The official description of the terrific new movie, Rampart, starring Woody Harrelson and co-written by the great James Ellroy:
Los Angeles, 1999. Officer Dave Brown (two-time Academy Award nominee Woody Harrelson) is a Vietnam vet and a Rampart Precinct cop, dedicated to doing “the people’s dirty work” and asserting his own code of justice, often blurring the lines between right and wrong to maintain his action-hero state of mind. When he gets caught on tape beating a suspect, he finds himself in a personal and emotional downward spiral as the consequences of his past sins and his refusal to change his ways in light of a department-wide corruption scandal seal his fate. Brown internalizes his fear, anguish and paranoia as his world, complete with two ex-wives who are sisters, two daughters, an aging mentor dispensing bad advice, investigators galore, and a series of seemingly random women, starts making less and less sense. In the end, what is left is a human being stripped of all his pretense, machismo, chauvinism, arrogance, sexism, homophobia, racism, aggression, misanthropy; but is it enough to redeem him as a man? Running Time: 107 min
Wow. Just wow. Did they leave anything out?
Of course, what the film is really about is a cop who will use — in leftist parlance — “any means necessary” in order to take down various bad guys and dirt bags. In other words, it’s a classic Demon Dog story of flawed men searching for redemption and seeking it in all the wrong places: with strange women, in pharmaceutical bottles, in the liquor store, and at the point of a gun. You know how it’s all going to turn out, but still you watch, fascinated.
Oh yes, and a star turn for Harrelson. Plus it’s set in David Kahane’s own beloved L.A. neighborhood of Echo Park. Not for children, the squeamish, the politically correct, social conservatives, or anyone offended by the existence of a Hobbesian world just around the corner from Dodger Stadium or, worse, in the nice house next door to you.
"Did they leave anything out?"
They missed stripping him of belief in "patriotism", "loyalty" and "faith". Unless those all fall under "pretense"?
No, I don't expect I'll be seeing this movie.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAlice,
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe difference is that "machismo, chauvinism, arrogance, sexism, homophobia, racism, aggression, misanthropy" etc. are negative qualities, while patriotism, loyalty and faith are positive qualities (at least in my mind). Shouldn't we all celebrate when someone is stripped of those negative qualities?
I guess I was bit by my own Hollywood-speak-filter, because it seems to me that patriotic, loyal, religious characters are frequently portrayed as possessing so many of those "negative" qualities, e.g. hypocritical scoundrels where the seemlingly positive characteristic is merely another symptom of an ignorant bad guy.
I do agree they ARE different, and thank you for explicitly saying so.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWoody Harrelson is reason enough to stay away.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"Not for children, the squeamish, the politically correct social conservatives, or anyone offended by the existence of a another America just around the corner from Dodger Stadium or, worse, in the nice house next door to you."
One small change and this is ready for the Puffington Host.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseDid you say "see this terrific movie" and then spend the rest of the post telling why I shouldn't?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseTalk about a muddled endorsement. But I must say, the cliche movie is not something that gets my juices flowing. I'll just pop "Dark Blue" into the DVD player and watch Kirk Russell do the same role, in the same movie, in LA. Save the cash.
Or for even more fun, watch "The Shield", where the "hero" bad cop forgoes the whole redemption thing...much more satisfying.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseBest show ever put on television.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseLos Angeles, 1999. Officer Dave Brown (two-time Academy Award nominee mush-for-brains pothead Woody Harrelson)
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"In the end, what is left is a human being stripped of all his pretense, machismo, chauvinism, arrogance, sexism, homophobia, racism, aggression, misanthropy; but is it enough to redeem him as a man?"
I suspect that the answer is "no, not if he still has two cojones and an independent thought in his head."
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"Politically correct social conservatives"
Did I wake up in Bizaro world this morning? Or did I just read a Corner contributor push a liberal themed movie and then condemn conservatives for being PC?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI think what he means is, this movie isn't for people who believe that the "means" used to achieve an "end" matter. It's the objective that matter, not the tools used to achieve it. I disagree completely with Walsh, if that's what he's saying.
But the movie sounds intriguing. I'm all for a story that involves someone repenting from their immoral ways.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseFrom the description, the repenting came when there was nothing left. Hardly a moral giant.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseBetter late than never.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAre you kidding me? NR is recommending a Woody Harrelson movie? I wouldn't go see a Woody Harrelson movie if you paid me. What's going on with NR?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseNR is not recommending it. Michael Walsh is. This is not an editorial.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse????
Here's an original idea: What if we make a movie about a brutal, womanizing, homophobic, racist, hard drinking and drugging crooked cop straight out of Viet Nam? You know, The Bad Lieutenant - but from Viet Nam!
Pass the re-imagined stereoptypes, please.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseLike the commenters below, I only enjoy movies where the characters think and behave in the same way I would. I'm also incapable of enjoying a performance by any actor whose personal beliefs disagree with my own.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseNot for social conservatives? Remember when National Review was a publication for ALL conservatives? Cause it was so long ago I don't think I can remember that far.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseMr. Walsh, you do realize that the real-life "Rampart" cops were minorities, don't you? The Rampart scandal was, first and foremost, an affirmative-action scandal. In order to recruit more minorities, the LAPD relaxed the standards it held for recruits with criminal records. Thus, more LAPD with criminal records. So, eventually, LAPD got cops who worked for Suge Knight, cops who were implicated in the murder of Tupac Shakur.
Having Woody Harrelson play a "Rampart" cop is, literally and metaphorically, a whitewashing.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse