The Senate has failed to invoke cloture on President Obama’s jobs bill, falling well short of the 60 vote requirement. The count currently stands at 50-48 in favor, though the vote will open remain for several more hours to allow Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D., N.H.) to fly back from Boston after attending an award ceremony there. Shaheen has indicated that she will vote yes, which would just barely give Democrats the simply majority they were hoping for.
Sen. Tom Coburn (R., Okla.) did not vote, as he is currently recovering from surgery for early-stage prostate cancer. The remaining 46 Republicans voted no, along with Sens. Ben Nelson (D., Neb.) and Jon Tester (D., Mont.), who called the president’s plan “an expensive, temporary fix to a problem that needs a big, long-term solution.” Both senators are facing difficult reelections in 2012.
The presumed final vote count of 51-48 is misleading, however, as a number Democratic (or Democrat-aligned) Senators, such as Joe Lieberman (I., Ct.), Joe Manchin (D., W.Va.) and Jim Webb (D., Va.), voted for cloture despite their overriding opposition to the president’s plan. All three said they would not have supported final passage of the bill in its current form.
[Seinfeld voice]: That's a shame.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseLieberman plays this BS game all the time. He acts like a reasonable guy, excoriating Dems as extreme, then votes with them anyway. He always does this. It was especially galling with the Clinton impeachment conviction vote. He never let a day go by saying Clinton was a bad man, and that he, Joe, was very devout, and couldn't stand all the lying.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseExcept he voted to aquit, and never explained why. For all his devoutness, he's just a scummy pol. I'm sick of his BS. Retire, already!
That's because it wasn't a jobs bill and even the democrats know it.
It was a buy the union vote.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe GOP missed an opportunity here. McConnell should have designated ten Republican senators -- or even more -- to invoke cloture. Then Webb, Lieberman, Tester, et. al. vote against and kill the thing outright. Best part: no risk if the off-the-reservation Dems flip-flop and it passes, because it's never getting throught the House anyway. Idiot Reid hung a curveball over the fat of the plate and the Reps stood there looking at it. How would Obama's grand re-election strategy have recovered from his own party refusing to "pass this bill now?"
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI don't know...I could go either way on this one. I think Reid would have loaded up the bill with pork and more taxes to appease the "moderate" Democrats who said they oppose the bill in its current form. Then it passes, and we get to have the House (which brought us the 2011 budget and debt ceiling debacles) under Obama's thumb.
Saw on Fox tonight that now Obama is talking about breaking the bill up into pieces. GOP Wins. Obama looks like a moron for not just doing this from the start and wasting everyone's time for the last 7 weeks.
Fail.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseYou are taking a big risk there, hoping one or two guys have the principled stance and do actually vote against the caucus. Reid would work those guys hard until he bribed them so much they couldn't refuse.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAgreed. Tooooo big a risk. Reid will twist & break arms to get his way.
Obama does not really gain much by the failure to pass his bill.
Republicans only need to point out that the last scamulus bill cost Americans millions of jobs.
SO, the Republicans saved millions of jobs by NOT passing another scamulus.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI agree, but lack of imagination seems to be a hallmark of Senate Republicans and their leadership. Perhaps Reid could have pulled a rabbit out of his hat and passed the bill, but at the cost of exposing so-called moderate Democrats to be the hypocrites they surely are. More likely the whole thing would have been killed by a majority vote and Obama and Reid would have lots of egg on their faces.
By the same token, Republicans have stupidly left themselves exposed as seemingly being defenders of the wealthy, when many of said wealthy are their political enemies and have heavily funded Obama and Co. Why not support a temporary tax on the super rich, structured to catch the Hollywood and Wall Street liberal elite? Of course it won't help the economy (good, for now!) and would be repealed immediately under a Republican administration after it had been shown to be a jobs killer and a counterproductive tax measure raising revenue. But in the meantime Republicans would defang the spurious claim that they are the defenders of the wealthy and well connected.
Just thinking out of the Republican box.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseCompletely and absolutely agree. Get the thing to the floor and force a vote on it. Every mainstream outlet is now reporting that the Repubs killed the bill. Should have brought it to vote knowing it would fail and had the House as a backstop anyway if the ball somehow got by. How could the Repubs have been so blind on this? Am I missing something?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseCan we please stop calling Joe Lieberman a moderate!! He votes down the line liberal unless it's something about Israel/National Security. His votes allowed passage of Obamacare and the first Obama Stimulus, and now his voting for stimulus part 2!
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseLet me get this straight...Congress approved $1 billion to kill 1 old man in AFRICA-whose own people were going to kill him soon anyway-but voted down a bill that would have saved 400,000 AMERICAN teachers, firefighters, and police officers from losing their jobs. Did I mention the jobs are HERE?......In AMERICA? Morons.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse