Senator John Kerry (D., Mass.) is in Egypt, meeting with leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood — the Islamist organization whose goals are to destroy Israel, “conquer Europe” and “conquer America” (to quote its most influential jurist, Sheikh Yusuf Qaradawi).
The Brotherhood, which operates throughout the world, seeks the imposition by governments of strict sharia law (as outlined in Reliance of the Traveller: A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law) and, eventually, a global caliphate. Naturally, the Obama administration describes it as a “largely secular” and moderate organization — and William Taylor, President Obama’s hand-picked “special coordinator for transitions in the Middle East,” announced last month that the administration would be quite “satisfied” with a Brotherhood victory in the Egyptian elections.
As the Investigative Project on Terrorism reports, Kerry, the 2004 Democratic presidential nominee and key Obama administration congressional ally, “welcomed the results of Egypt’s first democratic elections,” in which “voters gave the Muslim Brotherhood’s Freedom and Justice Party (FJP) nearly 40% of seats, and more than 24% went to the ultra-conservative Salafi coalition led by al-Nour Party.” [ACM: by ultraconservative, IPT means al-Nour is somewhat more impatient than the Brotherhood for the imposition of supremacist Islam; as I've explained on other occasions, the Muslim Brotherhood is Salafist in its ideology.]
In addition to praising the Brotherhood’s election as a model of transparency and integrity, Sen. Kerry also called for an infusion of cash from the International Monetary Fund to undergird Egypt’s new Islamist government.
The United States, though over $15 trillion in debt, is the leading contributor-nation to the IMF, providing close to a fifth of its funding. That is about three times as much as second-place Japan, more than four times as much as China, more than six times as much as the leading Islamist country (Saudi Arabia), and more than the combined contributions of the three top European donors — Germany, Britain and France. (See Wikipedia Table, here.) Consequently, a cash infusion by the IMF to the Brotherhood-led Egyptian government would be a redistribution of wealth from American taxpayers to Islamists whose goal is to conquer American taxpayers — assuming, of course, there is any money left in the IMF after the Obama administration gets done using it as the device through which tapped out American taxpayers bail out, at least temporarily, Europe’s collapsing experiment in trans-continental socialism.
Ironically, Kerry’s overtures and pledge of support to the Brotherhood come only a few days after a federal appeals court upheld the convictions of five top Brotherhood operatives in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation (HLF) trial, the Justice Department’s most significant terrorism support conspiracy prosecution in recent years. As the proof overwhelming demonstrated, the Brotherhood, through its American affiliates, channeled millions of dollars to Hamas to support terror operations against Israel. Hamas is the Brotherhood’s Palestinian branch, and underwriting its campaign to destroy Israel has long been a top priority for the Brotherhood’s satellite organizations in the West — many of which were designated “unindicted coconspirators” by the Justice Department in the HLF case, and shown by the evidence to have abetted the Hamas-support scheme.
Almost two years ago, I wrote a book about the history of the Muslim Brotherhood, including: its game-plan for overcoming opposition in the Middle East and the West; its support for a post-sovereign order in which national interests are subordinated to the interests of the global Muslim community; its implacable hostility to America’s liberty culture; and its collusion with Leftist American politicians who, for different reasons, also support a post-sovereign order in which American national interests and American individual liberty give way to the priorities of the international Left. The book is called The Grand Jihad: How Islam and the Left Sabotage America – [shameless plug: the book, a bestseller, has just been released in paperback with a new preface that charts the game-plan's ongoing progress].
I took the title taken from an internal Brotherhood memorandum in which senior organization leaders describe their work in America as a “grand jihad” aimed at “eliminating and destroying” the West “from within” by “sabotage.” In carrying out this work, the Brotherhood banks on the support of influential Leftist politicians in the United States and Europe.
The book has been dismissed by Islamic democracy-project enthusiasts. In fact, as late as a couple of days ago, it was panned as a “shallow idea” by former Bush speechwriter Michael Gerson — who also rebuked GOP presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich for purportedly allowing himself to be influenced by it. I’ll have more to say in due course about Mr. Gerson, a transnational progressive gussied up as a “compassionate conservative,” whose concept of a good idea is the promotion of popular elections that are guaranteed to empower America-hating Islamists and expel American allies — while imperiling religious minorities and demoralizing both secular democrats and authentic Muslim moderates.
I’ll stick with the shallow idea, thank you. You can keep ignoring the game-plan, of course, but I think the Brotherhood would tell you it is right on schedule.
You act as if the Obama administration would think it's a bad thing for Israel to be destroyed.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseJust when you think they can't sink any lower.
It makes you wonder what Kerry is getting in exchange for this pandering.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSo in essence, Mr McCarthy is saying we should not encourage free elections since they sometimes can lead to Islamist parties joining or leading the government but rather prop up failing autocrats that encourage Islamist parties and everyone else to violently oppose the autocrat?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI guess Mr. McCarthy has been hanging out too much with Pam Gellar and Frank Gaffney who see Islamist boogeymen in our Thanksgiving turkeys.
And there goes the point. Oh look, presume missed it.
The point is that if they elect terrorists in questionable elections then we should not be funding them. Iran claims free and open elections (so did Iraq under Hussain). So you support funding them too? How about Cuba?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseYou can't seriously connect Andrew McCarthy with the extreme views of Pam Geller, presume. And you did entirely miss McCarthy's point.
The Obama administration has taken the exact opposite position of longstanding American policies in the region. The U.S. has not been backing dictators for the fun of it but in the recognition that far more malevolent forces than the dictators were standing in the wings chomping at the bit to grab power.
The Obama administration encouraged the overthrow of the dictators like Mubarak thinking that anything would be better than his leadership. They too actively supported the fall of Mubarak and I'm strictly guessing here, but I would not doubt they may have even had a covert hand in stirring up the rebellion through social media. That's what it smells like to me.
Like a house of cards, the fragile balance of power in the Middle East has come tumbling down nation by nation. What we are left with is a new Middle East with far fewer Western-friendly governments in power having been replaced by fanatic Islamists filled with hatred for Israel and the USA...even for western civilization. This is a bell that cannot be unrung and will cause the world problems for years to come.
Yet the Obama administration is clueless as to what they have done. Apparently, you are clueless too.
Hopefully the American public has had enough of the amateur in the White House, Hopefully we will elect someone who is not just able to debate Obama, but someone capable of reserving all the horrible foreign and domestic paths that Obama & friends have set us on.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseREVERSING....not reserving
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWell said! ;-)
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"The Obama administration encouraged the overthrow of the dictators like Mubarak thinking that anything would be better than his leadership. They too actively supported the fall of Mubarak and I'm strictly guessing here, but I would not doubt they may have even had a covert hand in stirring up the rebellion through social media. That's what it smells like to me."
The Evil Dictator? Obama's convenient choice of words, right? Because he’s wrong. He's a liar and a manipulator. He's evil.
"What we are left with is a new Middle East with far fewer Western-friendly governments in power having been replaced by fanatic Islamists filled with hatred for *Israel and the *USA...even for *western civilization."
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIn the real world, you often have to choose between the lesser of two evils.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIn this case, Mubarak was less evil than is the Muslim brotherhood. So yes, we should have supported an aging autocrat over a murderous band of thugs.
"... whose goals are to destroy Israel, “conquer Europe” and “conquer America” ..."
Kerry might prefer France and Belgium be left alone, but otherwise this seems to line up with mainstream Democratic Party goals.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseJohn Kerry always the traitor. Keep this POS.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"whose goals are to destroy Israel, “conquer Europe” and “conquer America” "
And my goal is to become benevolent despot of the world. It's roughly as realistic and should provoke comparable amounts of concern.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseNever mind that Muslim Brotherhood actually engages in acts from mere intimidation to outright murder and terrorism. Their goals are ultimately unattainable, and so they're harmless and unworthy of concern.
Such a morally reprehensible position is bad enough without illogic of that caliber.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWhat, was Jane Fonda not available?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseHow appropriate that John Kerry sidles up to a group prepared to conquer us in a fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse