Sen. Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.), the Democrats’ chief political messenger, is up to old tricks. In a memo to his Democratic colleagues, Schumer lays out his preferred strategy of blaming “Tea Party Republicans” for the sorry state of the economy. In this case, Schumer argues, Democrats should blame the “extreme” GOP opposition to the President Obama’s jobs bill (defeated last night in the Senate) for putting the economy at risk. As the debate over jobs moves forward, he writes, “the Tea Party’s growing unpopularity has the potential to be the GOP’s Achilles’ Heel.”
Recent polling appears to confirm Schumer’s claim that the Tea Party’s popularity is waning. A CNN poll in late September found just 28 percent of respondents had a favorable opinion of the Tea Party movement, while 53 percent had an unfavorable view, signaling a steady decline over the past year. Schumer is hoping to capitalized on this perceived weakness.
“With the economy at a crossroads, the GOP’s current political strategy — block anything that could improve the economy, lest it boost the President’s standing — has the potential to backfire,” Schumer writes. “By linking the GOP to its extreme Tea Party fringe, Democrats can bolster the prospects for the President’s jobs ideas, or at least make clear who is responsible for the stalling of the recovery.”
He goes on to coin a number of new terms that you can expect to hear parroted ad nauseam by Democrats and other liberal talking heads in the coming weeks and months: “Democrats can make this link by branding the school of thought that resists against any job-creation measures as ‘Tea Party economics.’ The opponents of the President’s jobs proposals should be invoked as ‘Tea Party Republicans.’ If their obstruction continues, it will risk a ‘Tea Party recession.’”
At the same time, Senate Democrats will seek to advance the president’s plan “one plank at a time.” As they do, Schumer argues, “it will only get harder for Republicans to sustain their blanket opposition to the President’s policies.”
Schumer’s strategy is to essentially to get Senate Democrats in line with the Obama administration campaign, seeking to pin the blame for the poor economy on Republicans, despite the fact that they control only one house of Congress. It may be a tough sell, however, as a number of Senate Democrats, particularly those up for reelection in 2012, have also expressed opposition to the president’s plan, which failed on a cloture motion last night in the Senate, 50–49 . However, taking into account the three Democrats (Lieberman, Manchin, and Webb) who voted for cloture but said they could not support passage of the bill in its current form, and the absence of Sen. Tom Coburn (R., Okla), who is recovering from prostate surgery, a more accurate reflection of the Senate’s support would be 47–53. The president likes to claim that his jobs plan is full of bipartisan ideas, but at the point the only thing bipartisan about it is the opposition.
Schumer, though, is apparently convinced this is a winning strategy, telling reporters this morning that it is “almost impossible” that Democrats will lose the Senate in 2012.
UPDATE: You might be surprised to hear that, according to Schumer, Democrats do not control the Senate. Ezra Klein reports:
A reporter asked Schumer why voters were supposed to blame Republicans for economic outcomes when Democrats control the White House and the Senate. “We don’t control the Senate,” Schumer shot back. “You write that and it’s false.”
Schumer is the shadow president. He is not winner but a wiener.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseNo, he's a Whiner.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSchumer is a political hack, but where are the Republicans plotting their counter strategy. Does anybody remember the Bush years and the deafening silence from the Republicans. The media is telling us what they are planning, get busy and be just as ruthless as those nitwits. I'm sick of being the party that always turns the other cheek, that plan does not work now.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSo scared of Chuck Schumer. How did that strategy work in NY 9? Our side gets so freaked out about skewed msm polls. How many seats are the Democrats defending in 2012? If the Republicans win the White House they will win the Senate.
More people hate Obama than we New Jerseyans hated Corzine. All his money and dirty tricks couldn't help and they wont help Obama either
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWhy does Sen Schumer hate bipartisanship?
The Obama Bill went down to a bipartisan vote after all. Why must he castigate his fellow Democrats for being bipartisan?
Does anyone else think he's angling for Vinzini if they remake The Princess Bride?
"I'm trying to start a class war. It's an ancient profession, with a long and noble history."
"Lose the senate in 2012? Inconceivable!"
"We are but 50 poor Senators, out for a stroll..."
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI hope Schumer is wrong on the Senate. It would be nice to see him eat some crow. Of course, being Chuckie Schumer is never having to say you were wrong.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSchumer is one of my two senators and more of an old lady than the other.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSadly it will work because the media will play along. Look no further than the difference in coverage between the OWS and Tea Party protests for evidence.
A perfect example came from last night's NBC4 11pm News in DC where Jim Vance declared that the Obama Jobs Bill was "blocked by Republicans" No matter that they are in the minority and cannot accomplish anything without cooperation from democrats - it was the Republicans that blocked it, case closed.
Extrapolate that approach out over the next 11 months...The left will try to blame the Tea Party for the entire economic crisis and the media will pass that along without comment or critique.
Consider the fact that a recent poll reported that 51% of those polled felt that Obama didn't deserve to be re-elected. That means at least 49% either think he SHOULD be or aren't sure yet. Good lord - if that's the headwind the eventual Republican nominee is flying into then we are doomed...
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIt's ludicrous that the party in power could so blatantly seek to avoid accountability for the economy under their watch.
But if the Tea Party is to "blame" for raising concerns about the government's out of control spending, so be it.
The Democrats were never really for cutting spending (except for defense) or even spending wisely (I originally wrote "more wisely").
The Democrats' excuse that now is a bad time to reduce government overspending is like an overweight man complaining that now is a bad time to cut back on what he eats because he's hungry.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseDoes this mean we can actually implement some Tea Party (i.e., market-based, limited-government) public policies?
Because unless we are allowed to do that it's a little hard to, y'know, blame us for the damage caused by statism.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIt wont work. The MSM is no where the power they were even 5 years ago. In the NY market, the Post has crucified the protesters. If the MSM was so powerful 201o would have never happened.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseOr NY-9
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"Democrats can make this link by branding the school of thought that resists against any job-creation measures as ‘Tea Party economics'."
It's reassuring to know we still produce such keen minds.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseOf course, Sen Schumer is talking pure spin and election year strawmen. The Tea Party's only ability is to thwart the agenda of Obama and his Democratic allies. And if that's the case, the majority of voters owe the Tea Party a big thank you.
What is so absurd about Schumer is that he was a key player early on in assuring Obama's Stimulus Jr goes down in flames. The President's proposed tax plan (which was the key feature of the Stimulus or Jobs Bill) would have hit New Yorkers very hard. So, Schumer and his pals in the Senate kill the bill, blame it on the House Tea Party (which never voted on it), and hopes that the narrative sticks. Good luck with that.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseYes, the Tea Party's "only" ability is to prevent any effective action to combat the current depression/recession.
Thank goodness for that! We wouldn't want to live in a more prosperous country.
The unemployed should know they have the Tea Party Politicians and Republican Politicians to thank.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI take it you are under the mistaken impression that the president's plan was designed to help the economy.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI believe that 'effective action' does not mean what you think it means.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseLike Chucky Schumer, David likes to ignore that the two Obamabudgets have been shot down in bipartisan efforts.
I don't know why David hates Bipartisan action.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseDavid,
The Dems had a full year with a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate. They had a chance to lead the country back to prosperity. They failed, which is why they got smoked in the 2010 election. In that election the people of this country said very clearly they weren't buying what the Dems were selling. The tea party Republicans are just doing what they were asked to do by the electorate.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThis would be relatively to counter if the GOP in Congress would simply put forth a number of Job Proposals which the Obamacrats would obstruct.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse