Gee, yet another NRO writer tagging Newt with a Nazi slur.

I miss the good old days when a slur like this would only be delivered by the leftist media.

Just pathetic, NRO. Simply pathetic.

Romney bias much?

hehehehehe...

I tried to express it, using many words, you accurately do it with one sentence.

What is Mr. Lowry thinking?

Romney solved the problem of how to turn himself from a really rich guy (3rd base) into an obscenely rich guy (home plate). Please explain how the world is now a better place for that.

"...yet it’s not terribly sympathetic or always very intuitive. In an ideal world, you would not pick a representative of this particular sector of the economy to be your presidential candidate."

This silly Mr. Lowry.
Absolutely silly.

Did you really believe a Washington Politician of 17 years without any executive experience, lacking private sector ability, having no economic credentials, would be better? Even someone who opposed "Right To Work"?

We need to run on the Free Market, period. We have to challenge the very flawed concepts floating around in today's fashionable mindset taking us all downward, before it is too late - to remind all why the US Capitalist System is the most healthy for all.

Mr. Barnes looked so poor the other night with hsi offering as well. The entire Panel was terrible, accepting suspect poll data attributed to a pro-Gingrich outlet, the desperate attacks of Democratic Partisans, the weak politics of populism, even the ugly in the form of Gingrich, Perry, etc.

Although Romney has accurately stated his experience in the Private Sector makes him a better Candidate for the Presidency as compared to Washington Politicians who have no clue. He has provided a number of reasons why he is a strong Presidential potential, as well as his excellence via Bain.

It is amazing, as if these major Conservative pundits are missing the entire picture out of laziness or intent. Bill Kristol for example clearly has an irrational emotive bias. It almost seems as if a number of these Pundits are afraid of populism or anti-Capitalist nonsense. Perhaps they too, have an unhealthy bias against a success from the Private Sector (which Mr. Kristol seems to possess). Haven't they bothered to see how unpopular the "occupy" movement is today? Perhaps they don't even fully grasp the positives of what an excellent private equity firm like Bain is today, creating opportunity, prosperity, etc.

But they clearly have not studied, or mistakenly fail to reference, Mr. Romney's entire record. The experience and success provided via Bain is a political strength, no doubt about it. But Romney has so many positives. Romney's competent leadership saving the Olympics is a prime example. He has a track record for turning around failure. Romney's record as Gov. in MA is excellent as well, having balanced an inherited deficit of 3 Billion, cut taxation 19 times, lowered regulatory burdens, turning around an anti-Business climate, etc: “a solid record of conservative accomplishment as governor of Massachusetts”

Regretfully, the sideline punditry has been so lackluster, so terribly mistaken. Perhaps because they are more alike to a number of Washington Politicians, who simply don't understand the real Private Sector. More and more we grow to realize why terrible Democratic Partisans remain a viable political threat, past the MSM partisan blanket. Those who sell opinion on the sound side look as if they really don't know what they are talking about. They seem eager to enable the opposite.

Just days ago, sideline voices were telling us how we needed a strident bombast to run as the genuine conservative. Now some are worried about running an unabashed, accomplished, conservative Free Market Capitalist.

You have to be kidding, the contradictions are vivid. The sideline opinion game continues to sink.

You about nailed it!

I looked at the fact-check piece linked in the article. The video received "Four Pinocchios." I'm reminded of Newt saying, over and over, "The ad got Four Pinocchios. Do you know how hard it is to get Four Pinocchios?"

Well, Newt, I guess now you know.

"some of us will be called upon to sacrifice more than others"

Unless you're earning over $250,000 per year, in which case sacrifice in the form of a return to surplus-era marginal income tax rates must never, ever be permitted.

The irony is that Mitt is winning this Primary largely due to his perceived "electability." The further irony is that he bases his electability on his "business" background. An irony too far for me is that there is about a zero chance he would actually try to impose the "Bain Treatment" on the Federal Government were his campaign to survive the coming (cherry-picked) attacks on his Bain experience.