Lines of Attack

by Ramesh Ponnuru

1. Scott Galupo thinks that Gingrich has a winning argument against Romney: He’s done a lot more to advance conservative causes in office.

2. Attacking Gingrich for supporting amnesty may seem at first glance to be a smart play for his rivals, but the fact is that none of the candidates is categorically opposed to granting legal status to a lot of illegal immigrants–and several of them have expressed openness to the idea. The better critique is the one Mark Steyn and Mark Krikorian suggest: Gingrich’s plan is half-baked in a stereotypically Gingrichian way.

The Corner

The one and only.