Trenton, N.J. — For a week, I’ve been in this small capital on the banks of the Delaware, waiting to see if Gov. Chris Christie will announce his final thoughts on 2012. Since he returned Thursday from his Reagan library speech, he’s been mum, avoiding the press. His public appearances, such as his Sunday stop in Sea Girt, have offered few clues.
But at dusk Monday, in a low-key swearing-in ceremony, Christie hinted at his thinking. At least that’s the takeaway, according to state politicos I spoke with this morning.
In brief remarks, reported by the Newark Star-Ledger, Christie noted — speaking to state employees but before a crowd of national and local reporters — that politicians often are celebrated, praised, and cajoled, that people “blow smoke” toward power. He then told listeners, without context, that he tries to avoid getting trapped in such plumes.
“You can become intoxicated by that smoke,” Christie said “And you can wind up, as the smoke gets thicker and thicker, losing your way. Losing that inner compass that we all hope remains true to who we are and what our role is in whatever position or authority we hold.”
“He wouldn’t say that, at that event, if he was running,” a high-ranking state Republican tells me. “He knew exactly what he was doing. An announcement, to end all this, is going to come soon,” he predicts. “From what I can tell, his team is enjoying the attention, and he is too, but he’s telling us, without making a big to-do, about what’s he’s going to do — not run.”
Other Christie confidants, who have been 50–50 for days about a late-entry candidacy, now suspect the same. Indeed, sources close to Christie confirm that “the decision has been made,” but have been tight-lipped about revealing it. That said, they are not, with a wink, telling me to call up New Hampshire GOP leaders to prep for campaign coverage. If anything, even on background, they try to play down the story, to mute the chatter.
When I mention that it sounds like he’s not running, and that they’re not working, at all, to build a campaign, most sources don’t quibble with that point. In fact, with a hint of regret, one all but tells me that he has decided against it: “He is definitely leaning in a certain direction. It’s all about when he makes public what I know — and we have to respect his timeline,” he says.
My reporting suggests that he will not run. Whether in Westfield, or under the capitol’s gold dome, I’ve met and spoke with countless Jersey operatives, donors, and influential Republicans. Not one of them has ever revealed anything about a fledging Christie ’12 effort, even in private conversations. Think about that: For a week, nothing has leaked out about Christie doing anything but thinking about it. Sure, they all confirm, calls from top Republicans, such as Gov. John Kasich, are coming in. But beyond that, nada.
Here’s what I’ve heard: Christie’s team hasn’t reached out to more than a handful of top donors and contributors. Christie himself, many say, has done little to no outreach to the donor community. There is still interest in setting up a powerful political-action committee for a bid, but no green-light, and no official behind-the-scenes machinations from the governor’s circle. Everyone remains in a holding pattern.
Media reports are slowly beginning to confirm the emerging Trenton consensus. The Wall Street Journal reports this morning that Christie told Republican donors in California last week that he will not run. “[He] told prominent California fund-raisers and donors as recently as last Wednesday he had no plans to seek the White House,” the Journal writes. “One assurance took the form of a pledge Mr. Christie made to Meg Whitman, the newly appointed Hewlett-Packard Co. chief executive, said two people familiar with the matter.”
Christie’s team has also not reached out, in any serious way, to early-state operatives. Phones in New Hampshire and Iowa are cold. The buzz in Jersey and inside the Beltway may be hot, but elsewhere, it seems that no one is working on jump-starting a Christie campaign on the ground. Tim Albrecht, a spokesman for Iowa governor Terry Branstad, tells the Star Ledger that “it’s been radio silent.” South Carolina consultants tell me the same.
As the clock ticks, and with all signs pointing toward “no,” Christie sources point me to 2004, when Christie, then United States attorney, mulled a gubernatorial run. With Democrats reeling following the resignation of Gov. Jim McGreevey, Christie was seriously courted. But around Thanksgiving 2004, months before the 2005 primary, he decided against it. He weighed his options, didn’t see a clear path, and didn’t feel ready. In many ways, his friends say, 2011 feels a lot like 2004: There’s an appetite for a Christie candidacy, but Christie, it seems, is simply not ready to pull the trigger, and will keep his eye on the future.
Ah, shucks, it was fun while it lasted.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseOne of the reasons Christie chose not to run for governor in 2005 was that he "couldn't see a clear path." Maybe the clear path he doesn't see for his presidency is because the path is already cluttered with Tea Party overseers.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"Sources: Christie's Out."
He was never "in," and yet all these Beltway types just refused to accept his repeated statements that he had no interest in running, constantly citing anonymous "sources" that there was a chance he'd change his mind, seemingly blind to the notion that if he did so he would destroy his image as a straight talking guy who told you, whether you agreed with him or not, where he stood.
I believe the term for this condition is "wish-casting."
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseMario Cuomo Christie, s--- or get off the pot.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseYou make the point of how electable a poorly thought out, self-serving bubble head like our current POTUS really is. And your way of phrasing is nothing short of what one might expect from a lack of depthful thought. Welcome to Obamaville...Enjoy your stay.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseGood. Done. Now let the guy get back to his pastries and running a complicated northern state.
Actually, the Governor burnishes his credentials by staying on station and completing a successful term as governor - what a concept! Every indication is that he treats his office as a primary task (hello... Gov Perry and Rep Bachmann).
And, to those of us for whom the Governor holds immense potential as a future prospect for POTUS, there is the satisfaction of knowing he is out there, wise enough to anticipate his moment, and discerning enough to understand that this is not it.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe quote** by Gov. Christie is similar to those historical sentiments of St. Sir Thomas More, Martyr and Defender of the Faith. Against all the the pressures, even by the archbishop, Sir Thomas refused to pass forward the dissolution of marriage petition to pressure the Bishop of Rome for Henry the VIII to divorce his brother's widow (Catherine), and marry Ann Bolyn.
The similarities are striking. Christie cites, as did St. Thomas a moral compass that is easily lost, or in the case of our current POTUS possiblly non-existent entirely.
NJ's First Son is a credit to honorable service in the face of the power and self-serving gratifications we frequently see--with just a little chipping away of that moral conscience.
Gov. Christie has come full circle. He said "No." in the beginning, endured an every louder clammoring for his change of mind---briefly considered that opportunity only to return to his own moral compass.
**“You can become intoxicated by that smoke, ...And you can wind up, as the smoke gets thicker and thicker, losing your way. Losing that inner compass that we all hope remains true to who we are and what our role is in whatever position or authority we hold.”
Governor, YOU ARE OUR LOSS---all the more so your process of decision making. We will see you again.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse...as Romney breaths a sigh of relief.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseL-O-L!! I wish i had your brievity!! It took me hundreds of years of comparison to cite the obviousness of what you posted in 6 words!! very sincerely & gratefully, mb.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIf Christie (along with Daniels, Ryan (arguably) et. al) couldn't get it together to run in this environment, he and the rest of them can kiss goodbye any chance of a presidential future after this. The GOP has great prospects in the pipeline for 2016 or 2020 - Martinez, Jindal, Rubio, etc. - and these guys - that didn't have the fortitude to spend even a couple of months meeting their patriotic duty - will deservedly be a bunch of has beens.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"...that didn't have the fortitude to spend even a couple of months meeting their patriotic duty..."
Huh? Christie, Daniels, etc. didn't feel inclined to enter the race, yet should have done it for..."patriotic duty"?
So tossing your life into the media meat grinder for "a couple of months" is now a requirement for acceptable citizenship in the GOP hierarchy?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseNo wonder it's called "The Stupid Party."
Like all the other blue-chippers, Christie's not running because he knows that, no matter who's in office in 2013, the country's shot. Why take the blame for something he can't control?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseGov. Christie, thank you for reminding us what a an unyielding 'moral compass' looks like. We'll be seeing you in the future.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abusebill kristol, ann coulter hardest hit.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI'm happy he's staying put. He'd have been roughhoused for not being conservative enough for the national GOP, which he isn't. Had he won, his candidacy would only wake up Big Labor, which is almost set now to go to sleep through this campaign after its Waterloo In Wisconsin.
Dollars to doughnuts if Rick Perry had to decide all over again, he'd decide to sit put, too.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse