Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Corner

The one and only.

Print   |  Text
 

The Contraception Mandate and Religious Freedom

Our nation has a long legacy of defending individuals’ religious freedoms. James Madison, the father of our nation’s Constitution and the author of the Bill of Rights, once wrote that “conscience is the most sacred of all property.” Since our nation’s earliest days, the U.S. Supreme Court has consistently affirmed our First Amendment right to exercise our religious beliefs freely. But today, recent decisions by the Obama administration are threatening Americans’ religious liberty.

This past summer, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) exercised its authority under the new health-care law to announce a rule that most employer-provided health insurance plans cover contraception, sterilization, and abortion-inducing drugs. This new mandate contains a “religious employer” exception, but the exception is so narrow that many religiously affiliated hospitals, educational institutions, and charities do not meet the requirements. After releasing this rule for comment, HHS heard from hundreds of thousands of Americans who were opposed to the regulation and the narrow scope of its exception. However, despite the concerns of so many, HHS announced last month that it would not change the mandate for non-profit religious employers, but only extend to next year the deadline for them to comply.

Extending the deadline does not change what is at stake. Faith-based groups that object to this requirement on moral grounds are now being forced to choose between offering services that violate their religious beliefs or eliminating their employees’ health coverage. Targeting religious beliefs in this manner erodes the principle of religious liberty upon which our country was founded.

Last October, I joined many of my Senate colleagues in requesting that HHS secretary Kathleen Sebelius reconsider this regulation and instead follow our nation’s tradition of respecting religious liberty. Additionally, in September I sponsored S. 1467, the Respect for Rights of Conscience Act, legislation that would protect health-care providers and employers from being forced to pay for products and services under the new health care law that violate their ethical values. 

Our federal government should not force religious groups to betray their fundamental beliefs. Current conscience protections permit some religious groups to abstain from participating in war or working on religious holy days, and others to be exempt from the health-care law’s individual mandate to purchase a certain level of health insurance as defined by the federal government. In the recently decided case Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church v. EEOC, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the government cannot interfere with “the internal governance of the church” in ministerial hiring decisions.

The threat to religious liberty caused by this unprecedented overreach by the federal government should be of concern for all Americans — whether or not they ascribe to a particular faith. What is most concerning is this: If the government can compel an individual or group to violate one’s “sacred” conscience, then there is no limit to government power. All of our cherished constitutional rights would be subject to the whims of the federal government and those in power. One group’s beliefs are being trampled today; another’s might be tomorrow. Our constitutional rights and freedoms are essential to who we are as Americans, and our commitment to these precious rights must be protected at every turn.

— Jerry Moran represents Kansas in the U.S. Senate.

New on The Corner. . .


COMMENTS   10

EXPAND  

John Q.
   02/07/12 17:43

I didn't know the conservatives believed that employees have a right to employer-provided health care coverage. Where do I find that in the Constitution?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/07/12 18:53

While I feel bad for the "rights" of the unborn and the religious freedoms of the people of the US, I do not feel bad for the clergy and those of the clergy that supported the healthcare law in the first place with the false promise of the President and his minions that they would not be subjected to the rules of it. There is a blatant hypocritical argument behind the fact that if it applies to "those guys and not us" it is a good law. If it was a good law last year and not a good law this year, I feel no pain on your behalf.

So cry me a river all of you Catholic Bishops and thanks for opposing the bill in the first place. Had you stood up then and said that you opposed the bill before it became law, we wouldn't be having the discussion. I guess that your false conscience support after the fact does little to help us up front, I take some small comfort that we are now all in the same boat and your participation now may help to get some additional support for repeal.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/07/12 19:58

Additionally, in September I sponsored S. 1467, the Respect for Rights of Conscience Act, legislation that would protect health-care providers and employers from being forced to pay for products and services under the new health care law that violate their ethical values.

You know what would be better than adding Yet Another Sheaf of Paper to the mountain? In order of preference:

1. Eliminate the HHS. The Constitution does not authorize such a thing.

2. Revoke Obamacare root and branch. The Constitution does not enumerate healthcare powers for the federal government.

3. Revoke the entire mandate by HHS. The fed has no business telling private insurance companies what they can and cannot offer to their private customers.

4. Nuke the beltway from orbit, just to be sure. This one is last on the list because the Aeronautic and Space Museum would be destroyed, and that would be a shame.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/07/12 20:06

ADDENDUM

Why should only the religious be allowed to "conscientiously object" to the mandate? What about all the millions of folks who hew to The American Religion and therefore object to the HHS mandate (and Obamacare) on Constitutional and other patriotic grounds?

If people get to opt out of the draft for reasons of conscience, why not this?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Palin Fan
   02/08/12 12:54

Your proposition lacks one essential fact: the Air and Space Museum would only be partially destroyed, over half of it resides outside of the blast zone in Virginia near the Dulles airport.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/07/12 22:29

Its time for the bishops to play the role of Antigone. Its time to defy Creon and throw dirt on Polyneices.

And next time maybe, just maybe the bishops will think twice before helping to *elect* Creon.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Harpoon
   02/07/12 23:08

Pharaoh has spoken "so let it be written, so let it be done." The Potomac is the new Nile. Get used to it folks; it's only gonna get worse.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/08/12 08:51

With all due respect to Mr. Moran, this is just one more round of the same ol' kabuki dance.

Congress passes a law, but essentially the law tells the executive branch to fill in the details with all sorts of pettifogging regulations. They do this because no matter what those details are, some constituency of some congressman will be ticked off.

The executive branch fills in the details which, naturally, irritates somebody's constituents. That representative and/or senator then gets to make all sort of grand-standing poses, write firm op-eds, and "fight" for his voters with a nobility and courage they somehow couldn't muster when it came to drafting the law in the first place.

Constituents are then grateful to their congressman and vote for him the next time, too.

For all I know, Mr. Moran opposed Obamacare in the first place, but it doesn't really matter. Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, TSA, immigration, Dodd-Frank, school funding, college loans, TARP, and all the rest - this is how they get handled again and again and again. Congress ducks its own responsibilities and foists the legislative details on the executive, then complains about whatever it is the executive does in order to win favors back home.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Palin Fan
   02/08/12 13:00

One of the problems is the extent to which the Church has been infiltrated by liberals. The Church should have oppose the Democrat Party based on that party's unqualified support for abortion. Its opposition should have been consistent and steadfast since 1972. Instead it has essentially supported the Democrats and turned a blind eye to Roe v. Wade.

I am a life long Catholic. It is long over due, but I am happy to see the Church finally join the good fight against the evil that has for too long been allowed to flourish in Washington.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
judith leonard
   02/21/12 16:40

Thank you Senator Moran. Please help us eliminate this unconstitutional tramping on religious freedom and right of conscience.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact