Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

March 5 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Corner

The one and only.

Print   |  Text
 

Don’t Occupy Education?

The number of people participating in the Occupy Wall Street sit-ins because they are angry that their education has not yielded the fruits that they hoped it would becomes more apparent by the day. Many of the protesters I have met are understandably ruffled that they are unemployed, and they often finish their remonstrations with a non-sequitur, delivered as if it were a knockout blow: “And I went to college!” Well, one might ask, “So what?” 

I first noticed this “college = good life” fallacy back in England. A close friend of mine was looking for a job straight out of college, and remained unemployed for six months while he searched for what he described as a “graduate job.” Outside of those careers that rely on specific skills and expertise — doctors, veterinarians, and so forth — I have never been sure quite what this term means. My friend has a degree in modern history. Congratulations! But there is no obvious career path for this qualification. Why should it lend itself more to working in, say, finance than to working in a 7-Eleven? Compare this attitude to that exhibited by another friend of mine — a recently naturalized American citizen. After her parents escaped from the Soviet Union in the mid-1980s and fled to the United States, her engineer father worked as a garbageman for five years until he found a job which tallied more closely with his abilities. At no point did he complain. Was it a waste of talent? Undoubtedly. Did he have a right to a “post-graduate job”? No. That’s just not how free economies work. 

Yet you would not know this from the prevailing attitude. Each year in Britain, scores of intellectually average people graduate from intellectually average institutions for no better reason than that they think they should. Emerging from graduation ceremonies, they proudly wave an expensive piece of paper above their heads, which in many cases is worth little more than the Munich Agreement. And months later, when the euphoria abates, they wonder out loud why they are no more employable than before. Given the promises of milk and honey that have been made to them, this is apprehensible. But those promises have always been laughably misguided. The late Labour government’s promise to send 50 percent of British children to college is based upon a staggering failure of logic, which has not yet been exploded. It was, until a few years ago, possible to draw a direct line between the possession of a university degree, and a better paying job. This was not the product of a timeless ironclad equation, but because the default was not to go to university; to have a degree thus set one apart from the crowd. But if everyone has a degree, then nobody does. We are now caught in a spiral in which a master’s is the new degree and, soon, a Ph.D. will be the new master’s. Would that economics classes had given our children an understanding of the importance of adding value. You don’t pay your plumber more because he has a degree in physics.

In the West, we are hard at work establishing a culture that fetishizes education, and instills the belief that college — regardless of its content or application — will, and should, inexorably lead to a better job, or a better life, or even a better America. Worse, that one has a right to these things. In doing so, we have created a Potemkin aristocracy, one based upon the erroneous and tragic conceit that having letters after one’s name intrinsically confers excellence. We are happily encouraging our children to join its ranks, regardless of whether there is any evidence that to do so will be in their interest. This is supremely ironic, given that so many of America’s billionaires — i.e. those who pay for more educations and create more jobs than anyone else — are college dropouts. Indeed, both Steve Jobs and Bill Gates failed to finish college. Can we say with a straight face that this has adversely affected them, or America at large?

On Thursday, I met a guy down in Zuccotti Park. He speaks six languages, but he has nothing useful to say in any of them. He is the movement’s perfect spokesman.

New on The Corner. . .


COMMENTS   88

EXPAND  

   10/17/11 13:26

"In doing so, we have created a Potemkin aristocracy, one based upon the erroneous and tragic conceit that having letters after one’s name intrinsically confers excellence."

This isn't a complete explanation of how the current president got himself elected, but it's an essential part. A pedigree that included Columbia and Harvard Law was a guarantee of basic competence to many people.

In a better world, people would *accuse* other people of being Ivy League grads.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/17/11 14:10

"A pedigree that included Columbia and Harvard Law was a guarantee of basic competence to many people."

But what amazes me is how many of the same people keep insisting that GWB, educated at both Yale and Harvard, is stupid.
Either it means something or it doesn't, but for goodness' sake be consistent!
(I originally tried to make this point during the Bush v Gore campaign. Two young men, similar backgrounds, similar universities, both legacies -- and the one who finished the postgrad degree just had to be an idiot, while the one who dropped out of grad school was assumed to be intelligent ... HUH??)

But if you have the credentials AND project the impression that you believe yourself of superior intelligence, THAT is the winning recipe. Or at any rate the Gore, Kerry, Obama recipe -- which eventually won.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/18/11 07:54

On top of all that, Bush actually got better grades than Gore, yet Gore was still touted as smarter. The formula is simple: agree with the Left and you are smart. Disagree and you are stupid. That's why the OWS buffoons are convinced that Americans are idiots, because most regular people want jobs and quiet lives, not revolution.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/17/11 13:32

I find it hard to gain apprehension of anyone who
can speak six languages being unemployed. The ability to
speak six languages is categorically different from having
a useless degree in ism studies or studies studies or
even modern history. Are you sure he isn't failing in
his aspiration to be a post modern documentary film maker.
I understand there is a labor glut amongst such peoples in
The Apple.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
DavidinTexas
   10/17/11 13:52

Does Mr. Cook speak six languages? If so, are they the same six the man he mentions speaks? If the answer to either is no, Mr. Cook is simply embellishing for the sake of a good story. This is a big problem with journalism and detracts from the blog.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/17/11 14:09

C/mon - he's not embellishing - he's just not putting in obvious qualifiers since this is a blog.

"I met a guy who claimed to speak six languages. This claim remains unverified. However, judging by what he said in English, he had nothing useful to say in any of them."

Better?

I too believe that that guy will probably be able to find a job more easily than some majors.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/17/11 14:15

Where does it say that the guy with six languages is unemployed?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
 JEM
   10/17/11 14:59

Probably because he chose to use it in a way where no one needed it. If it is in somthing applicable - languages in say spanish, portugese, mandarin, etc, after he gets over feeling sorry for himself, my guess is he could do something with that skill.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
DavidinTexas
   10/17/11 17:10

I don't think your qualifiers are obvious. Even in a blog, clarity/veracity is important. If your assumptions are correct, your sentence would be considerably more exact and honest than Mr. Cooke's.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/17/11 13:35

"I first noticed this “college = good life” fallacy back in England."

-nah, "College=You Owe Me".

Supply and demand- if everyone has a college degree, uh...

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
dan k
   10/17/11 13:49

It all depends on what you think a college degree is supposed to represent. If it narrowly represents the proof that the graduate has mastered particular skills that are useful for a particular profession, that's one thing. If, however, you admit that any rigorous undergraduate program is a test of a person's intelligence, ambition, resolve, and energy, then you understand why a graduate of such a program would be less than eager to work at 7-Eleven. Employers who pay decent money, after all, aren't purely interested in particular skills (most of which are honed in the workplace much more than in the classroom), but are looking for people who are smart, energetic, ambitious, tenacious, etc., and they use college degrees and transcripts (from reputable schools) as a way of uncovering these traits - regardless of subjects studied.

Yours is a simple-minded critique of the college graduate with high expectations. True, some people skate through college, earning a degree in some liberal-arts subject without much effort, but that fact should not be used to impugn all college graduates - even those who majored in History.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
johnnybravo
   10/17/11 13:53

My first computing job was in academia, a medical school where even the secretaries put "B.A." after their names. That was twenty years ago, and I still get a good laugh out of it.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
drk
   10/17/11 13:55

It's ironic: I went into university PR because I believed in the mission. Early in my career, I had been badly burned shilling for a crooked S&L that went belly up and destroyed who knows how many people's savings?

Promoting universities, thought I, would never land me in such a moral quagmire. Ha!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/17/11 13:56

As a hiring manager, I would be willing to take a *chance* on a new liberal arts graduate as a 7-11 management trainee. I would immediately put the person on the night shift for three months to make sure he was serious about pursuing a career at my company. Down the line a ways, a college degree and five years of retail management experience is an *excellent* resume with lots of career options. I'm not sure what to make of these strange college graduates you unearth here, because the career path I have just outlined doesn't take a lot intellectual horsepower to analyze.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/17/11 14:12

I think it's less because they can't analyze it and more they think it's beneath them.

After I got laid off in 2001 from an IT job I spent much of the next few years working up from driver to manager at a Dominos with an eye to franchising (I later decided that wasn't the path for me).

I can't tell you the number of friends who wondered why I was wasting my life just making pizzas. After all, I went to college.

Mike Rowe, of Dirty Jobs, has a great TED talk about how as a culture we have devalued work (External Link ).

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/17/11 14:24

Same thing with me: from the law, back to the hospitality industry (where I worked in high school and college) for a number of years, with my coworkers wondering what was wrong with me.

As a result of the experience, I contemplated a career in the hospitality industry. But why it was ever considered "crazy" to keep my stomach full w/out any benefits is beyond me.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/17/11 14:30

I remember seeing that Mike Rowe talk a year or so ago and instantly my respect for him doubled.

I dropped out of college during my sophomore year because I wanted to work. Sitting through English, History, etc. was pointless in the eyes of this 20 year old. So if college wasn't going to teach me, I wanted to be out in the real world finding my own way. After over year of driving an 18-wheeler (at 21 years old), I found my way into a niche IT job that has treated me pretty well. It's not what I wanted to do for a living, but my focus was finding a niche that would insure some job stability.

College graduates today act like the hard work is over when they graduate. They don't seem to realize that the work only gets harder, and they aren't prepared to do whatever it takes to make a living.

Sad.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/17/11 13:59

I think that another aspect, at least from an employer standpoint, is that possession of a high school diploma conveys approximately nothing about the preparedness of the graduate. Employers then began insisting on college degrees, which offered some assurance that the prospective employee could communicate effectively and do basic math, and provided some defense to discrimination litigation. Also, a college degree presumed that the applicant had some degree of self-motivation. Now, of course, some colleges provide no additional educational benefit, and employers no longer trust the signalling aspects of an undergraduate degree.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/17/11 14:47

Ten years ago, when I was in a hiring position, we would reject any resume from a California public high school graduate. Without at least a BA they were unable to string together two sentences.

I recall reading that something like 1/3 of freshman here in CA state schools need remedial math and english to catch up.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
CarolM
   10/17/11 15:32

I thought all this entry-level credentialism came about because employers could no longer give IQ tests to applicants (Greggs v. Duke Power).

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Load More Comments

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact