Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Corner

The one and only.

Print   |  Text
 

Judge: Wisconsin Elections Board Must Strike Faulty Names

A few weeks ago, the Wisconsin Government Accountability Board (GAB) said that it would not be checking petitions for the recall of Gov. Scott Walker for duplicates and false names. According to the GAB, all signatures, even if someone signed “Adolph Hitler” or “Mickey Mouse,” would be given the presumption of validity until the Walker campaign flagged and challenged them. One individual bragged that he had signed the recall petitions 80 times; all of which would count unless Walker found them, and then moved to strike.

The Walker campaign immediately filed a lawsuit, charging that the GAB had a responsibility to review the petitions and eliminate any obviously fraudulent names. Yesterday, a Waukesha judge agreed with Walker, and ordered the GAB to take “reasonable” efforts to eliminate duplicate and fictitious names:

The ruling by Waukesha County Circuit Judge J. Mac Davis came in a case filed Dec. 15 by Walker’s campaign committee and Stephan Thompson, executive director of the state Republican Party, asking Davis to order the accountability board to seek out and eliminate duplicate and fictitious signatures and illegible addresses in recall petitions.

Davis, who refused to enter injunctions in the case, based his decision on his interpretation of state law, more than on equal protection arguments brought up by the Republicans. He also said that the board must take “reasonable” efforts to eliminate such signatures.

Kevin Kennedy, director and general counsel of the board, said after the hearing that his organization would have to discuss the decision to see what it needed to change in procedures already in place.

In court, Kennedy testified that entering signatures into a database to look for duplicates could take eight extra weeks for his staff, and could cost $94,000 for software and outside help.

Steven M. Biskupic, attorney for the Republicans, argued that not catching invalid signatures violated the constitutional rights to equal protection of people who chose not to sign recall petitions.

He also cited a media report that one man claimed he’d signed recall petitions 80 times, and submitted a petition from last summer’s attempt to recall Sen. Jim Holperin (D-Conover), in which the accountability board allowed a “Bugs Bunny” signature to be counted. Kennedy said the signature was counted because Holperin didn’t follow the proper procedures for challenging it.

In issuing his ruling, Davis said, “Counting the signature of Bugs Bunny is something only lawyers could try to make seem OK.”

Incidentally, the lawsuit was filed in Waukesha County as the result of a little-noticed bill Governor Walker signed in the wake of the state-capitol protests last spring. After Walker’s bill to essentially eliminate public-sector collective bargaining passed, Democrats challenged the law’s legality in the heavily liberal Dane County district court, where it was briefly overturned. (Eventually, the state supreme court reinstated the law.)

Legislative Republicans, arguing that not every lawsuit related to state government should have to run through Dane County courts (where the state capitol of Madison is located), passed a bill allowing lawsuits relating to state government to be filed in the home county of the complainant. In this case, the lawsuit was filed by state GOP executive director Stephan Thompson, who lives in Waukesha County — a much friendlier venue.

Finally, the GAB lawsuit exposes the complete lack of originality recall petition signers have in coming up with fake names. Bugs Bunny? Mickey Mouse? C’mon, people. Nobody could throw in a “Dorothy Mantooth” (she’s a saint) or a “Corky St. Clair?”

Final signatures are due January 17. On December 15, recall organizers said they had collected 507,000 of the 540,000 signatures they would need to force a recall election. This week, they announced that they would not be publicly announcing how many signatures they have collected until they finally turn them in later this month.

— Christian Schneider is a senior fellow at the Wisconsin Policy Research Institute and a co-author of the Campaign Manager Survey.

New on The Corner. . .


COMMENTS   22

EXPAND  

   01/06/12 13:48

Thank God for two things:

1) Leftists are willing to openly declare that they enjoy acting like a bunch of cartoon characters;

2) “Counting the signature of Bugs Bunny is something only lawyers could try to make seem OK.”

Judges like J. Mac Davis are a rare breed -- those who thankfully have no compunction against insulting the members of the judges' profession.

Thank you, Your Honor. Much obliged.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/06/12 13:55

"...entering signatures into a database to look for duplicates could take eight extra weeks for his staff, and could cost $94,000 for software and outside help."

Does it really cost that much in time, money and resources to throw some figures into an Excel spreadsheet and hit 'run'? Talk about typical government inefficiency at its worst and most embarrassing.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/06/12 14:59

Yep - this is possibly the most frustrating, idiotic part of the whole mess. Are they frickin' joking with this? $94,000? This Kennedy idiot should be embarrassed.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/06/12 15:10

He's probably including the cost of the pizza.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
 GWB
   01/06/12 17:45

*puts on my Excel geek hat* ~ahem~
Older Excel versions won't handle more than 65,536 rows of data in a worksheet. Even though the newer ones handle more (something like 1million in 2010), I still wouldn't use Excel - I think it would probably bog down a mainframe. Trust me when I say that Excel would handle this poorly.

Put all the data in a database and run an SQL query, instead. And, I'm sure no one on that staff knows how to produce SQL queries, or even how to build the necessary formulas in Excel, so they have to hire outside help. Of course, even that won't eliminate the need for the good old Mark1 eyeball roving over the signature pages - you might not think to put "Hans Kantzenjammer" in the query as a bogus name, but it just might leap out at you when you scan visually.

I can see it costing some buck$ (and time) - putting in the data will be tedious work, as will manually perusing the data. A chunk of that money might be overtime, since it will probably require more than 40 hours per week with the employees they already have. If he played it right, the governor could offer to pay for it - then make hay with that fact in his political ads in the recall election or when he runs for re-election.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/06/12 14:16

I imagine an effort to recall Judge Davis will now commence.
Speaking of recall efforts, if the petntion drive was some 30k short of the minimum a month ago, can it be said they're cutting it awfully close? Of course, to paraphrase Stalin, it's not how many signatures you collect--it's who counts the signatures.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Rick W
   01/06/12 14:32

Your Stalin quote reminded me of a line spoken by Greta Garbo in her movie Ninotchka: "The last mass trials were a great success. There are going to be fewer but better Russians."

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/06/12 14:41

Greta would have voted for Paul. ;)

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/06/12 14:18

Given the quality of judgement shown by the GAB to date, I can see them spending 30 seconds quickly rifling through the list, then declaring:

"Yup, looks good to me."

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/06/12 14:20

"In court, Kennedy testified that entering signatures into a database to look for duplicates could take eight extra weeks for his staff,"

Yet they seem to think it is reasonable to give Walker's staff only a couple of weeks to do the same thing.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/06/12 14:26

The people who start recall petitions should bear the cost of verifying the signatures.

A 50 cent donation from everyone who signs a petition should cover it. Of course if you sign it 80 times, your costs would go up as well.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/06/12 16:34

Why wouldn't intentionally falsifying a signature or knowingly accepting the same be criminal fraud? On a recall petition, a signature has some of the same force as a vote. Of course, I realize that voter fraud is a Democrat Party tradition....

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
 GWB
   01/06/12 17:04

And, that it never occurs! Just one more example that doesn't exist........

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
 GWB
   01/06/12 17:48

Though I understand the frustration, I don't think I agree. It would put an economic damper on exercise of "petitioning the government for redress" and would only empower those who can dip into the public purse: public sector unions and incumbent politicians.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Patrick Carroll
   01/06/12 14:22
   01/06/12 17:31
   01/06/12 14:23

"This week, they announced that they would not be publicly announcing how many signatures they have collected until they finally turn them in later this month."

Sounds like the rate of signature gathering has slowed down significantly.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/06/12 18:48

...or they will not go public with the short-fall which gives them time to come up with more fake signatures...

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/06/12 15:11

Union goons in their black leather jackets have taken to the streets in my Indiana neighborhood, handing out fliers opposing Right to Work legislation that's sure to pass if Democrats who were elected to serve all Hoosiers - not just those who support unions - would show up for work. The January session of the legislature can't be called to order without a quorum so Democrats are hiding out (they call it a filibuster) to prevent the majority party from forcing legislation down the throats of people who don't want it. Apparently, those of us who do want it don't count, along with all the other legislation that isn't being acted upon while Democrats serve their union masters.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/06/12 16:29

What? The nasty GOP is preventing Bugs Bunny from voting or signing petitions? What's up, Doc? A clear case of species-ism.

In any case, Bugs has proven himself far more intelligent than your average Madison, Wisconsin Democrat. In fact, based on his intelligent and resourceful behavior in many classic cartoons, I am certain that Bugs is in fact a Republican (although not a Romney supporter), and did not actually sign that petition.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Load More Comments

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact