Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Corner

The one and only.

Print   |  Text
 

Hobbyist Photographer Describes Assault in Zuccotti Park

It always helps to put a face to a name, even if it is a bruised and bloodied one. Here is such a face. It belongs to Bruce Fancher, a hobbyist photographer who lives “a few blocks” from the Occupy Wall Street encampment in Lower Manhattan. It is this way because he ventured into Zuccotti Park on Sunday with a camera and took a few pictures. For his trouble he was “punched in the face by one of the lovely young idealists.”

Bruce was taking photographs of tents when a man approached him and told to him to “have some respect.” He calmly explained that it was a public park and he had every right to be there. Before he knew it, his camera had been smacked out of his hands, and his face had been punched. Bleeding fairly heavily from his nose, he went and described the assault to one of the many policeman in the square. An ambulance was called, and arrived almost immediately. When she was finished, the EMT told him that it was the “fourteenth assault” to which she had personally been called.

The professionalism of the first responders stopped there, however. “There is a certain expectation of the police,” Bruce told me, but service was not forthcoming: The NYPD officer steadfastly refused to go back into the park, suggesting that to do so would “cause a riot.” As a result, the assailant, described as “light, about 28 years old, muscular, short hair, and well dressed,” got away unpunished. When he described the attack to the reporting cop, the reaction was “indifference. I may as well have told him that it was going to rain tomorrow.” He received little sympathy from the OWS crowd either. Amazingly, “no one saw anything,” and no help was proferred. Perhaps “love for all” doesn’t apply as universally as advertised in the commune.

Yesterday, I went back to the park with Bruce to try and get some answers from those who have set themselves up as the movement’s representatives. We met with a press spokesman who has clearly swallowed a couple of textbooks on postmodernism. The meeting was not fruitful: 

Therein lies the beauty of the situation that the OWS brigade has created. We hear much of the “institutions” that the camp has set up; of the working groups, the security detail, the liaison officers, the medical tents, and so forth. When complaints are made about the growing crime within the tent city, these organisations are quickly lauded as an example of the civic responsibility exhibited by the “occupiers.” And yet, when it comes down to an actual case, victims are told that not only can they not control their own people, but that they are not responsible for their actions. As I noted last week, this is an organisation which, despite lip service to the contrary, regards itself as being inherently outside of the law.

New on The Corner. . .


COMMENTS   216

EXPAND  

   11/08/11 13:18

Again, any sort of criminal behavior like this should be punished. The NYPD should step in and enforce the law if the victim can identify the perpetrator.

That said, the whole purpose of this article is obviously to discredit the OWS movement, not to bring justice for a wrong.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Roger H.
   11/08/11 13:24

Seems to me it's doing an excellent job of discrediting itself.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/08/11 13:30

While I thinkt that there is some truth to what you say and I definately agree that this serves a conservative political purpose: There is also some credence to the notion that Mayor Bloomberg and the NYPD are trying to avoid agitating their "guests" in zucotti park less they appear to not support the fringe of their political base.

Oh and the Chevy VOLT Sucks.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Wild tchoupitoulos
   11/08/11 13:34

No, the purpose of this article is to describe real events that occurred. It's called journalism. If the real events paint the OWSers in a bad light than it is their real acts that discredit them, not the journalist who spreads word of the event.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/08/11 13:35

Yes, Goddess Forbid the assaults, rapes, vandalism, and violence at the OWS should be covered by media. That would be so wrong.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/08/11 13:37

On the contrary, I think they should be covered. And I think the individuals who perpetrate such acts should be held accountable.

And the protests themselves should continue, minus the bad apples.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/08/11 13:42

The "protests" are facilitating these crimes by creating an environment for them to take place. By unlawfully "occupying" public space in perpetuity—with built-in hostility towards the authorities who would normally enforce law and order—they have created an enclave of lawlessness.

PROTESTS may go on, but occupation cannot.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/08/11 13:45

What makes you think the protestors aren't the bad apples? What are they doing to get rid of those bad apples? Do you really think they wouldn't riot if the police came wading in their camp to arrest anyone? Would they turn over anyone if the police asked?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/08/11 13:52

If the OWS'ers were in agreement with you, they would be doing all in their power to ensure that the bad actors amongst them be removed and punished.

Since they are instead closing ranks around the bad actors, their behavior shows that they don't want such behavior covered or punished.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/08/11 14:09

Good point. The OWSholes certainly don't seem to mind that thugs have "infiltrated" their "peaceful" movement.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/08/11 13:55

"On the contrary, I think they should be covered. And I think the individuals who perpetrate such acts should be held accountable.

And the protests themselves should continue, minus the bad apples."

Then you're obviously in the minority among the OWS crowd. Sorry, mega-down twinkles Davey!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/08/11 19:29

"the protests themselves should continue, minus the bad apples."

That would de-populate the movement down to two gullible libertarians who believe there is some smidgen of legitimacy to their beefs.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/08/11 13:38

It's easy enough to discredit a mob of thugs - this is just one example of many.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/08/11 13:40

Really? Well, you're probably correct, but after listening to what many of these people have to say and watching their antics, I think they are doing an admirable job of bringing discredit to the movement all by themselves.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
DonM
   11/08/11 13:44

No, the whole purpose of this article is not to discredit the OWS movement. Rather, its to point out the double standard that applies here: when an organization's goals are in accord with the goals of those currently in power, the MSM refuses to point out its transgressions; but when the organization opposes those in power, the MSM will only report its transgressions -- or make up some, since plainly, they are consonsant with the greater truth, and therefore true, even though false in a trivial bourgeois sense.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/08/11 13:49

"That said, the whole purpose of this article is obviously to discredit the OWS movement, not to bring justice for a wrong."

The two aren't mutually exclusive. Besides, the occupiers have a simple solution to anyone who wants to discredit them with these reports. They can either take care of the bad apples themselves or allow the police to do it. As the article points out, the occupiers are choosing none of the above.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/08/11 13:50

Nobody needs to discredit the OWS movement. They are doing that all by themselves.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/08/11 13:19

Does anyone doubt for a moment that if this had happened at a Tea Party rally to a photographer, that it wouldn't have made national news?

The only detail the story is missing is the name or badge number of the policeman. I'd like to hear Ray Kelly defend the inaction of his officers, particularly when there's a name attached to that inaction.

How long would this circus be tolerated in Central Park?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/08/11 13:22

I suppose he's lucky nobody whizzed on him.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/08/11 13:26

Or raped him. And it's probably a good thing he doesn't have Semitic features. Simple assault is sort of a best-case scenario with the OWS crowd.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Load More Comments

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact