In case you haven’t figured it out by now, what’s going on in Washington and across the country is the Full Alinsky, brought to you by the same malcontents who have been awaiting this moment for more than 40 years. It’s been a long time wandering in the desert for the Sixties Left, but this is their moment, this is their time, as somebody or other from Punahou once said.
The Great Man himself was already there, agitating and “organizing” for two years by the time I got to Rochester, N.Y., in the fall of 1967 to attend the Eastman School of Music. His target was the Eastman Kodak Co., and his human battering rams were members of the city’s black community, which had exploded in a riot in 1964. In the wake of the unrest, Rochester was already visibly on the slide when Alinsky got there, whipsawing both the black neighborhoods (which had largely been the old Jewish neighborhoods) and the useful idiots of the Rochester Area Council of Churches to hack away at the city’s then-prosperous business community and its WASPy leadership.
Alinsky rode into town on a one-trick pony that the Left has since turned into its warhorse: Agitate one side’s grievances, and appeal to another side’s decency and gullibility in order to provoke the establishment, whose reaction will unite the other two. Then the community organizer charges in on his nag-turned-steed and proceeds to set the rot in motion under the banner of “progress.”
It is the very devil’s work, and Alinsky certainly made a splendid devil: unctuous and whiny at the same time, and always casting himself as the real, heroic victim standing for progress, when in fact he was a particularly nasty, cowardly kind of cultural vandal. Here he is, talking to Playboy about his days in Rochester:
ALINSKY: In the aftermath of the riots, the Rochester Area Council of Churches, a predominantly white body of liberal clergymen, invited us in to organize the black community and agreed to pay all our expenses. We said they didn’t speak for the blacks and we wouldn’t come in unless we were invited in by the black community itself. At first, there seemed little interest in the ghetto, but once again the old reliable establishment came to the rescue and, by overreacting, cut its own throat. The minute the invitation was made public, the town’s power structure exploded in paroxysms of rage. The mayor joined the city’s two newspapers, both part of the conservative Gannett chain, in denouncing me as a subversive hatemonger; radio station WHAM delivered one-minute editorial tirades against me and told the ministers who’d invited me that from now on they’d have to pay for their previously free Sunday-morning air time. A settlement house that had pledged its support to us was promptly informed by the Community Chest that its funds would be cut off if it went ahead; the board retracted its support, with several members resigning. The establishment acted as if the Golden Horde of Genghis Khan was camped on its doorstep.
If you listened to the public comments, you’d have thought I spent my spare time feeding poisoned Milk-Bones to seeing-eye dogs. It was the nicest thing they could have done for me, of course. Overnight, the black community broke out of its apathy and started clamoring for us to come in; as one black told me later, “I just wanted to see somebody who could freak those mothers out like that.” Black civil rights leaders, local block organizations and ministers plus 13,000 individuals signed petitions asking me to come in, and with that kind of support I knew we were rolling. I assigned my associate, Ed Chambers, as chief organizer in Rochester, and prepared to visit the city myself once his efforts were under way.
PLAYBOY: Was your reception as hostile as your advance publicity?
ALINSKY: Oh, yeah, I wasn’t disappointed. I think they would have quarantined me at the airport if they could have. When I got off the plane, a bunch of local reporters were waiting for me, keeping the same distance as tourists in a leper colony. I remember one of them asking me what right I had to start “meddling” in the black community after everything Kodak had done for “them” and I replied: “Maybe I’m uninformed, but as far as I know the only thing Kodak has done on the race issue in America is to introduce color film.” My relationship with Kodak was to remain on that plane.
Most of this is self-aggrandizing hokum, of course, designed to stick a papier-mache halo atop Old Nick’s horns. The Gannett Rochester Newspapers — the Rochester Democrat and Chronicle, for which I worked as a police reporter, federal-court reporter, and classical-music critic from 1972 to 1977, and the Times-Union — were harmless, inoffensive white-guy, country-club publications. They did some excellent journalism (the T-U won a Pulitzer in 1972 for its coverage of the Attica prison riots), and a whole bunch of folks graduated from Rochester and went on to great things. The notion that Rochester reporters would treat Alinsky like a leper is a typical leftist mendacity.
Setting the template, Alinsky “organized” a front group called FIGHT (the martial imagery so beloved of the peaceful and tolerant Left always makes me laugh) — Freedom, Integration, God, Honor, Today — and then induced guilt-ridden white liberals to join the “Friends of FIGHT” to finance the scam; the reference to “God,” coming from the man who in part dedicated Rules for Radicals to Lucifer, was a nice touch.
But the key to Alinskyism is the whipsaw, a constantly shifting “moral center” that can argue both sides of an issue at the same time. Thus Alinsky’s love child, Barack Obama, can boast of being rich and siding with the “99%” simultaneously; attack him as one and he’ll say he’s “really” the other. Just look what the Obama administration is doing now, claiming to suspend the “CLASS” act of Obamacare while the president swears to defend it. Intellectually absurd — but emotionally pitch-perfect: Barry as the eternal outsider, battling dark forces inimical. For Alinsky always needs a villain, even if the villain is Alinskyism itself. But what do you expect from a political philosophy that claims up is really down, in is really out, and black is really white?
Alinskyism forces the Right to always be on defense, shadow-boxing in a hall of mirrors against a foe whose moral turpitude it refuses to credit. If Alinsky stood for anything, it was, like Lucifer, destruction; the Left’s rage is animated by its lust for demolition, and the sooner the Right stops accepting its pretensions, the quicker the real battle can finally be engaged.
Take Rochester today. Once a glorious monument to hard work and creativity, the city that gave the world Kodak, Xerox, Bausch and Lomb, Ragu spaghetti sauce, Susan B. Anthony, Frederick Douglass, George Eastman, the country’s best pizza, Genny Cream, and Nick Tahou’s garbage plate is just another post-Alinsky ruin, shorn of its heritage and condemned by its weather. If you want to see the future of America under the shade of Saul Alinsky, Rochester is a good place to start.
As for Alinsky, somebody should turn the tables, and instruct the Right how to use his principles against him. It’s the only way to beat his ghost — and his hate-filled love children.
what is it with the right and their obsession with Alinsky? Nobody on the left even talks about this guy but listening to the right you would think he is down at Zuccati Park leading the protestors. And how about this ridiculous comment by the author, "
"brought to you by the same malcontents who have been awaiting this moment for more than 40 years. It’s been a long time wandering in the desert for the Sixties Left, but this is their moment"
Really. I would venture to say that the vast majority of those in the OWS movement weren't even born during the sixties.
The right is really getting completely unhinged by the effectiveness of the protests. They are spreading all over the country. Poll after poll shows that the American public agree with the sentiments of the protests. I know that scares the heck out of the right and those whose pocket they are firmly in - the 1%.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAfter Obama I suddenly had a "Cadillac Health Plan"; prior, it was good insurance.
Alinsky.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseQuit your whining.
All fronts of the battle can and will be opened. The idea isn't to beat the leftist morons, it is to squash them like a grape beneath the wheel of a shopping cart.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseNope - the smell is coming off the rose and what is left is the stupidity for all to see. The more the public knows - the more they dislike, the Hill poll being just the latest.
I hope this keeps going until the election - no better advertising for the conservatives than the silliness of OWS. I love it when the left actually campaigns on what it believes. Please - keep going OWS!!
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"The right is really getting completely unhinged by the effectiveness of the protests."
By all means, please identify what "effectiveness" these protests have had in any way, shape or form.
Have they gotten publicity? Sure, just like every other extended public leftist demonstrations have in the past. Have they changed Democrat policy? Any policy?
I'm sure you'll say they've "changed attitudes or something" however, I'm pretty sure if you go back and look at much poling prior to these events an awful lot of people thought "the banks" or "Wall Street" were culpable (in some manner) for the financial debacle. Do some people have "higher awareness" of this point? Yeah, sure.
So what's really been accomplished?
Oh, and please reconsider the notion that giving opinions of an event at a conservative (or any other) site constitute becoming "unhinged". I'm sure you'd love to project that outcome but its as likely as these demonstrators "goals" being fulfilled. And those goals would be what, again?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSlide writes, about Alinsky, "Nobody on the left even talks about this guy."
That's correct, but Jonah Goldberg has correctly pointed out that the Left isn't very interested in discussing the roots of their beliefs and tactics -- or what political thinkers DO animate these protesters?
It sure as hell ain't Smith, Burke, Locke, Jefferson, Madison, Hayek, and Friedman.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSimilarly, I'm sure most leftists haven't read Marx but they are informed by those who did.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseYup, but not only Marx and his acolytes Lenin and Mao, but the roots go further back, at least to Rousseau. Most Leftists don't realize the lineage of their immoral ideas, but the orphaned ideas still bear the family resemblence.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"the Left isn't very interested in discussing the roots of their beliefs and tactics "
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThat's because the Left is as stupid and ignorant as it looks. And "Slide" is merely making explicit what we already know, i.e. that they have no idea why they believe what they believe, to the extent that the mush in their skulls amounts to something worthy of the label, "belief."
"what is it with the right and their obsession with Alinsky? Nobody on the left even talks about this guy . . . "
The lefties you and I know are entirely uneducated. They fail basic American and European history. There is very little chance they would know Alinsky's name.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe useful idiots (most protesters) have never heard of Alinsky, but the people manipulating them are well schooled in Alinsky tactics.
That includes the SEIU, the Soros organizations, Communists, Socialists, and professional protesters. They idiots are programmed to follow the meme which is at the moment "millionaires and corporations and banks are bad".
They have no idea that it is our huge government bureaucracy, the White House and Socialist-Democrats in Washington who have created our jobless economy.
The idiot graduates complaining about their student loans should be complaining to the colleges and universities who have screwed them, and the easy "student loans" which have endentured them to the government for life.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSo tell me, Slide: if the organizers of these protests WERE toting around pocket-sized Rules for Radicals, why would that be bad?
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"Fisking Alinsky," a nine-part series:
External Link
So you don't have to!
CAPTCHA: sick puppy
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseOh please, sounds like there's plenty of hate-filling to go around. At least choose a better known bogeyman if you want to paint with such a broad brush.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAlinsky will do.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWe can crunch all we want because we know you'll make more.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWhy does it matter? You guys are going to whine and simper no matter which of your heroes is accurately portrayed.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseFollow the money. Can YOU take four weeks out of work to 'occupy' anything? These children look too wed-fed, too well-dressed to be simply street urchins. We must ask: Who is funding this astroturf to the tune of hundreds of millions? Big money, big problems, this is grassroots nothing, this is outside influences trying to sway an American election, and Øbambi is embracing it.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseJust think, Michael -- if it wasn't for all that Alinskyite meddling, Rochester would still be making Kodachrome and slide projectors, and we'd still be drinking the beer we found sweet and creamy enough to bring to high school weekend house parties.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThis is a clear indication that MikeB cannot defend the actions of Alinski. So rather than offer something of value we are treated to the left's favorite non verbal expression: The sneer.
If that's the best the left has, and it seems that way on many days lately, we conservatives have made substantial progress
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse