Mitt Romney’s statement:
President Obama’s astonishing failure to secure an orderly transition in Iraq has unnecessarily put at risk the victories that were won through the blood and sacrifice of thousands of American men and women. The unavoidable question is whether this decision is the result of a naked political calculation or simply sheer ineptitude in negotiations with the Iraqi government. The American people deserve to hear the recommendations that were made by our military commanders in Iraq.
Michele Bachmann’s statement:
Today’s announcement that we will remove all of our forces from Iraq is a political decision and not a military one; it represents the complete failure of President Obama to secure an agreement with Iraq for our troops to remain there to preserve the peace and demonstrates how far our foreign policy leadership has fallen. In every case where the United States has liberated a people from dictatorial rule, we have kept troops in that country to ensure a peaceful transition and to protect fragile growing democracies. We will now have fewer troops in Iraq than we have in Honduras – despite a costly and protracted war.
President Obama’s decision represents the end of the era of America’s influence in Iraq and the strengthening of Iran’s influence in Iraq with no plan to counter that influence. We have been ejected from a country by the people that we liberated and that the United States paid for with precious blood and treasure. The administration claims that we got exactly what we needed, but today’s announcement demonstrates otherwise. The United States needed a working democratic partnership in Iraq and we should have demanded that Iraq repay the full cost of liberating them given their rich oil revenues. I call on the president to return to the negotiating table with Iraq and lead from the front and not from weakness in Iraq and in the world.
UPDATE: Jon Huntsman’s and Rick Perry’s statements below the jump.
Jon Huntsman’s statement:
On the occasion of the announcement that U.S. forces will withdraw completely from Iraq by the end of the year, we should take a moment to reflect on the service and sacrifice of our brave men and women in uniform. We are forever grateful for their service to America, and are eager to welcome our troops home.
President Obama’s decision, however, to not leave a small, focused presence in Iraq is a mistake and the product of his administration’s failures. The president’s inability to reach a security agreement leaves Iraq vulnerable to backsliding, thus putting our interests in the region at risk. An ideal arrangement would have left a small troop presence that could have assisted with the training of Iraqi security forces and vital counter-terror efforts.
Rick Perry’s statement:
I’m deeply concerned that President Obama is putting political expediency ahead of sound military and security judgment by announcing an end to troop level negotiations and a withdrawal from Iraq by year’s end. The President was slow to engage the Iraqis and there’s little evidence today’s decision is based on advice from military commanders.
America’s commitment to the future of Iraq is important to U.S. national security interests and should not be influenced by politics. Despite the great achievements of the U.S. military and the Iraqi people, there remain real threats to our shared interests, especially from Iran.
The United States must remain a firm and steadfast ally for Iraq, maintaining an ongoing diplomatic, economic, and military to military partnership with this emerging democratic ally in the Middle East.
As a veteran and commander-in-chief of national guard forces, I cannot express enough appreciation for our military service members who have protected and defended American interests in Iraq. Our Iraq war veterans made enormous sacrifices to make our nation and world safer, and I know all Americans will welcome them home with great pride and appreciation.”
What is it with naive leftist presidents, and their desire to empower Iranian mullahs?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWhat is it with imperialists, who want to dump US funds down ratholes that are labeled, for political purposes, "nascent democracies"?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseMadisonian, surely you have tongue in cheek.
You are well aware that to break the treaty would mean war with the government Bush installed and which is now an Iranian vassal state.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI agree with both of them.
Ineptitude, incompetence, lead from behind, cowardice, playing politics to his lefties, whatever you want to call it - it still smells like an outhouse on a pig farm.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseEarth to the stupid, reactionary Republican Candidates: America's "influence" in Iraq ended years ago.
Iranian influence, Chinese business deals, minority religious persecution, political dysfunction. Those pathologies didn't start when Obama became President. This "ejection" is the culmination of years of political and military miscalculation. Expect the same outcome with Afghanistan. And OBTW, we're out like 3 TRILLION bucks.
BTW, the "Surge" failed. It only moved the dysfunctional food around the plate. Saint David Petraeus came back stateside 0 for 2. And now he's pushing the buttons of his private Army at CIA.
Only he ain't that smart...
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"Only he ain't that smart..."
Then he has that in common with Obama!
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseRe: "Then he has that in common with Obama!"
Exactly Giggler. None of them are that smart.
Harvard (Obama) and Princeton (Petreaus) may have inculcated hubris and conceit in those guys, but very little wisdom.
It's about time America dialed down it's adoration of Power Elites of any political stripe
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThere should be special tax specifically collected to support nation building and wars of aggression - then we will not be so easily bamboozled into such exercises. Bachmann and Romney should start the trend by donating some of their own money to pay for all nation building that they like so much.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThere should be special tax specifically collected to support nation building and wars of aggression - then we will not be so easily bamboozled into such exercises. Bachmann and Romney should start the trend by donating some of their own money to pay for all nation building that they like so much.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseCan we just skip to next week's Romney statement, in which he forcefully argues that the Iraq withdrawal wasn't fast enough?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseShorter Bachmann: "Where's the cheap oil? We was promised cheap oil!"
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWait, you actually went back and took the time to update the post with Huntsman's thoughts on the matter? Why? Who cares?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSo Romney, Bachmann and Huntsman are willing to give up our soldiers immunity for some political points here at home?
External Link
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI don't usually agree with you but this comment is dead on.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseGeez - the isolationists, leftists, Paulites, and other ostriches always jump on any story about Iraq . . . "imperalist"?? Really?? That's the best you got? You may not agree with the decision to remove one of the greater threats to confront our nation and its interests but do you honestly think we went to war in Iraq for imperialist reasons?? You sound like Michael Moore's houseboy. Give me a break - if the US acted like an imperial power we sure didn't do it like they used to. Where's the US version of the Raj?? Where is all the oil we were going to steal? Can you maybe just accept that you disagree with the policy without denigrating those that supported the intervention in Iraq? Yeah, I know, it's not going to happen.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseNow comes Perry, who really knows how to bring the stupid.
Iraq is now our enemy, not our ally. It is a vassal of Iran, thanks to similar stupid ideas in the mind of the previous Texas Governor.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse[i]What is it with naive leftist presidents, and their desire to empower Iranian mullahs?[/i]
Huh, I didn't know Obama led the invasion to break Iraqi power which led to a dis-unified Iraq more susceptible to Iranian influence, then signed the agreement in 2008 that leads to our troop withdrawls by the end of this year.
Oh that Obama, and his magic time machine - there he goes again.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWhen did so many Kos Kids and other leftist trolls find so much time on their hands to carpet National Review comment boards? Oh wait -- that question answered itself.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseBetter late than never. Eff Iraq. That place was never going to turn into a Western democracy unless we were willing to destroy the practice of Islam.
Credit where it's due: Obama finally stops sending good money after bad. Bring ALL the troops home, we can't afford to be an Empire anymore.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse