to bet whether the "loan guarantee" will be used? Would you like to bet whether or not the "loan guarantee" when used will be defaulted on?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
 JEM
   09/29/11 20:14

And lets remember, on Solyndra, the insiders - ahem Obama's backers - got their payoff. The taxpayers will get nothing.

Throw every politician in jail who approved an investment to a donor or family member.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Johan
   09/30/11 00:00

False. Whatever your source is for these things you ought to look for a new one. What payoff?

You sound like a crank.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/29/11 21:05

> "But what is the probability of these loans ever being paid back?"

The DOE estimates 10% of the loans will go bad. Since the solar program started in 2005, just over 1% have gone bad (Solyndra). So yes: if you want to make a separate bet on each of the loan guarantees being paid out, I'll take them all and clean up.

External Link 

Your arguments about market distortion are valid. And yet loan guarantees are nothing new. GOP and Dems both push them for their pet energy sectors (nukes in the GOP's case.)

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Load More Comments

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact