If the recent controversy over collective bargaining in Wisconsin has done anything, it has lifted up a rock to expose how many cretins manage to slither below the surface of legitimate political dialogue. There’s the guy who screamed expletives at a 14-year-old girl speaking at a Tea Party rally. There’s the guy who poured a beer on the head of the state lawmaker. We saw the dopes who gave a Nazi salute to veterans in an attempt to disrupt the state’s Christmas-tree-lighting ceremony. All demonstrate that the state merely needed a slight nudge to devolve into a Hobbesian state of nature.
Then there’s liberal hero Ian Murphy, who impersonated billionaire David Koch while making a now-famous prank phone call to Gov. Scott Walker. Murphy, a blogger, was immediately lionized by union loyalists for supposedly “exposing” Walker’s ties to the Koch Brothers (whom Walker claims he has never met).
On Tuesday, the 540,000 signatures needed to force a recall election of Governor Walker are due; and in advance of this momentous occasion, Democrats have sent Murphy on a barnstorming tour to drum up support for the recall. Local newspapers have photographed Murphy chumming it up with incumbent state senators, many of whom fled the state last February in order to block a vote on the collective-bargaining bill. Flyers offer attendees the chance to “meet special guest Ian Murphy of the Daily Beast, famous for his ‘Fake David Koch’ phone call.”
But that isn’t the only thing that has brought fame to Ian Murphy. In May 2008, he wrote a vile column titled “F*** the Troops,” in which he ridiculed the notion that we should honor those fighting for our country. Among Murphy’s “greatest” hits (warning: profane language):
● “So, 4000 rubes are dead. Cry me the Tigris. Another 30,000 have been seriously wounded. Boo f***ing hoo. They got what they asked for — and cool robotic limbs, too.”
● “The benevolence of America’s ‘troops’ is sacrosanct. Questioning their rectitude simply isn’t done. It’s the forbidden zone. We may rail against this tragic war, but our soldiers are lauded by all as saints. Why? They volunteered to partake in this savage idiocy, and for this they deserve our utmost respect? I think not.”
● “The nearly two-thirds of us who know this war is bullshit need to stop s***ing off the troops. They get enough action raping female soldiers and sodomizing Iraqi detainees.”
● “As a society, we need to discard our blind deference to military service. There’s nothing admirable about volunteering to murder people. There’s nothing admirable about being rooked by obvious propaganda. There’s nothing admirable about doing what you’re told if what you’re told to do is terrible.”
● On John McCain: “Again, what is heroic about involving one’s self in a foolish war, being a sh***y pilot or getting tortured? Yeah, it must have sucked, but getting your ass kicked every day for five years doesn’t make you a hero—it makes you a Bad News Bear.”
● “But what kind of world would we rather live in: one where fools are admired for being fooled and murderers are extolled for murdering, or one where we have the capacity to step back and say, ‘I don’t care who told you to do what and why; you’re still an asshole!’ Personally, I’d rather live in a world where people who act like retards are treated like retards: executed in Texas.”
And on and on it goes.
Of course, anyone who is familiar with politics sees these reptiles trolling around on message boards and on Twitter. But Ian Murphy is now headlining legitimate events thrown by legitimate Democrats, none of whom will even acknowledge his puerile radicalism. (Very little, if any, of Murphy’s past has been reported in the state media, save for Milwaukee-area conservative talk radio.)
So let this be a lesson to other states. If you plan on altering government benefits at all, these are the types of people that will be granted legitimacy in your state. The fight for health and pension benefits supersedes any notion of decency. (Just ask the anti-Walker demonstrators who roughed up a police officer over the weekend because they demanded more cowbell.)
Miss Wisconsin won the Miss America pageant on Saturday night. She clearly represents the pretty side of the state. But Ian Murphy has given everyone a glimpse of how ugly it can be, too.
— Christian Schneider is a senior fellow at the Wisconsin Policy Research Institute and a co-author of the Campaign Manager Survey.
Make no mistake: scratch the "progressive activist" past the first couple layers of dermis, and it will be wastes of oxygen like Mr. Murphy here who bleeds!
Flame away, liberal trolls! Do tell us about "a few bad apples!" Screech in furious indignation, "How dare you question our patriotism!" Hell, I'm supremely confident you'll even find a way to call Mr. Schneider here a "racist" in the process.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAs a geology student, I turned over and/or hammered on many a rock in the Basin-and-Range country. Even surprised a rattlesnake once and did a standing broad jump about 4 feet directly to the rear.
Never uncovered anything as nasty as Ian Murphy, though.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseFor a group that, relentlessly, exalts the virtue of being "compassionate" towards others, liberals seem to have an awful lot of people who simply love being as vile as possible.
Yes, there are conservatives who do and say pretty ugly things. However, most of the time other conservatives routinely condemn that kind of stuff. Try and find any liberals who criticize (much less condemn) the ugly commentary by fellow liberals. Again, for people who profess such great "sensitivity" towards treating people with "civility" their silence (if not outright embrace) toward the Ian Murphy's among them is about as hypocritical as it gets.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseRight, there are a multitude of conservatives who have called out Tush Limbaugh et al. when they say nasty things.
Oh, I see, they don't call this stuff out because it's "fact" and as such any gratuitous nastiness can be forgiven.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseRush never made comments like those cited above by Ian Murphy.
Not even a good try at deflection.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseHere's a sampling of Mr. Limbaugh's sage observations:
(i) “The problem is, and dare I say this, it doesn’t look like Michelle Obama follows her own nutritionary, dietary advice. And then we hear that she’s out eating ribs at 1,500 calories a serving with 141 grams of fat per serving. Yeah, it does…what do you mean, ‘What do I mean?’ I’m trying to say that our First Lady does not project the image of women that you might see on the cover of the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue or of a woman Alex Rodriguez might date every six months or what have you.”
(ii) mocking Michael J. Fox, who has Parkinson's disease, by flailing uncontrollably
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAre you (pathetically) putting Limbaugh suggesting Michelle Obama ought to eat a salad once in a while in the same league as cheering the death of American soldiers??
I remember the MJF incident well, he was demonstrating his movements, not "mocking" it. It was on the RADIO, the only people who even saw the movements were subscribers who get the video feed.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"demonstrating" his movements? That's pathetic. You know full well that Mr. "Excellence in Broadcasting" intended to mock Mr. Fox. But let's not get sidetracked.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseKevin, kindly don't tell me what I "know full well." I heard this segment on the radio, and it's right here for all to view it, and draw their own conclusions. There is not a hint of humor, ridicule, or anything to suggest Limbaugh was "mocking" him in any way meant to be cruel or hurtful.
External Link
It's open to interpretation, of course, but seems to me that was something siezed upon days before an election rather than any genuine outrage by fair minded viewers. What is "pathetic" is your offering this as an equivalent to cheering the death of our troops.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI'm not a big Rush Limbaugh fan, but your examples are laughable.
Re the Michael J. Fox incident, Limbaugh was criticizing Fox's apparent decision to skip his anti-Parkinson's meds so that he would be a more sympathetic advocate for embryonic stem cell research. And LOTS of conservative people (Rush's listeners) criticized Limbaugh for that incident in real time -- so much so that Limbaugh later on the same show said that he owed Fox an apology if he was wrong.
Re Michelle Obama's hypocrisy in lecturing the rest of us on what to eat and how we should exercise more when she eats ribs and french fries for the cameras and can't fit into a pair of size 16 jeans . . . yeah, I guess Rush was way over the top on that.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseYou're pathetic.
In spite of your media mutters quotes that is an absolutely inane and ridiculous comparison. I'm not much of a Rush fan, but good grief that doesn't begin to compare with the vile crap Ian and most of the left spews.
It must be very difficult to be you and embarrass yourself this way.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIt must be very difficult to be you and embarrass yourself this way.
You can't shame the shameless. They're utterly oblivious to their own true natures.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAnd that is, in your mind, even in the same league as Ian's comments?
Seriously Kevin, I hope you are being paid to spam us here.
Because if you're not, it just shows how sad liberals have become.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"Right, there are a multitude of conservatives who have called out Tush Limbaugh et al. when they say nasty things."
-----------------
Except you can't point to any similar examples of conservatives saying anything this vile.
Note how you can't bring yourself to criticize Murphy.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseTranslation: "No fair! You did it first!"
Find something comparably fringe and "nasty" from Limbaugh as wishing death to U.S. troops.
Man, those crickets are loud today.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseRight on schedule, a day before the recall petitions are filed. Use what, if this were the republicans making the challenge, would be some "isolated" incidents to tar everyone you don't like and fire up the anti-union thugs (I'm using the word "thug" just because it's been so vastly overused on this site).
Re the Koch call, isn't it really shame on Mr. Walker for: (i) evidently thinking he had to take a call from one of the Koch brothers rather than refer him to a staffer, which I'd think would be SOP for unscheduled calls; and (ii) not being savvy enough to understand that someone like the real Mr. Koch (either one of them) wouldn't say the things the blogger said in the call to someone he'd never met?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseClimb down off the self-righteous pedestal before you fall and hurt yourself, dude.
What politician would take a cold call from a billionaire donor to his party and his movement? ALL of them. Dem and GOP, left, right, and center. Every. Last. One.
Let's cut the holier-than-thou cr*p, shall we?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAnd you know this how? What about his failure to realize the caller was a phony? It wasn't a one-minute call.
As for the holier than thou attitude, that accurately sums up Mr. Schneider's post.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseYou know, another poster here made a fine point. It would really be low hanging fruit for you to condemn Murphy's sentiments here as unrepresentative of your movement, as any normal and decent person would do.
You still haven't. Hmmm.... Don't bother, Kevin. You're not fooling anyone.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseFair enough--Mr. Murphy's comments are nasty. Still doesn't make this type of rhetoric the sole province of the left.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse