Jerry Markon’s Washington Post story was headlined “Catholic Groups’ Ire at Obama Growing.” The headline should have been, “Sebelius’s HHS Manipulates Funding for Political Purposes, Victims of Human Trafficking Suffer.” Based on a pre-publication conversation with Markon, his most alarming revelations ended up on the cutting room floor.
Such as: Senior officials at HHS, up to and including persons in the office of the secretary, overrode career staff to give federal funds to two organizations deemed by the professionals to be unqualified.
The Obama administration inherited a program which provided a stipend to any organization in the country working to help victims of human trafficking — overwhelmingly American kids subjected to commercial sex exploitation — rebuild their lives. This program was administered successfully by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), which was competitively awarded the contract in the first place. In order to fund the two unqualified organizations, Sebelius’s political appointees set aside the results of an objective evaluation conducted by the career staff, which would have resulted in an award to the USCCB.
Two of Sebelius’s team, George Sheldon, acting assistant secretary, and Sharon Parrott, counselor to the secretary, defended their actions as “acting in the best interests of the victims.” The sad truth is, they acted with reckless disregard for the interests of victims of human trafficking.
1) The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops has been acknowledged by the government to have been “resoundingly successful” in its management of this program. HHS pitched this proven incumbent overboard in order to hand the program over to three organizations without experience in running the program, two of which submitted applications so poor as to have been deemed “non-competitive.”
2) USCCB wasn’t providing services directly to victims so much as supporting a network of service providers. Many of these organizations, such as the Salvation Army, Catholic Charities, and other faith-motivated Christian organizations, will not participate in a program that mandates abortions services, abortion counseling, or the provision of contraception. Instead of incentivizing more service providers to help victims, HHS is driving organizations out of this work.
3) The provision of abortions is banned by the Hyde Amendment and the provision of contraceptives is banned by the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, so HHS is demanding that service providers do things which HHS cannot pay for.
4) Worst of all, the provision of abortions or contraception to victims of human trafficking who have not yet been rescued is tantamount to aiding and abetting the crime of exploitation. Current victims cannot, by definition, provide informed consent, so the only beneficiary is the trafficker/pimp.
The ugly reality appears to be that Secretary Sebelius is willing to inflict further harm on a profoundly traumatized and wounded population in order to advance her ideological proclivities. And she is willing to violate funding rules to do so.
— Steven Wagner is president of the Renewal Forum. He was director of the HHS human-trafficking program from 2003–2006.
Why can't victims, "by definition," give informed consent?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe article it says "victims ... who have not yet been rescued..." These victims are not yet free of their pimps/traffickers, and are not free to make their own decisions..
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThis goes way beyond the usual liberal predeliction to not anticipate unintended but predictable consequences. It is wanton and malicious destruction of social good because that good stands as practical refutation of their naive public policy prescriptions.
That, and it prevents their declared enemies from doing good. Can't have that.
If the liberal ("progressive") establishment can justify 50 years of misery inflicted on the poor by Great Society malfeasance, what's a few (or many) thousand sexual trafficking victims in the name of ideological purity?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseOne of the problems with faith based initiatives is that government service attracts Progressives like flies. Rather than have the goverment spend money on social programs the way we conservatives want it to, we should concentrate on stopping the government from spending money on social programs. That way, when we lose control of the government we won't have to worry about the programs going to hell in a handbasket.
I know sex trafficking is a big problem, but we are better off if the government stays out of it. We conservatives (and the Progressives too, but they probably won't) should give our money directly to the faith based initiatives working on this problem. We don't need to run it thru leviathan first. Give to Caesar what is Caesar's...
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThey can't consent because they are slaves and/or trafficked/manipulated people. Steven nails it here. This is PROMOTING the sex slavery, not ending it. Congress should stop the funding till this ends.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWheew. Thank goodness that Catholics come out in the clear again. I was worried NRO might post something unflattering about the Vatican. I can sleep easily tonight.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWell, Paul, if you or your church wants to take on these duties, be our guest. This is not about the Vatican, it is about the USCCB, which provides the second largest amount of social services in the USA. If you'd prefer the government did absolutely everything, why exactly do you read NRO?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseRomania is a mafia state with not working administration governed by organized crime.
Human trafficking in Romania is a state policy and a modern retail which feed corruption and organized crime. Organized crime is constantly looking for legitimate business that could be used as a cover.Behind such companies, actually hiding network specializing in recruitment of girls who end up prostitute.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThese companies are used as a mask, to support illegal activities, to wash the money, but also because leaders mobs to be seen as successful entrepreneurs.
Besides these companies, strongly related with them, in the town of Curtea de Arges (Romania) exist more mafia groups(indestructible mafia groups) which with the complicity of local taxi drivers, recruit, transport, and place girls to practice prostitution, girls which later are trafficked external.
According to data held by the Italian authorities in Roma: 85% of prostitutes in Rome are romanian woman. In Milano: eight of ten prostitutes which practice “job” in Milano are romanian woman including Ioana Visan, Berlusconi's prostitute from Curtea de Arges (Curtea de Arges, offenders factory from Romania, manager: local corrupt police ) arrived in Italy by prostitution networks from Curtea de Arges