Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

March 5 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Corner

The one and only.

Print   |  Text
 

Anti-capitalist Movement Turns Violent

Perhaps because the Occupy Oakland protests yesterday turned violent in and through the night, Pacific Time, the blogoshere hasn’t yet had much chance to react. (Michelle Malkin is the exception.) Yesterday’s events mark an important moment in the evolution of the Occupy Wall Street movement, and not just because of the fires, the clashes with police, or the violence against banks and other businesses. Occupy Oakland deliberately sought to shut down the one of the largest ports in the United States — and succeeded in doing so.

The New York Times is playing this story as a small number of people who turned to violence after a day of mostly peaceful protests. Yet the point is that those “peaceful” protesters were trying to shut down a major American port, disrupting our economy at a moment of weakness. Both violently and non-violently, Occupy Oakland’s actions were an attack on the economy by a movement that largely rejects our system.

Here’s an excerpt from a CBS story headlined “Occupy protests go from peace to ‘chaos:’”

Organizers in Oakland had viewed the day as a significant victory. Police said that about 7,000 people participated in demonstrations throughout the day that were peaceful except for a few incidents of vandalism.

One of the protest leaders, Boots Riley, touted the day as a success, saying “we put together an ideological principle that the mainstream media wouldn’t talk about two months ago.”

His comments came before a group of demonstrators moved to break into the Travelers Aid building in order to, as some shouting protesters put it, “reclaim the building for the people.”

Riley, whose anti-capitalist views are well-documented, considered the port shut down particularly significant for organizers who targeted it in an effort to stop the “flow of capital.” The port sends goods primarily to Asia, including wine as well as rice, fruits and nuts, and handles imported electronics, apparel and manufacturing equipment, mostly from Asia, as well as cars and parts from Toyota, Honda, Nissan and Hyundai. An accounting of the financial toll from the shutdown was not immediately available.

The potential for the chaos that ultimately erupted was not something Riley wanted to even consider.

“If they do that after all this …” He paused, then added, “They’re smarter than that.”

But the peace that abided throughout the day, did not last into the night.

So an “anti-capitalist” leader of the demonstration did oppose the violence, but he also aimed to close the port of Oakland as part of an effort to jam up a system he hopes someday to overturn.

This early response to the Occupy protests by a blogger at the Chronicle of Higher Education is off-base in many respects, but gets one big point right: “We must end capitalism” has been the real point of the protests to date. Whether by shutting down a major American port or by violence in the streets, this is the message that unified the diverse tactics of Occupy Oakland last night.

New on The Corner. . .


COMMENTS   128

EXPAND  

MarkJ
   11/03/11 10:10

Here are my "Idle Questions of the Day":

1. How many union members work at the Oakland port?
2. How many of said union members are now thoroughly angered and disgusted by the Occupiers interference in their livelihoods?
3. Because of this interference, how many union members may now consider voting GOP next year?

The Occupiers may have managed to shut down the Oakland port, but I posit they simultaneously "jumped the shark" at the same time.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/03/11 10:46

If the longshoremen were paid (as I suspect) then they would certainly not complain. A gift holiday would be welcome any time.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
tw
   11/03/11 11:25

You didn't read closely enough:

"as well as cars and parts from Toyota, Honda, Nissan and Hyundai."

I'm sure the union members had no problem with this as it helps out their AFL-CIO brethren. Since the unions are one of the only actual organized supporters of the OWS crowd, that may be why and how they picked the place to start.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/03/11 10:13

Your headline omits the word "Inevitably."

Name a left-wing, anti-capitalist movement that didn't come to violence.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/03/11 10:29

You're not giving them nearly enough credit. Name a successful one which didn't have people lined up against the wall and shot (or whatever the technology allowed).

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/03/11 10:15

So, they consider it a victory that they have put people out of work. That PROVES they're in league with Obama.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/03/11 10:17

They're Marxists with a few anarchists thrown into the mix. This is an unsurprising development.

Stop telling us they are "anti Capitalist" and start saying what they are and have always been.

This is going to bs very harmful to Democrats next year. But if the GOP caves, and so far they have shown exceptional willingness to do so, I think you'll see a third party candidate next fall and Obama wins with 42% of the popular vote. That the GOP is not proclaiming this a fundamentalist Marxist movement, and tying it to Obama and the Democrats, is appallingly stupid.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
 JPK
   11/03/11 10:19

I wonder if Janet Napoletano even noticed? I doubt it; she's so focused on returnning Vets and Teapartiers to give real violence much notice.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/03/11 10:27

It was a real missed opportunity in Oakland. If they had told the longshoremen to go home WITHOUT PAY until such time as the port could reopen, within about 15 minutes there would have been an open port and hospital ERs filled with hippies.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/03/11 10:32

Waiting for Slide et al to show up trying to defend this, bleating about how well OWS polls with the public, how the GOP best embrace the movement like the Democrats have, blah blah blah.

Oh, wait - External Link 

Inevitably, public opinion has quickly soured on these violent morons. What a surprise.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/03/11 10:52

WASHINGTON — Four Georgia men in their 60s and 70s were arrested Tuesday, accused of being members of a right-wing militia group that plotted to attack federal office buildings and to disperse a deadly biological poison in Atlanta.

Their alleged plot was revealed to the FBI by a confidential informant last spring, and members of the group have been meeting since May with someone they thought was a black-market weapons dealer but who turned out to be an undercover federal agent, according to court documents.

No attacks were ever attempted. Federal officials say the men were disrupted before they could act on the plot.

The documents say the men, Frederick Thomas, 73, of Cleveland, Ga.; Dan Roberts, 67, Ray Adams, 65, and Samuel Crump, 68, all of Toccoa, called themselves "the covert group" and began in March to talk about staging attacks against federal targets including the IRS.

A confidential informant secretly recorded some of the meetings for the FBI.

"I'd say the first ones that need to die is the ones in the government buildings," Adams was overheard saying in an April 16 meeting, according to the FBI.

"When it comes down to it, I can kill somebody," he allegedly said.

External Link 

------------------------

its easy to pick out some fringe elements of a movement and ascribe it to the broader cause. I can do this all day. Show me examples of violence from the left and I will deplore it and in turn I will show you violence from the right. I expect you would deplore it as well. Right? right?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/03/11 10:57

Yes, Slide attempts to change the topic because he can't defend the actions of the organizers of the riots.

Accountability, like dead Mexicans, don't matter to Slide.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/03/11 11:03

I think "Slide" is a female troll, not male. There's something distinctively feminine in her prose.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/03/11 12:32

Well, at least a vegan who moisturizes.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/03/11 11:00

What movement are these guys associated with? The Tea Party? The article mentions no such association. The only association is merely rhetorical through labeling them "right-wing", i.e. the usual attempt to create a phony association between conservatives and political violence. The link between OWS Oakland and violence is a lot more than a strained attempt by detractors to associate them, somehow, in some way, with violence. It IS OWS Oakland.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/03/11 11:17

@Slide- I like how you completely ignored the poll that showed that the public have turned against your little rapist/violent buddies. Whereas last week your entire "argument" was that polls showed the public approved with the OWS rapists.

Makes it tough to call it a "fringe movement" when it's the movement itself that's raping, closing ports, assaulting police and women and calling for death to the Jews. This is the modern Left's base, Slide, deal with it.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/03/11 11:54

The problem is this. The rioters in Oakland aren't fringe elements. They are the core of OWS, and the public has figured this out.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
scc
   11/03/11 12:58

"The documents say the men, Frederick Thomas, 73, of Cleveland, Ga.; Dan Roberts, 67, Ray Adams, 65, and Samuel Crump, 68, all of Toccoa, called themselves "the covert group" ...

Where do you suppose this "covert group" meet? My guess is that they meet, under the cover of darkness, in rocking chairs, on the front proch of their retirement community club house. "Viva la viagra!"

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/03/11 10:36

The real attack on the economy comes from Republican politicians and the do nothing Congress they created, which refuses to do anything about the economic crisis they created when they refused to adequately regulate financial markets. First they fail to regulate Wall Street. Then they bail out Wall Street. Then they insist that Main Street is on its own. Apparently, the harsher side of capitalism is only good for Main Street, but not Wall Street.

And don't tell me about the 15 poisonous partisan bills passed by the Republican House. First of all, none of those address the immediate economic crisis. Second of all, due to their completely partisan nature, they are not serious proposals. No credit where it is not due. The same can be said for the farce that is the House "budget."

Obviously, any violence or vandalism is regrettable. But to act as though these isolated incidents are completely representative of the Occupy Wall Street movement is nothing more than propaganda more or less equivalent to the attempt to identify all Tea Party protestors as racists due to a few in the crowd. I fully expect fundamentally dishonest partisans, like Michelle Malkin, to distort the facts. That is how they make their living, instead of being actual productive members of society.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/03/11 10:53

I'm impressed.

David got all those talking points in one post. Wonder if he gets paid a bulk rate for that.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Load More Comments

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact