Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Corner

The one and only.

Print   |  Text
 

Howard Dean Screams about Komen

Howard Dean is attacking Komen, accusing them of cowardice for their decision to halt grants to Planned Parenthood:

The Komen Foundation has abandoned hundreds of thousands of women who rely on breast health services like mammograms — over a hundred and seventy thousand through its partnership with Planned Parenthood in recent years. By caving into pressure from the far right, the Komen Foundation has demonstrated that they lack courage.

Abby Johnson, author of Unplanned, formerly a Planned Parenthood director in Texas, offers support for Komen, pointing to how misleading that company line is:

I am thankful that Komen is finally acknowledging their harmful affiliation with Planned Parenthood. The money given has never gone for “mammograms and breast services” . . . since Planned Parenthood provides neither. I believed this has happened primarily because of the public outcry of pro-lifers. I hope they continue to halt giving to such a destructive organization.

Planned Parenthood refers women for screenings, they don’t do them. They do abortions. That’s their business. Kudos to Komen for walking away from that. There will be a lot of hell to pay from the abortion industry and its party, needless to say.

Dean is encouraging corporate sponsors to punish Komen:

Organizations which lack courage eventually fail. I support calls for the corporate donors to re-evaluate their support for Komen so that consumers aren’t forced to re-evaluate buying their products. I urge continued support for Planned Parenthood and the work they do to provide women’s health services and organizations who will continue the fight against breast cancer without endangering women’s lives for political purposes.

Planned Parenthood, of course, is the well-oiled political machine here, insulted that Komen listened to the army of Davids exposing the “war on women” talking point as the dangerous corporate spin it is. 

And Komen did not become an anti-abortion front group when they decided to halt grants to Planned Parenthood. As Komen explains in a statement today:

We are dismayed and extremely disappointed that actions we have taken to strengthen our granting process have been widely mischaracterized. It is necessary to set the record straight.

Starting in 2010, Komen began an initiative to help us do a better job of measuring the impact of community grants. This is important because we invest significant dollars in our local community programs — $93 million in 2011, which provided for 700,000 breast health screenings and diagnostic procedures.

Following this review, we made the decision to implement stronger performance criteria for our grantees to minimize duplication and free up dollars for direct services to help vulnerable women. To support this new granting strategy, Komen has also implemented more stringent eligibility standards to safeguard donor dollars. Consequently, some organizations are no longer eligible to receive Komen grants.

Some might argue that our standards are too exacting, but over the past three decades people have given us more than just their money. They have given us their trust and we take that responsibility very seriously.

We regret that these new policies have impacted some longstanding grantees, such as Planned Parenthood, but want to be absolutely clear that our grant-making decisions are not about politics. Throughout our 30 year history, our priority has always been and will continue to be the women we serve. As we move forward, we are working to ensure that there is no interruption or gaps in services for the women who need our support most in the fight against breast cancer.

Komen is in the business of preventing breast cancer. Komen made a responsible decision in keeping with their mission.  

New on The Corner. . .


COMMENTS   18

EXPAND  

   02/01/12 19:47

Please, Kathryn. Komen is also in the business of funding abortion. Funds are fungible. As soon as the investigation of Planned Parenthood is finished, Komen will restore the funding. Komen is pro-abortion and pro-life people should not support it.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/01/12 19:53

Well done Ms. Lopez...

"Komen made a responsible decision in keeping with their mission."

It is amazing to see how sound the offering becomes, when we see the NR focus on serious issues beyond the Primary.

Perhaps the very human devotion to a certain individual/candidate can blind all, even the very best us.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/01/12 20:17

> "The money given has never gone for “mammograms and breast services” . . . since Planned Parenthood provides neither..."

100% false. The Komen money went directly to PP affiliates for breast screenings. PP doesn't do screenings itself, as K-Lo pointed out, but it paid the screeners with the grant money, as she suspiciously failed to point out.

So congrats on your victory, culture warriors. Too bad the road to illegalized abortion is paved with cancer cells.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/01/12 20:37

Ah, Redtroll returns.

"So congrats on your victory, culture warriors."

Thanks. Next, we're going after that Congressional funding. Gonna teach you liberals the value of private charity yet :)

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/01/12 20:43

The only screening done by PP is manual checks, something done by many other service providers to low income people. That's what people on the right continue to fail to point and that the left continues to ignore. The only thing PP really provides that can't be had elsewhere is abortion.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/01/12 20:29

re:"They do abortions. That’s their business. "

This isn't true. The number of services they provide for contraception, STDs, cancer screening and other women's health issues are all much greater than the number of abortion services.

Abortions count for about 3% of their total services.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
hayaka
   02/01/12 20:35

"We regret that these new policies have impacted some longstanding grantees, such as Planned Parenthood, but want to be absolutely clear that our grant-making decisions are not about politics."

If it wasn't about politics, then what was it about? What did Planned Parenthood do to have suddenly become iineligible for a Komen grant?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/01/12 20:37

Why can't people write more direct press releases?
In this case, something like:

"Komen is about preventing breast cancer and raises money for purposes related to that. It would be as relevant for us to give that money to Planned Parenthood as to any other organization not involved directly in breast cancer screening and treatment -- literacy programs, elementary schools, gun control advocates or gun rights advocates, child nutrition programs or the SPCA.. Whether we agree with what they do is not the point. They don't directly provide the services for which we grant money, and it would be inefficient use of the money people have entrusted to us, to continue paying them to act as middlemen." (or whatever PC term has replaced "middlemen.")

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
btn
   02/01/12 20:40

There is no question this is a great PR victory for the pro-life forces who have spent a great deal of time consolidating their power within Komen. What kind of victory one gains from politicizing a breast cancer charity and creating a PR incident that is going to negatively impact their fundraising is another matter, and that is something the single minded abortion foes that run Komen care little about I am afraid.

Breast cancer is an issue for all women, not just pro-life women. Somewhere there is another breast cancer charity that is going to take advantage of this myopic decision and establish itself as the breast cancer charity for all women.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/01/12 20:50

Maybe Planned Parenthood should call for a glitter-bomb of all things related to Komen.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/01/12 21:27

It's just weird how obsessed the left is with killing babies. What's the deal? Some kind of secret Cult of Baal?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/01/12 21:42
   02/02/12 07:49

Definitely not secret. My Facebook news feed is on fire with indignation from the cabal.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/02/12 09:28

The one person who i was "friends" with that would have publically complained on facebook recently unfriended/blocked me when I told her that the new Obamacare rule regarding Catholic businesses was anti-freedom. I didn't even argue that the rule was a bad rule, just that she, and her other friends, were wrong about what is a "right" and which option had more freedom.

I'm actually glad she unfriended me, I really was sick of seeing her rants against christians and conservatives (which I usually left alone.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Machiavelli
   02/01/12 21:57

Regardless of whether Planned Parenthood receives funding from Komen the two organizations share a perverse symbiotic relationship. Delayed age of first pregnancy (or forgoing any pregnancies at all) especially through the widespread use of hormonal birth control and termination of early pregnancies - which is PP's existential purpose - has become the primary cause of breast cancer in women today. The breast tissue changes that lead to the later appearance of cancer tend to occur while the tissue is undifferentiated. Breast tissue does not differentiate until after the 21st week of the first pregnancy so even aborted pregnancies provide little protection. The best "cure" for breast cancer is to significantly reduce the risk of ever contracting it by carrying a baby to term while in the late teens or early twenties. Our society has empowered women to pursue first careers other than motherhood by giving them the choice to delay childbearing. Unfortunately, for many women who do delay childbearing they don't live to do the mothering as a result.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/01/12 22:35

But what about women's health, Mr. Dean? Oh, the only thing that concerns "women's health" is their ability to abort their baby. Everything else, including getting breast cancer, is subordinate to that.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/01/12 23:56

Is this not a private organization? If he has a problem with how they are spending their money, he doesn't have to donate to them. Why doesn't he just start his own breast cancer foundation?

He can call it the "Howard Brush Dean Breast Cancer Foundation", and then he can give all the donations he receives to Planned Parenthood if he thinks that is the best way to fight cancer...

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/02/12 00:41

Planned Parenthood assets: $1 Billion
Susan Koman Assets: $492 Million (with 299 million in liabilities)

Sources: ww5.komen.org/uploadedFiles/Content/AboutUs/Financial/2011%20Komen%20Financial%20Statements%20FINAL(3).pdf

thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/abortion/201833-planned-parenthood-tops-1-billion-in-assets

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact