For a non-important endorsement (or so the Mittbots would desperately like us to know) it sure gets a lot of air play. Red headline on Drudge, top story mention on every conservative website from Townhall to HotAir.
Todd Palin is 100% right, of course. Anybody but Romney.
Sarah was so promising long ago. Then she decided to embrace the Maverick Platform, one of the most moderate - Democratic Partisan appeasing efforts.
Gingrich finally gets an endorsement, even as he looks creepy with his destructive offering. Ironic to see Todd favor another Beltway Celebrity who also entertains Amnesty, Cap and Trade, Federal Mandates, etc.
The Palin offering in the 2010 midterms provided some disasters, which only enabled the Democratic Party. Delaware was a disaster. Looks as if they are providing the same poor offering again in 2012.
Donna Brazile was just embarrassed on live TV recently trying to say basically the same thing. Everyone laughed at the Democrat, knowing the opposite is true. The Democrats are very fearful of Romney getting the Nomination.
One has to wonder why Sara offers such silliness. Does her own personal ambitions sway her offering, or is it more gaming to exploit Our Base with fashionable appeals?
Sara's mistaken claim the Democrats want Romney in the General, reminds one of the very misguided embarrassment she provided during Christmas about a Card.
About an hour ago, Rich Lowry Tweeted the following while covering a Newt campaign stop....
"Whoa-newt hits " small group of rich ppl manipulating the lives of 1000s of ppl, and taking all the money"
https://twitter.com/#!/RichLowry
I hope Rich writes a bit more expansively on this Gingrich stump speech. I don't know how ANYONE who calls themselves a Republican, much less a conservative Republican, would believe that this is what conservatism is all about: Class warfare?
Gingrich's comments could have been authored by Micheal Moore or David Axelrod.
Gingrich on capitalism--i.e., "a small group of rich people manipulating the lives of 1000s of people and took all the money.."
How about a small group of fed social engineering Freddie Mac CEOs & their Washington insider operatives (Newt) taking all that money to manipulate the U.S. economy & then tanking it?
Didn't "I will remain positive--period" Gingrich just recant his Obama class warfare demagoguery?
The "news" here is that ABC News thinks this is worthy of reporting.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseRight up there with Megan McCain's endorsement of Romney. Not sure about this, but I have heard that Dr. Jill Biden is endorsing Obama.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseGingrich gets Dodd (Todd?) who?
WOW!
Unhinged NRO is scrapping the barrel.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseFor a non-important endorsement (or so the Mittbots would desperately like us to know) it sure gets a lot of air play. Red headline on Drudge, top story mention on every conservative website from Townhall to HotAir.
Todd Palin is 100% right, of course. Anybody but Romney.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseHEH, that is what the Democratic Party is saying1
Of course, this is silly...
Anyone but Romney reveals a dysfunctional personal bias.
Does this included Obama?
Anyone but Romney is nonsense. Ann Coulter is absolutely right:
"The wild swings -- at least in the polls -- from one populist right-winger to another suggested that some Republicans were determined to change the meaning of "conservative" from "normal person who wants to protect what's best in mainstream America" to "perpetually indignant, restless carper against everything, obsessed with symbolic issues, determined to punish the country for its impurities."
Romney is clearly the best, the fashion is playing a game which isn't conservative.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSarah was so promising long ago. Then she decided to embrace the Maverick Platform, one of the most moderate - Democratic Partisan appeasing efforts.
Gingrich finally gets an endorsement, even as he looks creepy with his destructive offering. Ironic to see Todd favor another Beltway Celebrity who also entertains Amnesty, Cap and Trade, Federal Mandates, etc.
The Palin offering in the 2010 midterms provided some disasters, which only enabled the Democratic Party. Delaware was a disaster. Looks as if they are providing the same poor offering again in 2012.
Ironically, Sara sadly is losing more credibility providing fashionable denial like this:
Governor Palin: “I Believe The Mainstream Media And Obama Want To Face Mitt Romney In The General Election"
Donna Brazile was just embarrassed on live TV recently trying to say basically the same thing. Everyone laughed at the Democrat, knowing the opposite is true. The Democrats are very fearful of Romney getting the Nomination.
One has to wonder why Sara offers such silliness. Does her own personal ambitions sway her offering, or is it more gaming to exploit Our Base with fashionable appeals?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSara's mistaken claim the Democrats want Romney in the General, reminds one of the very misguided embarrassment she provided during Christmas about a Card.
See the folly here:
"Republicans Are Furious About Obama's Christmas Card... Wait Till They See Reagan's"
Sara made an issue about the Obama Card, having no idea the Reagan's provided a similar Christmas Card in the past.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAbout an hour ago, Rich Lowry Tweeted the following while covering a Newt campaign stop....
"Whoa-newt hits " small group of rich ppl manipulating the lives of 1000s of ppl, and taking all the money"
https://twitter.com/#!/RichLowry
I hope Rich writes a bit more expansively on this Gingrich stump speech. I don't know how ANYONE who calls themselves a Republican, much less a conservative Republican, would believe that this is what conservatism is all about: Class warfare?
Gingrich's comments could have been authored by Micheal Moore or David Axelrod.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseNow that this weighty matter is settled, an anxious nation only awaits the decision out of Interstate 495 -
Who is Snooki endorsing?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI was trying to think of something snarky to say about this, and then I saw your comment. Nothing I say will top yours.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseGingrich on capitalism--i.e., "a small group of rich people manipulating the lives of 1000s of people and took all the money.."
How about a small group of fed social engineering Freddie Mac CEOs & their Washington insider operatives (Newt) taking all that money to manipulate the U.S. economy & then tanking it?
Didn't "I will remain positive--period" Gingrich just recant his Obama class warfare demagoguery?
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse