Obviously, the whole speech last night was confused and self-contradicting. Here is some evidence of that, in the president’s own words — I’ve taken five claims from the State of the Union and placed them alongside other statements from the same speech.
Level Playing Field and Equal Rules for All?
Claim:
Our workers are the most productive on Earth, and if the playing field is level, I promise you — America will always win.
Contradictions:
We have subsidized oil companies for a century. That’s long enough. It’s time to end the taxpayer giveaways to an industry that’s rarely been more profitable, and double-down on a clean energy industry that’s never been more promising. Pass clean energy tax credits and create these jobs. . . .
First, if you’re a business that wants to outsource jobs, you shouldn’t get a tax deduction for doing it. That money should be used to cover moving expenses for companies like Master Lock that decide to bring jobs home. . . .
From now on, every multinational company should have to pay a basic minimum tax. And every penny should go towards lowering taxes for companies that choose to stay here and hire here. . . .
Third, if you’re an American manufacturer, you should get a bigger tax cut. If you’re a high-tech manufacturer, we should double the tax deduction you get for making products here. And if you want to relocate in a community that was hit hard when a factory left town, you should get help financing a new plant, equipment, or training for new workers. . . .
Expand tax relief to small businesses that are raising wages and creating good jobs. . . .
My message is simple. It’s time to stop rewarding businesses that ship jobs overseas, and start rewarding companies that create jobs right here in America.
No Bailouts?
Claim:
It’s time to apply the same rules from top to bottom: No bailouts, no handouts, and no cop-outs.
Contradictions:
We bet on American workers. We bet on American ingenuity. And tonight, the American auto industry is back. . . .
That’s why I’m sending this Congress a plan that gives every responsible homeowner the chance to save about $3,000 a year on their mortgage, by refinancing at historically low interest rates. . . .
No More Red Tape?
Claim:
I will sign an Executive Order clearing away the red tape that slows down too many construction projects.
Contradiction:
I’m announcing the creation of a Trade Enforcement Unit that will be charged with investigating unfair trade practices in countries like China. There will be more inspections to prevent counterfeit or unsafe goods from crossing our borders. . . .
We will also establish a Financial Crimes Unit of highly trained investigators to crack down on large-scale fraud and protect people’s investments . . . [and] create a special unit of federal prosecutors and leading state attorneys general to expand our investigations into the abusive lending and packaging of risky mortgages that led to the housing crisis. . . .
That’s why we need smart regulations to prevent irresponsible behavior. Rules to prevent financial fraud, or toxic dumping, or faulty medical devices, don’t destroy the free market. They make the free market work better.
More Freedom in Education?
Claim:
That’s why my education reform offers more competition, and more control for schools and States.
Contradiction:
[We will force] every state to require that all students stay in high school until they graduate or turn eighteen . . . stop the interest rates on student loans from doubling . . . [and] extend the tuition tax credit. . . .
States need to do their part by making higher education a higher priority in their budgets.
Role of Government
Claim:
The Government should do for people only what they cannot do better by themselves, and no more.
Contradiction: All of the above.
Thank goodness I didn't waste my time listening to this hack.
Good luck with getting, I mean forcing, kids to stay in school till their 18 or have graduated. Aren't the drop out rates in inner cities something like 50%? Maybe the bamster and his lovely wife should take some time and spend some time in their "community" encouraging their fellow blacks to make something of themselves.
However, that would require cutting back on spending other people's money (ours) on parties and vacations and actually mixing with the riff raff instead of the "1 percenters".
I cannot understand how many people can't see these horribles for what they really are - craven hyprocrites.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"Claim:
"The Government should do for people only what they cannot do better by themselves, and no more.
"Contradiction: All of the above."
It's not a contradiction if you think your job is to reign over a nation of doofs who can't even tie their shoe laces without government training and regulations on the tension in the laces and the length of the bow.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI suppose it is always possible to produce "contradictions" by purposely misinterpreting what was said.
To take but one example. It is obviously possible to give local schools more freedom overall while also requiring some commitments. That is called prioritizing.
I don't feel like going through the whole list; it is a waste of time.
Nice job Veronique de Rugy. You have shown that you are totally incapable of writing anything even remotely persuasive.
Keep trying though. Maybe one day you will write something that isn't so obviously contrived. Maybe try being more subtle and not so blatant?
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse*Chortle.*
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"To take but one example. It is obviously possible to give local schools more freedom overall while also requiring some commitments. That is called prioritizing."
Yes. So long as you do everything I think is important you may, in your spare time, do some of the things you want to do, provided they don't contradict my priorities.
And as we all know, there's just NO WAY any U.S. Dept of Education bureaucrats will develop a long and growing list of "required commitments."
" You have shown that you are totally incapable of writing anything even remotely persuasive. Keep trying though." Physician, heal thyself.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseYou missed:
"That's why I'm sending this Congress a plan that gives every responsible homeowner the chance to save about $3,000 a year on their mortgage, by refinancing at historically low interest rates. No more red tape. No more runaround from the banks. A small fee on the largest financial institutions will ensure that it won't add to the deficit, and will give banks that were rescued by taxpayers a chance to repay a deficit of trust."
vs
"We've all paid the price for lenders who sold mortgages to people who couldn't afford them, and buyers who knew they couldn't afford them. That's why we need smart regulations to prevent irresponsible behavior. Rules to prevent financial fraud, or toxic dumping, or faulty medical devices, don't destroy the free market. They make the free market work better."
I guess the new "smart" regulations will enable us to detect irresponsible borrowers without imposing new hoops (aka red tape) for other borrowers. Not sure how he's square that circle, but for the guy who made the oceans stop rising, anything's possible.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSurprised that you didn't comment on the contradiction on student loan interest rates - they went way up when they nationalized them in Obamacare.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"That’s why I’m sending this Congress a plan that gives every responsible homeowner the chance to save about $3,000 a year on their mortgage, by refinancing at historically low interest rates"
Every responsible homeowner? I doubt it. How about every homeowner who happens to have a GSE-backed mortgage? And maybe a side plan to allow homeowners who don't have one to apply to have their loan switched over. Then the mass influx will allow for further expansion of the government's meddling...
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe only one of those that actually qualifies as a contradiction is the bailout claim, and in that one he's perfectly reflective of the greater American confusion on the point - we all hate bailouts, yet they're almost certainly better than the alternative. Who among us would really be happier if GM were no longer around?
The rest are just Ms. Veronica falling for (or trying to peddle) some obvious logical fallacies. There's no contradiction inherent in "we're going to give states more control over schools, but we're going to force states to do x and y with schools." None at all - they can be utterly consistent. How does a smart woman like the author decide that one can only give control or take away control, and not some combination of the two, and then base an argument upon such silliness in a public forum?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIt is possible to read the speech and think of Orwell, Rand and Clinton all at once, depending on what you think the meaning of "is" is. We all do overlook Obama's great uniter's strength - people on all sides think he's shifty, even if they think it's clever.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseHe kept talking about bringing back manufacturing jobs. That's a very small part of our economy. Last time I checked we were mainly a service economy. Do we want to take jobs from China where they work for $17/day and live in dorms?
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse