Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Corner

The one and only.

Print   |  Text
 

Buddy Roemer Gets Federal Funding?

This just in: The Federal Election Commission has certified the first presidential candidate eligible to receive federal matching funds for the primary elections.

So which candidate in this hotly contested GOP slugfest will get that first infusion of federal cash? Is it Romney, the candidate with the most delegates so far, but who is now struggling in the press after a series of public missteps? Is it Newt Gingrich, who surprised Romney in South Carolina but flagged in Florida? Is it Santorum, the late-declared winner of Iowa who still doggedly pursues the nomination?

How about “D,” none of the above. The first candidate to receive taxpayer money in the 2012 campaign for the GOP presidential nomination is former Louisiana governor and congressman Charles E. “Buddy” Roemer III. If you didn’t know he was even running, you are not alone. He barely registers in the polls. But he will be getting federal funds. Indeed, primary candidates can receive up to a maximum of $22.8 million for this election.

What a waste of taxpayer dollars. In a free market of ideas, citizens who like the principles and views a candidate represents will contribute money to that candidate’s campaign. Citizens who don’t like a candidate’s agenda won’t support it financially.

But public funding of campaigns tends to bankroll candidates that voters don’t care about or don’t much like. Some days, it’s great to be a candidate — even an unpopular one.

New on The Corner. . .


COMMENTS   5

EXPAND  

Jabb
   02/03/12 17:06

Heh. And now we know where NR is on the "conservative" thing!

If you want an actual, you know, conservative as president, Roemer is probably the second-best candidate in the running. Most socially-conservative, if that matters to folks more than the actual "liberty" bit of conversative-ism.

(The best conservative candidate of course is Bill Black (L), but he doesn't get any press either. Wonder why that is.)

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
tylerjameshansen
   02/03/12 18:04

Waste of taxpayer dollars?
Pick your battles, please. Buddy Roemer is going to add a lot to this debate. The people lucky enough to hear his message love it. He just hasn't caught on because he only takes $100 bucks from his supporters and no PAC money. Plus, his ideas on campaign finance would hurt the profits of the media. But I believe the revenue lost would be minuscule when compared to the ensuing lift of our collective human spirit. Our elections are a vicious charade and we all lose because we treat it like a sport. You guys dumb it down and pit sides against each other, making everyone angry and ignorant.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
tylerjameshansen
   02/03/12 18:10

Waste of taxpayer dollars?
Pick your battles, please. Buddy Roemer is going to add a lot to this debate. The people lucky enough to hear his message love it. He just hasn't caught on because he only takes $100 bucks from his supporters and no PAC money. Plus, his ideas on campaign finance would hurt the profits of the media. But I believe the revenue lost would be minuscule when compared to the ensuing lift of our collective human spirit. Our elections are a vicious charade and we all lose because we treat it like a sport. You guys dumb it down and pit sides against each other, making everyone angry and ignorant.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/23/12 15:54

FEC matching funds are based entirely on voluntary contributions. People check off a box on their tax form saying they want to donate money to be used that way.

Calling it a "waste of taxpayer dollars" is beyond ignorant. If people think its a waste they don't have to check that box.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Say Amen
   04/16/12 17:43

In order to receive those matching funds, Buddy Roemer had to receive a minimum number of donations from several different states, totaling a minimum amount. All of those donations were received while he was running as a Republican for the Republican nomination.

If the people who gave the donations, and I was one, would have known that he was going to switch to a third party-- the secret big money financed Americans Elect -- and be running against the Republican nominee, would they have made their donation? I would not have given the donation if I had known that he would do that.

It is wrong for Roemer to receive donations and then $285K in matching funds to use in his campaign against the Republican party when he received those donations and those matching funds on the false representation that he was operating a Republican party campaign. Anyone who receives donations while campaigning in one party should not be able to use those donations as the basis for matching funds and then use the original donations and the matching funds to run a campaign in another party.

If you would like to learn more about Buddy Roemer, go to this website and read the comments by Buddy's supporters and a critic. Also examine the web pages they cite, which will provide you with independent analysis.

External Link 

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact