The New York Times reports on another “politically connected clean energy start-up that has relied heavily on an Obama administration loan guarantee and is now facing financial turmoil.”
The company is Nevada Geothermal Power, which like Solyndra, the now-famous California solar company, is struggling with debt after encountering problems at its only operating plant.
After a series of technical missteps that are draining Nevada Geothermal’s cash reserves, its own auditor concluded in a filing released last week that there was “significant doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern.”
If that sounds familiar, it is because that is exactly the same conclusion auditors from PriceWaterhouseCoopers came to in March 2010 after looking into Solyndra’s finances before a planned $300 million initial public offering, which was subsequently canceled. Andy McCarthy discusses the serious implications of the “going concern” language here:
The “going concern” language is not boilerplate. As Townhall finance maven John Ransom explains, it is a term of art to which auditors resort when there is an extraordinary need to protect themselves and the company from legal liability. Angry investors who’ve lost their shirts tend to scapegoat the loser company’s accountants. In truth, even if the accountants affixed a neon “going concern” sign to the company’s financial statements, investors would have no one but themselves to blame. But it is unusual: The language is absent from the statements of many companies that actually end up going bankrupt. Auditors reserve it for the hopeless causes — like Solyndra.
While the federal government’s investment in Nevada Geothermal — $79 million in loan guarantees plus about $70 million in grants — is substantially less than the $530 million (in loan guarantees) it put up for Solyndra, this has all the familiar signs of corporate cronyism run amok:
The Nevada Geothermal project has benefited from the support of a bipartisan collection of Nevada politicians, most notably Senator Harry Reid, a Democrat and the Senate majority leader, who has called his home state the “Saudi Arabia of geothermal energy.”
Nationally, geothermal energy produces only about 3,000 megawatts of power, a minuscule slice of the national electricity supply. The Nevada Geothermal plant generates just 35 megawatts — enough to serve about 35,000 homes for a year — and the company has only 22 employees in the state.
But Mr. Reid has taken the nascent geothermal industry under his wing, pressuring the Department of Interior to move more quickly on applications to build clean energy projects on federally owned land and urging other member of Congress to expand federal tax incentives to help build geothermal plants, benefits that Nevada Geothermal has taken advantage of.
“This project is exactly the type of initiative we need to ensure Nevada creates good-paying jobs,” Mr. Reid said in a statement in April 2010, after he visited the company’s Nevada plant. That was two months before the project even got conditional approval for the Energy Department loan guarantee.
$150 million in federal backing for a company favored by a top Democrat and that employs just 22 people. “Exactly the type of initiative we need,” indeed. As it turns out, the Geothermal industry is notoriously susceptible to financial difficulties, and is considered an even riskier investment than wind or solar. The Times reports that the Obama administration was well aware of the risks involved when it agreed to award Nevada Geothermal a second loan package worth nearly $100 million. But that’s not all:
During the tour, Mr. Reid had a chance to see electric generation equipment installed by a company called Ormat Technology, which is a Nevada Geothermal partner. Ormat’s lobbyist in Washington, Kai Anderson, and one of the company’s top executives, Paul Thomsen, are former aides to Mr. Reid.
Just last month, again with Mr. Reid’s support, Ormat secured its own Energy Department loan guarantee, worth $350 million, to help support three other Nevada geothermal projects that are expected to produce 113 megawatts of power.
Mr. Reid has received some support from the industry, in the form of at least $43,000 worth of campaign contributions from the geothermal industry since 2009, according to an analysis of federal campaign finance records.
Nevada Geothermal executives are currently working to renegotiate a loan agreement (worth $91 million) in an effort to avoid default, which could happen as soon as December. Whatever happens, one hopes that at the very least, private investors won’t be given priority status as they were when the DOE restructured Solyndra’s loan guarantee. Either way, the administration certainly has some (more) explaining to do.
Stupid Americans. Not buying into it. Guess BHO will have to double energy prices again to get our minds right.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWhat a day at NRO. Michael Walsh complaining that BHO has the temerity to raise funds! Perry has been "smeared"! Andy McCarthy cites the always-reliable Breitbart on BHO's "shocking" behavior, hoping for a scandal of "breathtaking" scope! Mark Steyn agrees with Walsh that BHO is arrogant in trying to get re-elected! Andrew Stiles hops and prays that the next scandal has stronger legs than "Solyndra"! Kind of early to panic, folks. Yep, nobody likes Romney; Perry is a terrible debater; and Christie probably won't run, and even if he did the tea party would find plenty to despise about him. But there's 13 months to go. Plenty of time left to convince just enough folks that, no matter how awful the GOP candidate is (and he will be awful), at least he's 100% american.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAnd your point is? That Osucksasprez is a shoe in for re-election? See you in November 2012.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseCan't you just revel in the fact that your guy closed Gitmo, nixed the Patriot Act & brought our troops home from abroad?
Now go play your bongo's and chant:
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThis is what kleptocracy looks like!
As an auditor, giving the client a going concern opinion is to be avoided at all cost as it is like the kiss of death. As an advisor, I would never, ever, let a client invest in a company with a going concern issue. But apparently the government thinks differently.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAs a retired CPA, let me second the comment on the 'going concern' opinion. This opinion is reserved for patently hopeless situations. Moreover, it always given over the strenuous objection of the company and only after substantial internal deliberation, usually with consultation at very high levels within the auditing firm.
I'd like to see the stats on how many companies survive after receiving a going concern opinion. I doubt the survival rate is very high and probably more like nearly non-existent.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe core theme is that cronyism and corruption is pervasive throughout our government(it is bipartisan).
Consider this recent case in Texas about a business owner, who was involved in a civil dispute. He paid millions of dollars to lawyers, and when he objected to their fees, they had a “friendly” judge seize all of his property, without any notice or hearing, and essentially ordered him to be an involuntary servant to the lawyers. The business owner has been under this "servant" order for 10 months and is prohibited from owning any possessions, prohibited from working, etc...
External Link
has details about this disturbing case.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThere's yet another "next Solyndra" brewing in Tennessee. The even more insidious part of the story (link below) is that the EPA gave a big grant to a truck stop for "green" technology even though their economics were already heading south and the owners had been guilty of financial improprieties previously. Why? Because it seems it is not part of EPA's procedure in giving grant money for "green" purposes to even ASK for a background check or financials from the recipient!!! As long as it is officially 'green' they don't even care to ASK if it is solvent! I expect this story will get bigger soon because with that policy, it can't be the only financial/stimulus/green skeleton in EPA's closet of horrors. Take a look and see what you think:
http://www.tennessean.com/article/20111003/NEWS0201/310020028/E-Tenn-truck-stop-got-stimulus-money-despite-bankruptcy?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|FRONTPAGE
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseA major question here is how much of a payment did Harry Reid or one of his creepy little sons get from this company? Nothing happens in Nevada that doesn't have harry's or his creepy kids finger in the pie.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseDon't you worry. The MSM will put its full weight behind following the money.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAn astute observation! Hopefully Nevadans will survive and overturn Reid's dynasty as Americans are surviving and overturning Obama's dynasty as regular folk (i.e. voters) wake up and smell the coffee.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI'm confused. Why is a company named, "Goethermal" doing stuff with Solar?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThere is a difference in this project. It was financially possible for it to work. If unforseen technical problems had not arisen it would have. It still may after bankruptcy. Solyndra never had a chance to make money because it produced expensive energy.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThis is rather like saying it would have worked if it would have worked. There are always "unforeseens" in tech companies. That's why the feds shouldn't try to pick winners and losers, even moreso in fields they know nothing about.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseHAHAHA!!! You sound like Wesley Mouch.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseRegarding the "going concern" opinion. One of the foundational precepts of accrual based dual entry accounting is that the company is a going concern. Otherwise it would not make sense to amortize things like buildings and equipment since the company isn't going to continue operating. It would make more sense to expense everything immediately and value all assets at their "fair value" among other changes. As a result when it is a question whether a company can continue on the auditor will issue a going concern opinion which alerts the reader to look at the balance sheet and income statement in a different way.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseLet me second HenryC's point - some geothermal in Nevada could well work. There is about 2,000 MWe of capacity, apparently, that could be developed.
However, the problems are transmission access to the California market and getting geothermal considered a "green" electrical source so that it can counted in AB32 quotas.
The California wind and solar lobbies have successfully fought both.
That said, this particular project could well have been a boondoogle.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe capital cost of a new nuclear plant may be 10 billion, making these numbers not unreasonable. Geothermal is the best and most easily dispatched of the renewable sources.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThink about how many Cowboy Poetry Festivals they could have sponsored with that money! Harry should be ashamed.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThis is a Democratic 'slight of hand' to appear magical: they take perfectly green money and instantly turn it red.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse